Suppr超能文献

比较评估物理和化学蓝藻细胞裂解方法用于总微囊藻毒素-LR 分析。

Comparative Assessment of Physical and Chemical Cyanobacteria Cell Lysis Methods for Total Microcystin-LR Analysis.

机构信息

Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA), P.O. Box 99954, Las Vegas, NV 89193-9954, USA.

Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering Department, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC H3C 3A7, Canada.

出版信息

Toxins (Basel). 2021 Aug 26;13(9):596. doi: 10.3390/toxins13090596.

Abstract

Standardization and validation of alternative cell lysis methods used for quantifying total cyanotoxins is needed to improve laboratory response time goals for total cyanotoxin analysis. In this study, five cell lysis methods (i.e., probe sonication, microwave, freeze-thaw, chemical lysis with Abraxis QuikLyse, and chemical lysis with copper sulfate) were assessed using laboratory-cultured () cells. Methods were evaluated for destruction of cells (as determined by optical density of the sample) and recovery of total microcystin-LR (MC-LR) using three cell densities (i.e., 1 × 10 cells/mL (low-density), 1 × 10 cells/mL (medium-density), and 1 × 10 cells/mL (high-density)). Of the physical lysis methods, both freeze-thaw (1 to 5 cycles) and pulsed probe sonication (2 to 10 min) resulted in >80% destruction of cells and consistent (>80%) release and recovery of intracellular MC-LR. Microwave (3 to 5 min) did not demonstrate the same decrease in optical density (<50%), although it provided effective release and recovery of >80% intracellular MC-LR. Abraxis QuikLyse was similarly effective for intracellular MC-LR recovery across the different cell densities. Copper sulfate (up to 500 mg/L Cu) did not lyse cells nor release intracellular MC-LR within 20 min. None of the methods appeared to cause degradation of MC-LR. Probe sonication, microwave, and Abraxis QuikLyse served as rapid lysis methods (within minutes) with varying associated costs, while freeze-thaw provided a viable, low-cost alternative if time permits.

摘要

需要对用于定量总蓝藻毒素的替代细胞裂解方法进行标准化和验证,以提高总蓝藻毒素分析的实验室响应时间目标。在这项研究中,使用实验室培养的 () 细胞评估了五种细胞裂解方法(探针超声、微波、冻融、阿布拉克斯快速裂解化学裂解和硫酸铜化学裂解)。方法通过样品的光密度评估细胞的破坏程度,并用三种细胞密度(即 1×10 个细胞/ml(低密度)、1×10 个细胞/ml(中密度)和 1×10 个细胞/ml(高密度)评估总微囊藻毒素-LR(MC-LR)的回收情况。在物理裂解方法中,冻融(1 到 5 个循环)和脉冲探针超声(2 到 10 分钟)均导致 >80%的细胞破坏,并始终保持 >80%的细胞内 MC-LR 的释放和回收。微波(3 到 5 分钟)没有表现出相同的光密度降低(<50%),尽管它提供了有效的释放和回收 >80%的细胞内 MC-LR。阿布拉克斯快速裂解在不同的 细胞密度下对细胞内 MC-LR 的回收同样有效。硫酸铜(高达 500mg/L Cu)在 20 分钟内既不能裂解细胞,也不能释放细胞内 MC-LR。这些方法都没有导致 MC-LR 降解。探针超声、微波和阿布拉克斯快速裂解是快速裂解方法(在几分钟内),但成本不同,而冻融如果时间允许,则提供了一种可行的低成本替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a45/8473049/9322fdff1ecd/toxins-13-00596-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验