• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)检测方法在三阴性乳腺癌中的免疫组化比较。

Immunohistochemical comparison of three programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays in triple-negative breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 24;16(9):e0257860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257860. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0257860
PMID:34559865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8462691/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive type of breast cancer. A recent study demonstrated the efficacy of anti-PD-L1 (anti-programmed death ligand-1) immunotherapy in patients with TNBC. However, the identification of TNBC patients who may benefit from immunotherapy is a critical issue. Several assays have been used to evaluate PD-L1 expression, and a few studies comparing PD-L1 expression using various primary antibodies in TNBC tissues have been reported. However, the expression profiles of the PD-L1 using the 73-10 assay have not yet been analyzed in TNBC tissues.

METHODS

We analyzed the PD-L1 immunohistochemical profiles of 62 women with TNBC using the 73-10, SP142 (companion diagnostic for atezolizumab), and E1L3N assays. PD-L1 expression on immune cells (ICs) and tumor cells (TCs) was also evaluated, and PD-L1 positivity was defined as a PD-L1-expressing ICs or TCs ≥ 1%.

RESULTS

The expression rates of PD-L1 were 79.0%, 67.7%, and 46.8% on ICs, and 17.7%, 6.5%, and 12.9% on TCs using the 73-10, SP142, and E1L3N assays, respectively. The concordance rates between the 73-10 and SP142 assays were 85.5% (on ICs) and 88.7% (on TCs), respectively, and substantial agreement on ICs (coefficient 0.634) and moderate agreement (coefficient 0.485) on TCs were noted. Sample age and tumor diameter did not influence the ratio of PD-L1 expression among the assays.

CONCLUSIONS

The positive rate on ICs and TCs of the 73-10 assay was higher than that of the SP 142 and E1L3N assays. Although substantial agreement on ICs and moderate agreement on TCs between the 73-10 and SP142 assays was noted in the present cohort, further studies are needed to clarify the PD-L1 expression status using various primary antibodies in a larger patient population. This would lead to the establishment of an effective evaluation method to assess the predictive value of anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy.

摘要

背景

三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)是最具侵袭性的乳腺癌类型。最近的一项研究表明,抗 PD-L1(程序性死亡配体 1)免疫疗法对 TNBC 患者有效。然而,确定可能从免疫疗法中获益的 TNBC 患者是一个关键问题。已经使用了几种检测方法来评估 PD-L1 的表达,并且已经报道了一些使用 TNBC 组织中的各种主要抗体比较 PD-L1 表达的研究。然而,73-10 检测中 PD-L1 的表达谱尚未在 TNBC 组织中进行分析。

方法

我们使用 73-10、SP142(atezolizumab 的伴随诊断试剂)和 E1L3N 检测分析了 62 名 TNBC 女性的 PD-L1 免疫组化特征。还评估了 PD-L1 在免疫细胞(ICs)和肿瘤细胞(TCs)上的表达,将 PD-L1 阳性定义为表达 PD-L1 的 ICs 或 TCs≥1%。

结果

使用 73-10、SP142 和 E1L3N 检测,ICs 上 PD-L1 的表达率分别为 79.0%、67.7%和 46.8%,TCs 上 PD-L1 的表达率分别为 17.7%、6.5%和 12.9%。73-10 检测与 SP142 检测的一致性率分别为 85.5%(ICs)和 88.7%(TCs),ICs 上的强一致性(系数 0.634)和 TCs 上的中度一致性(系数 0.485)。样本年龄和肿瘤直径不影响检测之间 PD-L1 表达的比值。

