Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Clinical Epidemiology and Comparative Effectiveness Program, Section of Health Services Research (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
J Hepatol. 2022 Feb;76(2):294-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Guidelines recommend hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in patients with chronic HBV infection. Several HCC risk prediction models are available to guide surveillance decisions, but their comparative performance remains unclear.
Using a retrospective cohort of patients with HBV treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues at 130 Veterans Administration facilities between 9/1/2008 and 12/31/2018, we calculated risk scores from 10 HCC risk prediction models (REACH-B, PAGE-B, m-PAGE-B, CU-HCC, HCC-RESCUE, CAMD, APA-B, REAL-B, AASL-HCC, RWS-HCC). We estimated the models' discrimination and calibration. We calculated HCC incidence in risk categories defined by the reported cut-offs for all models.
Of 3,101 patients with HBV (32.2% with cirrhosis), 47.0% were treated with entecavir, 40.6% tenofovir, and 12.4% received both. During a median follow-up of 4.5 years, 113 patients developed HCC at an incidence of 0.75/100 person-years. AUC values for 3-year HCC risk were the highest for RWS-HCC, APA-B, REAL-B, and AASL-HCC (all >0.80). Of these, 3 (APA-B, RWS-HCC, REAL-B) incorporated alpha-fetoprotein. AUC values for the other models ranged from 0.73 for PAGE-B to 0.79 for CAMD and HCC-RESCUE. Of the 7 models with AUC >0.75, only APA-B was poorly calibrated. In total, 10-20% of the cohort was deemed low-risk based on the published cut-offs. None of the patients in the low-risk groups defined by PAGE-B, m-PAGE-B, AASL-HCC, and REAL-B developed HCC during the study timeframe.
In this national cohort of US-based patients with HBV on antiviral treatment, most models performed well in predicting HCC risk. A low-risk group, in which no cases of HCC occurred within a 3-year timeframe, was identified by several models (PAGE-B, m-PAGE-B, CAMD, AASL-HCC, REAL-B). Further studies are warranted to examine whether these patients could be excluded from HCC surveillance.
Risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) could guide HCC surveillance decisions. In this large cohort of US-based patients receiving treatment for HBV, most published models discriminated between those who did or did not develop HCC, although the RWS-HCC, REAL-B, and AASL-HCC performed the best. If confirmed in future studies, these models could help identify a low-risk subset of patients on antiviral treatment who could be excluded from HCC surveillance.
指南建议对慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染者进行肝细胞癌(HCC)监测。有多种 HCC 风险预测模型可用于指导监测决策,但它们的比较性能仍不清楚。
使用在 2008 年 9 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间在 130 个退伍军人事务部设施接受核苷(酸)类似物治疗的 HBV 患者的回顾性队列,我们从 10 个 HCC 风险预测模型(REACH-B、PAGE-B、m-PAGE-B、CU-HCC、HCC-RESCUE、CAMD、APA-B、REAL-B、AASL-HCC、RWS-HCC)中计算风险评分。我们估计了这些模型的区分度和校准度。我们根据所有模型报告的截止值来计算风险类别中的 HCC 发生率。
在 3101 名 HBV 患者(32.2%合并肝硬化)中,47.0%接受恩替卡韦治疗,40.6%接受替诺福韦治疗,12.4%接受两种药物治疗。在中位随访 4.5 年期间,113 名患者 HCC 发病率为 0.75/100 人年。RWS-HCC、APA-B、REAL-B 和 AASL-HCC 的 3 年 HCC 风险 AUC 值最高(均>0.80)。其中,3 个(APA-B、RWS-HCC、REAL-B)纳入了甲胎蛋白。其他模型的 AUC 值范围从 PAGE-B 的 0.73 到 CAMD 和 HCC-RESCUE 的 0.79。在 AUC>0.75 的 7 个模型中,只有 APA-B 的校准效果较差。基于发表的截止值,队列中有 10%-20%的患者被认为是低风险。在研究期间,PAGE-B、m-PAGE-B、AASL-HCC 和 REAL-B 定义的低风险组中没有患者发生 HCC。
在这项针对美国接受抗病毒治疗的 HBV 患者的全国性队列研究中,大多数模型在预测 HCC 风险方面表现良好。通过多个模型(PAGE-B、m-PAGE-B、CAMD、AASL-HCC、REAL-B)确定了一个低风险组,在 3 年内没有发生 HCC 的病例。需要进一步的研究来检验这些患者是否可以排除 HCC 监测。
非专业人士直译可能存在错漏,仅供参考。