IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022 Mar;69(3):1133-1140. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3114717. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
This study determined the contribution of the deep hip muscles to hip stability.
Hip stability was defined as rotational hip stiffness in the sagittal plane, which was calculated for walking trials for 12 participants via an electromyography (EMG)-informed neuromusculoskeletal model which included all 22 hip spanning muscles. Three model configurations which differed in deep hip muscle excitations but had identical excitations for all other muscles were compared: (1) deep hip muscles informed by intramuscular EMG measurements (assisted activation); (2) deep hip muscles with simulated zero activation (no activation); (3) deep hip muscles with simulated maximal activation (maximal activation). Sagittal plane rotational hip stiffness across the gait cycle was compared between the three model configurations using a within-participant analysis of variance via statistical parametric mapping (p < 0.05).
Compared to the assisted activation configuration, hip stiffness (mean (95% confidence interval)) was 0.8% (0.7 to 0.9) lower in the no activation configuration, and 3.2% (3.0 to 3.4) higher in the maximal activation configuration.
Regardless of activation level, deep hip muscles contributed little to sagittal plane rotational hip stiffness, which casts doubt on their assumed function as hip stabilizers.
The merit of targeted deep hip muscle strengthening to improve hip stability in rehabilitation programs remains unclear.
本研究旨在确定深部髋关节肌肉对髋关节稳定性的贡献。
髋关节稳定性被定义为矢状面髋关节旋转刚度,通过肌电图(EMG)知情的神经肌肉骨骼模型计算 12 名参与者的行走试验,该模型包括所有 22 个髋关节肌肉。比较了三种模型配置,它们在深部髋关节肌肉兴奋方面存在差异,但所有其他肌肉的兴奋相同:(1)通过肌内 EMG 测量信息指导的深部髋关节肌肉(辅助激活);(2)深部髋关节肌肉模拟零激活(无激活);(3)深部髋关节肌肉模拟最大激活(最大激活)。使用基于参与者的方差分析和统计参数映射(p < 0.05)比较三种模型配置在步态周期中的矢状面髋关节旋转刚度。
与辅助激活配置相比,无激活配置下髋关节刚度(平均值(95%置信区间))低 0.8%(0.7 至 0.9),最大激活配置下髋关节刚度高 3.2%(3.0 至 3.4)。
无论激活水平如何,深部髋关节肌肉对矢状面髋关节旋转刚度的贡献都很小,这对其作为髋关节稳定器的假设功能提出了质疑。
针对深部髋关节肌肉进行强化以改善康复计划中髋关节稳定性的有效性仍不清楚。