Meinders Evy, Pizzolato Claudio, Gonçalves Basílio, Lloyd David G, Saxby David J, Diamond Laura E
Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia; Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute (ADaPT), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.
Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia; Advanced Design and Prototyping Technologies Institute (ADaPT), Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.
J Biomech. 2022 Apr;135:111019. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111019. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
A better understanding of deep hip muscle function is needed to establish whether retraining and strengthening these muscles is a worthwhile target for rehabilitation. This study aimed to determine the contribution of the deep hip muscles to the direction of hip loading in the acetabulum. Hip contact forces were calculated during walking and squatting for 12 participants (age: 24 ± 4 yrs, 4 females) using electromyography-informed neuromusculoskeletal modelling. Models were configured with different deep hip muscle activation levels: deep hip muscles (piriformis, obturator internus and externus, gemellus superior and inferior, and quadratus femoris) informed by intramuscular electromyography measurements (i.e., normal activation; assisted activation) and simulated with zero (no activation) or maximal (maximal activation) activation. The angle between the hip contact force and the vector from the femoral head to the acetabular center (hip contact force angle) was calculated for all configurations, where lower angles equated to hip loading directed towards the acetabular center. The position and spread of acetabular loading during both tasks were calculated for all configurations and compared using a within-participant analysis of variance via statistical parametric mapping (P < 0.05). Maximal activation resulted in lower hip contact force angles and more anterior-inferior oriented, albeit a slightly reduced, spread of acetabular loading compared to assisted activation and no activation. Results suggest that, if activated maximally, the deep hip muscles can change the direction of hip loading away from commonly damaged areas of acetabular cartilage. Targeted training of these muscles may be relevant for individuals with hip pathology who present with unfavorable regional loading and/or cartilage lesions.
为了确定对这些肌肉进行再训练和强化是否是康复的一个有价值的目标,需要更好地了解髋部深层肌肉的功能。本研究旨在确定髋部深层肌肉对髋臼中髋部负荷方向的贡献。使用肌电图辅助的神经肌肉骨骼模型,计算了12名参与者(年龄:24±4岁,4名女性)在行走和下蹲过程中的髋关节接触力。模型配置了不同的髋部深层肌肉激活水平:根据肌内肌电图测量结果(即正常激活;辅助激活)对髋部深层肌肉(梨状肌、闭孔内肌和闭孔外肌、上下孖肌以及股方肌)进行模拟,并分别设置为零激活(无激活)或最大激活(最大激活)。计算了所有配置下髋关节接触力与从股骨头到髋臼中心的向量之间的夹角(髋关节接触力角度),角度越小表明髋部负荷越朝向髋臼中心。计算了所有配置下两项任务期间髋臼负荷的位置和分布,并通过统计参数映射,采用受试者内方差分析进行比较(P<0.05)。与辅助激活和无激活相比,最大激活导致较低的髋关节接触力角度以及更偏向于前下方向的髋臼负荷分布,尽管分布范围略有减小。结果表明,如果最大程度地激活,髋部深层肌肉可以改变髋部负荷的方向,使其远离髋臼软骨的常见损伤区域。对于存在不利区域负荷和/或软骨损伤的髋部病变患者,针对性地训练这些肌肉可能具有重要意义。