结论

73-10 检测的 ICs 和 TCs 的阳性率高于 SP142 和 E1L3N 检测。虽然在本队列中,73-10 检测与 SP142 检测在 ICs 上具有强一致性,在 TCs 上具有中度一致性,但需要进一步研究在更大的患者人群中使用各种主要抗体来阐明 PD-L1 的表达状态。这将导致建立一种有效的评估方法来评估抗 PD-L1 免疫疗法的预测价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1716/8462691/4fe6f91edc2c/pone.0257860.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1716/8462691/c0bbfcb2482d/pone.0257860.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1716/8462691/14226916a706/pone.0257860.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1716/8462691/93274ac06a34/pone.0257860.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1716/8462691/31a09c1294ab/pone.0257860.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1716/8462691/06bbfbc83c83/pone.0257860.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1716/8462691/4fe6f91edc2c/pone.0257860.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1716/8462691/c0bbfcb2482d/pone.0257860.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1716/8462691/14226916a706/pone.0257860.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1716/8462691/93274ac06a34/pone.0257860.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1716/8462691/31a09c1294ab/pone.0257860.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1716/8462691/06bbfbc83c83/pone.0257860.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1716/8462691/4fe6f91edc2c/pone.0257860.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Immunohistochemical comparison of three programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays in triple-negative breast cancer.三种程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)检测方法在三阴性乳腺癌中的免疫组化比较。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 24;16(9):e0257860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257860. eCollection 2021.
2
Programmed Death Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evaluation of Inter-Pathologist Concordance and Inter-Assay Variability.三阴性乳腺癌中程序性死亡配体1免疫组织化学:病理学家间一致性和检测间变异性的评估
J Breast Cancer. 2021 Jun;24(3):266-279. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e29. Epub 2021 May 26.
3
PD-L1 testing based on the SP142 antibody in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: summary of an expert round-table discussion.基于 SP142 抗体的 PD-L1 检测在转移性三阴性乳腺癌中的应用:专家圆桌讨论综述。
Future Oncol. 2021 Apr;17(10):1209-1218. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1100. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
4
Expression of PD-L1 in triple-negative breast cancer based on different immunohistochemical antibodies.基于不同免疫组化抗体的三阴性乳腺癌中PD-L1的表达
J Transl Med. 2016 Jun 10;14(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0925-6.
5
Comparison of three FDA-approved diagnostic immunohistochemistry assays of PD-L1 in triple-negative breast carcinoma.三种美国食品药品监督管理局批准的 PD-L1 诊断免疫组织化学检测方法在三阴性乳腺癌中的比较。
Hum Pathol. 2021 Feb;108:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
6
A multicentre analytical comparison study of inter-reader and inter-assay agreement of four programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry assays for scoring in triple-negative breast cancer.四组程序性死亡配体 1 免疫组化检测试剂盒在三阴性乳腺癌评分中的读者间和检测间一致性的多中心分析比较研究。
Histopathology. 2021 Mar;78(4):567-577. doi: 10.1111/his.14254. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
7
Comparative analysis of programmed cell death ligand 1 assays in renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌中程序性细胞死亡配体1检测方法的比较分析
Histopathology. 2020 Jul;77(1):67-78. doi: 10.1111/his.14054. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
8
Discordance in PD-L1 expression using 22C3 and SP142 assays between primary and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.22C3 和 SP142 检测原发性和转移性三阴性乳腺癌中 PD-L1 表达的不一致性。
Virchows Arch. 2023 Dec;483(6):855-863. doi: 10.1007/s00428-023-03634-2. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
9
Comparison of SP142 and 22C3 PD-L1 assays in a population-based cohort of triple-negative breast cancer patients in the context of their clinically established scoring algorithms.在基于人群的三阴性乳腺癌患者队列中,比较 SP142 和 22C3 PD-L1 检测试剂盒在其临床建立的评分算法中的应用。
Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Oct 10;25(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01724-2.
10
The predictive and prognostic value of Foxp3+/CD25+ regulatory T cells and PD-L1 expression in triple negative breast cancer.Foxp3+/CD25+ 调节性 T 细胞和 PD-L1 表达在三阴性乳腺癌中的预测和预后价值。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2019 Jun;40:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The association of PD-L1 expression and CD8-positive T cell infiltration rate with the pathological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer.PD-L1 表达和 CD8+T 细胞浸润率与曲妥珠单抗联合新辅助化疗后 HER2 阳性乳腺癌病理完全缓解的相关性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 May;205(1):17-27. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07242-1. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
2
Intratumor spatial heterogeneity in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression in early-stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌中程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)蛋白表达的肿瘤内空间异质性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Sep;201(2):289-298. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06977-1. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Immunohistochemical analysis of CD155 expression in triple-negative breast cancer patients.免疫组织化学分析三阴性乳腺癌患者 CD155 的表达。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 11;16(6):e0253176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253176. eCollection 2021.
2
Prognostic significance of PD-L1-positive cancer-associated fibroblasts in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.PD-L1 阳性的癌相关成纤维细胞对三阴性乳腺癌患者的预后意义。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07970-x.
3
Comparison of three FDA-approved diagnostic immunohistochemistry assays of PD-L1 in triple-negative breast carcinoma.
Prognostic significance of the expression levels of T-cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 and its ligand galectin-9 for relapse-free survival in triple-negative breast cancer.
T细胞免疫球蛋白粘蛋白-3及其配体半乳糖凝集素-9表达水平对三阴性乳腺癌无复发生存的预后意义
Oncol Lett. 2022 Jun;23(6):197. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13318. Epub 2022 May 4.
三种美国食品药品监督管理局批准的 PD-L1 诊断免疫组织化学检测方法在三阴性乳腺癌中的比较。
Hum Pathol. 2021 Feb;108:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
4
Adipophilin expression is an independent marker for poor prognosis of patients with triple-negative breast cancer: An immunohistochemical study.脂联素表达是三阴性乳腺癌患者预后不良的独立标志物:一项免疫组织化学研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 17;15(11):e0242563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242563. eCollection 2020.
5
Phase III Trial of Avelumab Maintenance After First-Line Induction Chemotherapy Versus Continuation of Chemotherapy in Patients With Gastric Cancers: Results From JAVELIN Gastric 100.avelumab 维持治疗用于一线诱导化疗后与继续化疗相比用于胃癌患者的 III 期临床试验:JAVELIN Gastric 100 的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 20;39(9):966-977. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00892. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
6
A multicentre analytical comparison study of inter-reader and inter-assay agreement of four programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry assays for scoring in triple-negative breast cancer.四组程序性死亡配体 1 免疫组化检测试剂盒在三阴性乳腺癌评分中的读者间和检测间一致性的多中心分析比较研究。
Histopathology. 2021 Mar;78(4):567-577. doi: 10.1111/his.14254. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
7
Concordance of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression between SP142 and 22C3/SP263 Assays in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.三阴性乳腺癌中SP142与22C3/SP263检测法检测程序性死亡配体1表达的一致性
J Breast Cancer. 2020 Jun;23(3):303-313. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2020.23.e37.
8
Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry Assay Comparison Studies in NSCLC: Characterization of the 73-10 Assay.程序性死亡配体 1 免疫组织化学检测 NSCLC 比较研究:73-10 检测方法的特征。
J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Aug;15(8):1306-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.04.013. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
9
PD-L1 status in breast cancer: Current view and perspectives.乳腺癌中PD-L1的状态:当前观点与展望
Semin Cancer Biol. 2021 Jul;72:146-154. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.12.003. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
10
Prognostic Value of Ki-67 in Patients With Resected Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Ki-67在三阴性乳腺癌切除患者中的预后价值:一项荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2019 Oct 17;9:1068. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01068. eCollection 2019.