• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

添加游离水对接受商业配方管饲喂养儿童的影响。

Effect of Added Free Water to Enteral Tube Feeds in Children Receiving Commercial Blends.

机构信息

Aerodigestive Center, Center for Motility and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022 Mar 1;74(3):419-423. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003308.

DOI:10.1097/MPG.0000000000003308
PMID:34560723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9531939/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of free water administration on clinical outcomes in medically complex patients, based on the hypothesis that patients receiving more thin liquids have worse outcomes related to increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of children initiated on commercial blenderized tube feedings from 2010 to 2019. The percentage of gastrostomy intake that was a thin liquid was determined, with thin liquids including free water or thin formula based on the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) framework. Patients were categorized into those receiving low volumes of thin liquids ("percent thin" ≤20%) and those receiving higher volumes ("percent thin" >20%). Emergency room visits, hospital admissions, and chest X-rays during the year after starting the blend were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients age 12 months to 18.7 years (median 3.7 years) were included. Twenty patients (44%) were receiving a blend with an IDDSI-categorized thin consistency and 25 patients (56%) were receiving a thicker blend. In addition to the blend, patients received a median of 320 mL per day of water (range 0-1000 mL). Patients receiving <20% thin liquids were less likely to undergo chest X-rays during follow-up than patients receiving larger amounts of thin liquids (10% in the minimal thin group versus 48% in the greater thin group, P = 0.03). In a multivariable logistic regression, this relationship remained significant after controlling for underlying pulmonary disease, aspiration, method of feed administration (bolus or continuous feeds), fundoplication status, and oral intake status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that patients on blenderized tube feeds receive widely variable amounts of added thin liquids, like water. The addition of water to tube feeds, while typically given for hydration, can modify feed viscosity and clinical outcomes, such as chest X-ray performance.

摘要

目的

根据患者接受更多稀薄液体与胃食管反流风险增加相关的不良结局这一假设,确定给予自由水对复杂医学患者临床结局的影响。

方法

本研究为回顾性图表审查,纳入 2010 年至 2019 年期间开始接受商业搅拌机管饲的儿童。根据国际吞咽障碍饮食标准化倡议(IDDSI)框架,确定胃造口术摄入物中稀薄液体的百分比,稀薄液体包括自由水或稀薄配方。根据接受稀薄液体量的多少将患者分为接受低量稀薄液体(“稀薄液体百分比”≤20%)和高量稀薄液体(“稀薄液体百分比”>20%)的患者。比较开始混合喂养后一年内急诊就诊、住院和胸部 X 射线的情况。

结果

纳入 45 名年龄 12 个月至 18.7 岁(中位数 3.7 岁)的患者。20 名(44%)患者接受 IDDSI 分类为稀薄一致性的混合物,25 名(56%)患者接受较稠的混合物。除了混合物外,患者平均每天还接受 320 毫升水(范围 0-1000 毫升)。与接受大量稀薄液体的患者相比,接受<20%稀薄液体的患者在随访期间进行胸部 X 射线检查的可能性较小(极小稀薄组为 10%,较大稀薄组为 48%,P=0.03)。在多变量逻辑回归中,在控制潜在肺病、吸入、喂养方式(推注或连续喂养)、胃底折叠术状态和口服摄入状态后,这种关系仍然显著。

结论

本研究表明,接受搅拌机管饲的患者接受了广泛不同量的添加稀薄液体,如水分。将水加入管饲,虽然通常是为了补水,但可以改变喂养物的黏度和临床结局,如胸部 X 射线的表现。

相似文献

1
Effect of Added Free Water to Enteral Tube Feeds in Children Receiving Commercial Blends.添加游离水对接受商业配方管饲喂养儿童的影响。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022 Mar 1;74(3):419-423. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003308.
2
Viscosity of Commercial Food-based Formulas and Home-prepared Blenderized Feeds.商业食品配方和家庭自制搅拌喂养物的黏度。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020 Jun;70(6):e124-e128. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002657.
3
Efficacy and Tolerance of Blended Diets in Children Receiving Gastrostomy Feeds.经胃造口喂养患儿的混合饮食的疗效和耐受性。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;35(2):282-288. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10406. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
4
Stir, Shake or Blend: A Comparison of Methods Used to Reduce Viscosity of Blenderized Tube Feedings.搅拌、摇晃还是混合:比较降低管饲匀浆黏度的方法
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022 Jul 1;75(1):110-112. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003479. Epub 2022 May 27.
5
Blenderized Enteral Nutrition Diet Study: Feasibility, Clinical, and Microbiome Outcomes of Providing Blenderized Feeds Through a Gastric Tube in a Medically Complex Pediatric Population.经搅拌机处理的肠内营养饮食研究:在医疗状况复杂的儿科人群中,通过胃管提供经搅拌机处理的喂养的可行性、临床和微生物组学结果。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2018 Aug;42(6):1046-1060. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1049. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
6
Effect of blenderized tube feeds on gastric emptying: A retrospective cohort study.肠内营养混合液对胃排空的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2023 Jul;47(5):654-661. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2513. Epub 2023 May 31.
7
Thickness of commercial blenderized formulas adversely affects successful delivery via enteral feeding pumps.商业配方的厚度会对肠内喂养泵的输送效果产生负面影响。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2023 Dec;38(6):1354-1359. doi: 10.1002/ncp.11007. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
8
Comparison of Home-Blenderized Formula and Commercial Enteral Formulas for Gastrostomy Tube-Fed Children: A Retrospective, Prospective Cohort Study.家庭自制匀浆膳与市售肠内营养制剂用于胃造口管饲儿童的比较:一项回顾性、前瞻性队列研究。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 21;15(4):e37944. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37944. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
Health Outcomes and Quality of Life Indices of Children Receiving Blenderized Feeds via Enteral Tube.经肠管给予匀浆膳的患儿的健康结局和生活质量指标。
J Pediatr. 2019 Aug;211:139-145.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.04.023. Epub 2019 May 23.
10
Fundoplication and gastrostomy versus image-guided gastrojejunal tube for enteral feeding in neurologically impaired children with gastroesophageal reflux.胃底折叠术与胃造口术对比影像引导下胃空肠管用于神经功能受损的胃食管反流儿童的肠内喂养
J Pediatr Surg. 2002 Mar;37(3):407-12. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.30849.

引用本文的文献

1
Gastrointestinal factors associated with risk of bronchiectasis in children.与儿童支气管扩张症风险相关的胃肠道因素。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023 Mar;58(3):899-907. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26276. Epub 2022 Dec 20.