Chen Chao-Hsuan, Tu Chih-Hsiu, Chen Der-Cherng, Huang Hsiang-Ming, Chuang Hao-Yu, Cho Der-Yang, Bau Da-Tian, Lee Han-Chung
Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Department of Neurosurgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan.
Medicines (Basel). 2021 Sep 2;8(9):50. doi: 10.3390/medicines8090050.
This study aims to elucidate the radiological outcome after Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation and whether dual-threaded (DT) screws should be used in the fusion surgery. 159 patients with degenerative lumbar disorder who had undergone midline lumbar inter-body fusion surgery by CBT screw-fixation technique (2014 to 2018). Patient subgroups were based on single-threaded (ST) or DT screw, fixation length, as well as whether fixation involved to sacrum level (S1). Serial dynamic plain films were reviewed and an appearance of a halo phenomenon between screw-bone interfaces was identified as a case of screw loosening. 29 patients (39.7%) in ST group and 10 patients (11.6%) in DT group demonstrated a halo phenomenon ( < 0.0001 ****). After subgrouping with fixation length, the incidence rates of a halo phenomenon in each group were 11.1%:3% (ST-1L vs. DT-1L), 37%:13.8% (ST-2L vs. DT-2L), and 84.2%:23.5% (ST-3L vs. DT-3L). Among the 85 patients with a fixation involved in S1, 26 patients (52%) with single-threaded screw (STS group) and 8 patients (22.8%) with dual-threaded screw (DTS group) demonstrated a halo appearance ( = 0.0078 **). After subgrouping the fixation level, the incidence of a halo appearance in each group was 25%:0% (STS-1L vs. DTS-1L), 40.9%:26.3% (STS-2L vs. DTS-2L), and 87.5%: 30% (STS-3L vs. DTS-3L). Both fixation length and whether fixation involved to S1 contribute to the incidence of screw loosening, the data supports clinical evidence that DT screws had greater fixation strength with an increased fixative stability and lower incidence of screw loosening in CBT screw fixation compared with ST screws. 2.
本研究旨在阐明皮质骨轨迹(CBT)螺钉固定后的放射学结果,以及在融合手术中是否应使用双螺纹(DT)螺钉。159例患有退行性腰椎疾病的患者接受了采用CBT螺钉固定技术的腰椎中线椎间融合手术(2014年至2018年)。患者亚组基于单螺纹(ST)或DT螺钉、固定长度以及固定是否涉及骶骨水平(S1)。回顾了系列动态平片,螺钉-骨界面之间出现晕圈现象被确定为螺钉松动病例。ST组29例患者(39.7%)和DT组10例患者(11.6%)出现晕圈现象(P<0.0001 ****)。按固定长度进行亚组分析后,每组晕圈现象的发生率分别为11.1%:3%(ST-1L vs. DT-1L)、37%:13.8%(ST-2L vs. DT-2L)和84.2%:23.5%(ST-3L vs. DT-3L)。在85例固定涉及S1的患者中,26例单螺纹螺钉患者(STS组)(52%)和8例双螺纹螺钉患者(DTS组)(22.8%)出现晕圈现象(P = 0.0078 **)。按固定水平进行亚组分析后,每组晕圈现象的发生率分别为25%:0%(STS-1L vs. DTS-1L)、40.9%:26.3%(STS-2L vs. DTS-2L)和87.5%: 30%(STS-3L vs. DTS-3L)。固定长度和固定是否涉及S1均与螺钉松动的发生率有关,数据支持临床证据,即与ST螺钉相比,DT螺钉在CBT螺钉固定中具有更高的固定强度、更高的固定稳定性和更低的螺钉松动发生率。2