Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA; The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and the Dartmouth Institute of Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
GI Quality Improvement Consortium, Ltd, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Feb;95(2):360-367.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.027. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
Endoscopist recommendations regarding a repeat colonoscopy after inadequate bowel cleanliness have not been fully described. Our aim was to evaluate the timing of recommendations for repeat colonoscopy after inadequate bowel preparation using a large, national colonoscopy registry.
We performed a cross-sectional analysis of all outpatient screening and surveillance colonoscopies among adults ages 50 to 75 reported in the GI Quality Improvement Consortium from 2011 to 2018. The primary outcome was a recommendation to repeat colonoscopy within 1 year. Secondary outcomes were recommendations based on indication of colonoscopy and colonoscopy findings and predictors of a recommendation to follow-up within 1 year.
There were 260,314 colonoscopies with inadequate bowel preparation performed at 672 different sites by 4001 endoscopists. Of these, 31.9% contained a recommendation for follow-up within 1 year. This did not differ meaningfully by examination indication. The severity of colonoscopy findings influenced the recommendations for follow-up (within 1 year in 84.0% of cases with adenocarcinoma, 51.8% with any advanced lesion, and 23.2% with 1-2 small adenomas). Younger age, more severe pathology, location in the Northeast, and performance by an endoscopist with an adenoma detection rate ≥25% were associated with recommendations for follow-up within 1 year.
Only some colonoscopies with inadequate bowel preparation are recommended to be repeated within 1 year, which may have implications for potential missed lesions. Further understanding of reasons driving recommendations is an important next step to improving guideline-concordant colonoscopy practice.
内镜医师关于肠道清洁不充分后重复结肠镜检查的建议尚未充分描述。我们的目的是使用大型国家结肠镜检查登记处评估肠道准备不充分后重复结肠镜检查的建议时机。
我们对 2011 年至 2018 年 GI 质量改进联盟报告的 50 至 75 岁成年人的所有门诊筛查和监测结肠镜检查进行了横断面分析。主要结局是在 1 年内建议重复结肠镜检查。次要结局是基于结肠镜检查指征和结肠镜检查结果的建议,以及 1 年内建议随访的预测因素。
在 672 个不同地点由 4001 名内镜医生进行了 260314 例肠道准备不充分的结肠镜检查。其中,31.9%的病例建议在 1 年内进行随访。这与检查指征没有明显差异。结肠镜检查结果的严重程度影响随访建议(在腺癌病例中,84.0%建议在 1 年内进行随访,任何高级病变为 51.8%,1-2 个小腺瘤为 23.2%)。年龄较小、更严重的病理、东北部地区的位置以及腺瘤检出率≥25%的内镜医生进行操作与 1 年内建议随访相关。
只有少数肠道准备不充分的结肠镜检查建议在 1 年内重复进行,这可能会导致潜在的漏诊。进一步了解推动建议的原因是改善符合指南的结肠镜检查实践的重要下一步。