Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, 10 Buangkok View, 539747, Singapore.
Department of Occupational Therapy, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore; Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Dec 1;295:1445-1448. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.023. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
Social cognition as a transdiagnostic construct between major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia (SCZ) is not well understood. This may be attributed to the variability of social cognitive measures indexing the same construct. This study aims to compare emotion recognition and theory of mind domains, known to be impaired in SCZ, between MDD and SCZ.
Three groups of participants (N = 150) were enrolled in this study: MDD (n = 51), SCZ (n = 50) and healthy controls (HC; n = 49). Emotion recognition was assessed on the Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task (BLERT) and Penn Emotion Recognition Task (ER40); theory of mind was measured on The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT). Mixed ANCOVAs were utilised to compare social cognitive performance across the groups.
SCZ performed poorer in all 3 social cognition tasks compared to both MDD and HC. No statistically significant difference in social cognitive performance was observed between MDD and HC.
This study serves as an effort towards employing the same standardised social cognitive measures for direct comparison of performance patterns across diagnostic groups. Future work is needed to extend this in larger samples of different illness severity and diagnostic categories.
社会认知作为一种跨诊断的结构,存在于重度抑郁症(MDD)和精神分裂症(SCZ)之间,但目前对此的了解还不够深入。这可能归因于同一结构的社会认知测量指标存在差异。本研究旨在比较 MDD 和 SCZ 中已知受损的情绪识别和心理理论领域。
这项研究纳入了三组参与者(N=150):MDD(n=51)、SCZ(n=50)和健康对照组(HC;n=49)。情绪识别在 Bell Lysaker 情绪识别任务(BLERT)和宾夕法尼亚情绪识别任务(ER40)上进行评估;心理理论通过社会推理测试(TASIT)进行测量。采用混合方差分析比较了三个组的社会认知表现。
与 MDD 和 HC 相比,SCZ 在所有 3 项社会认知任务中的表现都较差。MDD 和 HC 之间的社会认知表现没有统计学上的显著差异。
这项研究旨在采用相同的标准化社会认知测量方法,以便直接比较不同诊断组的表现模式。未来需要在更大的不同疾病严重程度和诊断类别的样本中进行扩展。