• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索者小组的可行性评估:确定在安全的精神科住院环境中由患者主导的研究小组的可接受性和潜在结果。

A feasibility evaluation of Discovery Group: determining the acceptability and potential outcomes of a patient-led research group in a secure mental health inpatient setting.

作者信息

Aboaja Anne, Atewogboye Oluwatosin, Arslan Mudassar, Parry-Newton Lucia, Wilson Lindsey

机构信息

Forensic Service, Roseberry Park Hospital, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.

Mental Health and Addictions Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 25;7(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00310-0.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-021-00310-0
PMID:34563267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8465701/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) is recognised as an essential part of health research. In addition to providing an opportunity for patients to shape health research and acquire research skills, in the inpatient mental health setting, PPIE may have additional value in providing meaningful activity and enhancing recovery, as defined using connectedness, hope, identity, meaning and empowerment (CHIME) principles. However, there have been challenges in applying PPIE principles in secure mental health inpatient settings. An eight -session PPIE programme ("Discovery Group") was designed to support patient-led research in a secure mental health hospital. This feasibility study aims to evaluate the acceptability of the programme from the perspective of patients and identify potential outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective single-arm post-programme evaluation of Discovery Group was undertaken. Participants attended an evaluation workshop where they were interviewed individually to complete an acceptability questionnaire designed using the domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Participants also completed an outcomes questionnaire, which included CHIME-based recovery items, and were invited to share their ideas for programme improvement on posters. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Direct content analysis was applied to qualitative data.

RESULTS

In our sample, eight participants attended at least one session of the discovery group with one patient attending all sessions. Most of the participants felt positive about taking part in the group and expressed interest in joining another group in future. All participants experienced some burden from the effort required during group sessions, but a low level of opportunity cost in terms of the extent to which they perceived they had to forfeit benefits to participate in the programme.. Some described the group as effective in helping them learn about research. Of the five CHIME recovery domains, only connectedness was reported as a benefit of the group. The participants valued the opportunity to use their time well and demonstrate that they were undertaking purposeful activity as part of their rehabilitation and recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Discovery Group is a tool to overcome barriers to effective PPIE in research in a secure inpatient mental health setting. The programme has a high level of acceptability among participants and offered several potential outcomes which require testing through further study.

摘要

背景

患者及公众参与和介入(PPIE)被视为健康研究的重要组成部分。除了为患者提供塑造健康研究及获取研究技能的机会外,在住院精神卫生环境中,按照关联、希望、身份认同、意义和赋权(CHIME)原则的定义,PPIE在提供有意义的活动及促进康复方面可能具有额外价值。然而,在安全的精神卫生住院环境中应用PPIE原则存在挑战。一个为期八节的PPIE项目(“探索小组”)旨在支持一家安全的精神卫生医院中由患者主导的研究。这项可行性研究旨在从患者角度评估该项目的可接受性,并确定潜在结果。

方法

对探索小组进行了一项回顾性单臂项目后评估。参与者参加了一次评估研讨会,在会上他们接受了单独访谈,以完成一份根据可接受性理论框架的领域设计的可接受性问卷。参与者还完成了一份结果问卷,其中包括基于CHIME的康复项目,并被邀请在海报上分享他们对项目改进的想法。对定量数据进行描述性分析。对定性数据应用直接内容分析。

结果

在我们的样本中,八名参与者至少参加了探索小组的一次会议,一名患者参加了所有会议。大多数参与者对参加该小组持积极态度,并表示有兴趣未来参加另一个小组。所有参与者都因小组会议所需努力而感到有些负担,但就他们认为为参与该项目而不得不放弃利益的程度而言,机会成本较低。一些人将该小组描述为有效地帮助他们了解研究。在CHIME康复的五个领域中,只有关联被报告为该小组的一项益处。参与者重视有机会充分利用时间,并证明他们作为康复和恢复的一部分正在进行有目的的活动。

