Eisenstadt Amelia, Liverpool Shaun, Metaxa Athina-Marina, Ciuvat Roberta Maria, Carlsson Courtney
Evidence Based Practice Unit, University College London and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Nov 1;5(11):e31064. doi: 10.2196/31064.
There is growing evidence suggesting that the emotional well-being of the public has been negatively affected in the past year. Consequently, demand for well-being support has increased. Although there is substantial empirical support for mental health apps that target diagnosed conditions, there is less research on emotional well-being apps. Among existing well-being apps, few studies have been conducted on apps that are based on lived experience and those that seek to enhance users' understanding of their emotional patterns. Thus, the acceptability of these novel apps requires further evaluation before upscaling.
This evaluation aims to describe the acceptability, engagement, and preliminary outcomes of using an app (Paradym) designed to promote emotional well-being and positive mental health.
This is a pre-post, mixed-methods, single-arm evaluation that is aggregated with digital analytics data. We anonymously collected real-world data on the demographics and well-being of the participants as well as the usability and acceptance of the app using validated questionnaires and open-ended questions. Participants tested the app for a minimum of 2 weeks before completing the follow-up measures. Google Analytics was used to record the level of app engagement. Chi-square and 2-tailed t tests were conducted to analyze quantitative data, and a thematic analysis approach was adopted for qualitative data.
A total of 115 participants completed baseline questionnaires, of which 79.1% (91/115) users downloaded the app. The sample was diverse in terms of ethnicity, including 43.4% (50/115) people who self-identified as belonging to minority ethnic groups. Most of the participants were female (78/115, 67.8%) and between the ages of 18 and 25 years (39/115, 33.9%). A total of 34 app users who completed questionnaires at baseline and follow-up provided valuable feedback to inform the future directions of Paradym. Favorable themes emerged describing the app's content, functionality, and underlying principles. Although usability feedback varied across items, a considerable number of participants (22/34, 64%) found that the app was easy to use. Google Analytics revealed that at least 79% (27/34) of people used the app daily. On the basis of preliminary observations, app users experience increased mental well-being. Post hoc analyses indicated that the reduction in depression scores (t=-2.16) and the increase in the well-being measures (t=2.87) were statistically significant. No adverse events were reported during the follow-up period.
The findings of this evaluation are encouraging and document positive preliminary evidence for the Paradym app.
越来越多的证据表明,过去一年公众的情绪健康受到了负面影响。因此,对幸福感支持的需求有所增加。尽管针对已确诊疾病的心理健康应用程序有大量实证支持,但针对情绪健康应用程序的研究较少。在现有的幸福感应用程序中,针对基于生活经验以及旨在增强用户对自身情绪模式理解的应用程序的研究很少。因此,在扩大规模之前,这些新型应用程序的可接受性需要进一步评估。
本评估旨在描述一款旨在促进情绪健康和积极心理健康的应用程序(Paradym)的可接受性、参与度和初步效果。
这是一项前后测、混合方法、单臂评估,并汇总了数字分析数据。我们使用经过验证的问卷和开放式问题,匿名收集了参与者的人口统计学和幸福感数据以及该应用程序的可用性和可接受性数据。参与者在完成后续测量之前至少测试该应用程序两周。使用谷歌分析记录应用程序的参与程度。进行卡方检验和双尾t检验以分析定量数据,对定性数据采用主题分析方法。
共有115名参与者完成了基线问卷,其中79.1%(91/115)的用户下载了该应用程序。样本在种族方面具有多样性,其中43.4%(50/115)的人自我认定属于少数族裔群体。大多数参与者为女性(78/115,67.8%),年龄在18至25岁之间(39/115,33.9%)。共有34名在基线和随访时完成问卷的应用程序用户提供了有价值的反馈,为Paradym的未来发展方向提供了参考。出现了描述该应用程序内容、功能及基本原则的积极主题。尽管可用性反馈因项目而异,但相当多的参与者(22/34,64%)发现该应用程序易于使用。谷歌分析显示,至少79%(27/34)的人每天使用该应用程序。基于初步观察,应用程序用户的心理健康状况有所改善。事后分析表明,抑郁得分的降低(t=-2.16)和幸福感测量得分的增加(t=2.87)具有统计学意义。随访期间未报告不良事件。
本评估结果令人鼓舞,为Paradym应用程序提供了积极的初步证据。