Suppr超能文献

让服务使用者参与确定英国法医精神卫生服务中的研究重点。

Involving service users to identify research priorities in a UK forensic mental health service.

作者信息

Aboaja Anne, Forsyth Bunny, Bates Helen, Wood Robert

机构信息

Roseberry Park Hospital, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

出版信息

BJPsych Bull. 2021 Dec;45(6):321-326. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2020.131.

Abstract

AIMS AND METHOD

Patient and public involvement (PPI) is a priority for health research. PPI improves the relevance and quality of research. The study aimed to involve service users in identifying research priorities for the service. A two-phase adapted Delphi technique was used to generate a list of research topics from service users in secure in-patient mental health settings and on specialist mental health prison wings. Topic content analysis was undertaken. Service users were further consulted, and research themes were ranked in order of priority.

RESULTS

Of the eight research themes identified, the three given the highest priority by service users were, in descending order, physical health, future plans and moving on, and causes of illness and crime.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Service users are willing to be involved in setting research priorities for mental health services. Through non-tokenistic PPI, service users can uniquely shape the research agenda of mental health services.

摘要

目的与方法

患者及公众参与(PPI)是健康研究的重点。PPI可提高研究的相关性和质量。该研究旨在让服务使用者参与确定该服务的研究重点。采用两阶段适应性德尔菲技术,从安全的住院心理健康机构和专业心理健康监狱病房的服务使用者中生成一份研究主题清单。进行了主题内容分析。进一步咨询了服务使用者,并按优先顺序对研究主题进行了排序。

结果

在确定的八个研究主题中,服务使用者给予最高优先级的三个主题依次为身体健康、未来计划与继续前行以及疾病与犯罪的成因。

临床意义

服务使用者愿意参与确定心理健康服务的研究重点。通过非象征性的PPI,服务使用者能够独特地塑造心理健康服务的研究议程。

相似文献

1
Involving service users to identify research priorities in a UK forensic mental health service.
BJPsych Bull. 2021 Dec;45(6):321-326. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2020.131.
2
Involving the public in mental health and learning disability research: Can we, should we, do we?
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;24(8):570-579. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12404. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
3
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
4
Service-user involvement in forensic mental health care research: areas to consider when developing a collaborative study.
J Ment Health. 2011 Oct;20(5):464-72. doi: 10.3109/09638231003728109. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
9
A national research agenda for pre-hospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi-study.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Jan 8;24:2. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0195-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Tackling obesity in mental health secure units: a mixed method synthesis of available evidence.
BJPsych Open. 2018 Jul 24;4(4):294-301. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.26. eCollection 2018 Jul.
6
Involving the public in mental health and learning disability research: Can we, should we, do we?
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;24(8):570-579. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12404. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
7
Research Priorities in Mental Health, Justice, and Safety: A Multidisciplinary Stakeholder Report.
Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2015 Jul 3;14(3):205-217. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2015.1073197. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
9
A devolved model for public involvement in the field of mental health research: case study learning.
Health Expect. 2016 Dec;19(6):1302-1311. doi: 10.1111/hex.12426. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
10
Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;49(10):887-97. doi: 10.1177/0004867415600891. Epub 2015 Aug 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验