Suppr超能文献

基于两个供应商的纵向筛查队列中数字乳腺断层合成图像的乳腺实质的功率谱分析。

Power Spectrum Analysis of Breast Parenchyma with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images in a Longitudinal Screening Cohort from Two Vendors.

机构信息

Division of Diagnostic Imaging Physics, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2022 Jun;29(6):841-850. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.08.014. Epub 2021 Sep 23.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To quantitatively compare breast parenchymal texture between two Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) vendors using images from the same patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive patients who had normal screening DBT exams performed in January 2018 from GE and normal screening DBT exams in adjacent years from Hologic. Power spectrum analysis was performed within the breast tissue region. The slope of a linear function between log-frequency and log-power, β, was derived as a quantitative measure of breast texture and compared within and across vendors along with secondary parameters (laterality, view, year, image format, and breast density) with correlation tests and t-tests.

RESULTS

A total of 24,339 DBT slices or synthetic 2D images from 85 exams in 25 women were analyzed. Strong power-law behavior was verified from all images. Values of β d did not differ significantly for laterality, view, or year. Significant differences of β were observed across vendors for DBT images (Hologic: 3.4±0.2 vs GE: 3.1±0.2, 95% CI on difference: 0.27 to 0.30) and synthetic 2D images (Hologic: 2.7±0.3 vs GE: 3.0±0.2, 95% CI on difference: -0.36 to -0.27), and density groups with each vendor: scattered (GE: 3.0±0.3, Hologic: 3.3±0.3) vs. heterogeneous (GE: 3.2±0.2, Hologic: 3.4±0.1), 95% CI (-0.27, -0.08) and (-0.21, -0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSION

There are quantitative differences in the presentation of breast imaging texture between DBT vendors and across breast density categories. Our findings have relevance and importance for development and optimization of AI algorithms related to breast density assessment and cancer detection.

摘要

背景和目的

使用来自同一位患者的图像,定量比较两种数字乳腺断层摄影术(DBT)供应商的乳腺实质纹理。

材料和方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2018 年 1 月接受 GE 正常筛查 DBT 检查和相邻年份接受 Hologic 正常筛查 DBT 检查的连续患者。在乳腺组织区域内进行功率谱分析。通过对数频率和对数功率之间的线性函数的斜率,β,作为乳腺纹理的定量测量,并与相关性测试和 t 检验一起在供应商内部和之间以及次要参数(侧别、视图、年份、图像格式和乳腺密度)进行比较。

结果

共分析了 25 名女性 85 次检查的 24339 个 DBT 切片或合成二维图像。所有图像均验证了较强的幂律行为。β d 值在侧别、视图或年份方面没有显著差异。在供应商之间,DBT 图像(Hologic:3.4±0.2 vs GE:3.1±0.2,差异的 95%置信区间:0.27 至 0.30)和合成二维图像(Hologic:2.7±0.3 vs GE:3.0±0.2,差异的 95%置信区间:-0.36 至-0.27)以及每个供应商的密度组之间存在显著差异:散在(GE:3.0±0.3,Hologic:3.3±0.3)与异质(GE:3.2±0.2,Hologic:3.4±0.1),95%置信区间(-0.27,-0.08)和(-0.21,-0.05)。

结论

DBT 供应商之间以及乳腺密度类别之间乳腺成像纹理的呈现存在定量差异。我们的发现对于与乳腺密度评估和癌症检测相关的人工智能算法的开发和优化具有相关性和重要性。

相似文献

2

本文引用的文献

2
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Concepts and Clinical Practice.数字乳腺断层合成:概念与临床实践。
Radiology. 2019 Jul;292(1):1-14. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019180760. Epub 2019 May 14.
4
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.数字化乳腺断层合成:技术现状
Radiology. 2015 Dec;277(3):663-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015141303.
7
9
Age-related changes in mammographic density and breast cancer risk.年龄相关的乳腺密度变化与乳腺癌风险。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Jul 1;178(1):101-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws446. Epub 2013 May 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验