结论

探索小组是克服安全的住院精神卫生环境中研究有效PPIE障碍的一种工具。该项目在参与者中具有较高的可接受性,并提供了几个需要通过进一步研究进行检验的潜在结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afd3/8465701/2ea1fdc528c6/40900_2021_310_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afd3/8465701/2ea1fdc528c6/40900_2021_310_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afd3/8465701/2ea1fdc528c6/40900_2021_310_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A feasibility evaluation of Discovery Group: determining the acceptability and potential outcomes of a patient-led research group in a secure mental health inpatient setting.探索者小组的可行性评估:确定在安全的精神科住院环境中由患者主导的研究小组的可接受性和潜在结果。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 25;7(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00310-0.
2
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
3
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.INSCHOOL项目:展示源自患者及公众参与(PPIE)工作的参与式定性方法,该工作针对患有长期健康状况的年轻人开展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.
4
Behavioural activation therapy for post-stroke depression: the BEADS feasibility RCT.行为激活疗法治疗脑卒中后抑郁:BEADS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(47):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta23470.
5
A group memory rehabilitation programme for people with traumatic brain injuries: the ReMemBrIn RCT.创伤性脑损伤患者的团体记忆康复方案:ReMemBrIn RCT 研究
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Apr;23(16):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta23160.
6
To summarise the approach to and findings of the PPIE undertaken as part of a programme of secondary research with a vulnerable, hard to reach population during the COVID-19 pandemic.总结在新冠疫情期间,针对弱势群体这一难以接触的人群开展的二次研究项目的一部分——患者和公众参与及参与式评价(PPIE)的方法和结果。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 May 10;9(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00416-7.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
An intervention to improve outcomes of falls in dementia: the DIFRID mixed-methods feasibility study.一项旨在改善痴呆症患者跌倒结局的干预措施:DIFRID 混合方法可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(59):1-208. doi: 10.3310/hta23590.
9
Personal recovery and its challenges in forensic mental health: systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature.法医精神卫生领域的个人康复及其挑战:定性文献的系统评价与主题综合
BJPsych Open. 2021 Dec 17;8(1):e17. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.1068.
10
Establishment of a patient and public involvement and engagement group to support clinical trials in Pakistan: Initial lessons learned.成立患者及公众参与和介入小组以支持巴基斯坦的临床试验:初步经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 27;10(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00635-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Led Research to Develop a Training Programme for Restoring Musical Joy in Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Reflexive Process Evaluation.患者主导的研究,旨在为人工耳蜗植入者开发一项恢复音乐愉悦感的培训计划:反思性过程评估。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14133. doi: 10.1111/hex.14133.
2
PPIE in a technical research study: Using public involvement to refine the concept and understanding and move towards a multidimensional concept of disability.在一项技术研究中使用公众参与来完善概念和理解,并朝着残疾的多维概念发展。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14072. doi: 10.1111/hex.14072.

本文引用的文献

1
Involving service users to identify research priorities in a UK forensic mental health service.让服务使用者参与确定英国法医精神卫生服务中的研究重点。
BJPsych Bull. 2021 Dec;45(6):321-326. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2020.131.
2
Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new vision for the future.审查公众参与 NIHR 研究的进展:为未来制定和实施新愿景。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 30;8(7):e017124. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017124.
3
Best practice framework for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in collaborative data analysis of qualitative mental health research: methodology development and refinement.
患者和公众参与(PPI)在定性心理健康研究协作数据分析中的最佳实践框架:方法学的发展和完善。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1794-8.
4
Patients' motivations and interest in research: characteristics of volunteers for patient-led projects on PatientsLikeMe.患者参与研究的动机和兴趣:PatientsLikeMe上患者主导项目的志愿者特征。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Dec 9;2:33. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0047-6. eCollection 2016.
5
Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework.医疗保健干预措施的可接受性:综述概述及理论框架的构建
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8.
6
Impact on the individual: what do patients and carers gain, lose and expect from being involved in research?对个人的影响:患者和护理人员参与研究能获得什么、失去什么以及期望得到什么?
J Ment Health. 2016;25(1):28-35. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1101424. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
7
Developing and evaluating guidelines for patient and public involvement (PPI) in research.制定和评估患者及公众参与研究的指南。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(2):141-55. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2014-0001.
8
Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis.心理健康中个人康复的概念框架:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):445-52. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733.
9
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.