• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异方差世界中的人类选择性停止。

Human optional stopping in a heteroscedastic world.

作者信息

Tickle Hannah, Tsetsos Konstantinos, Speekenbrink Maarten, Summerfield Christopher

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology.

Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2023 Jan;130(1):1-22. doi: 10.1037/rev0000315. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1037/rev0000315
PMID:34570524
Abstract

When making decisions, animals must trade off the benefits of information harvesting against the opportunity cost of prolonged deliberation. Deciding when to stop accumulating information and commit to a choice is challenging in natural environments, where the reliability of decision-relevant information may itself vary unpredictably over time (variable variance or "heteroscedasticity"). We asked humans to perform a categorization task in which discrete, continuously valued samples (oriented gratings) arrived in series until the observer made a choice. Human behavior was best described by a model that adaptively weighted sensory signals by their inverse prediction error and integrated the resulting quantities with a linear urgency signal to a decision threshold. This model approximated the output of a Bayesian model that computed the full posterior probability of a correct response, and successfully predicted adaptive weighting of decision information in neural signals. Adaptive weighting of decision information may have evolved to promote optional stopping in heteroscedastic natural environments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

在做决策时,动物必须在收集信息的益处与长时间思考的机会成本之间进行权衡。在自然环境中,决定何时停止积累信息并做出选择具有挑战性,因为与决策相关的信息的可靠性本身可能会随时间发生不可预测的变化(可变方差或“异方差性”)。我们要求人类执行一项分类任务,在该任务中,离散的、连续取值的样本(定向光栅)依次出现,直到观察者做出选择。人类行为最好用一个模型来描述,该模型通过感官信号的逆预测误差对其进行自适应加权,并将结果量与线性紧急信号整合到决策阈值。这个模型近似于一个贝叶斯模型的输出,该贝叶斯模型计算正确反应的完整后验概率,并成功预测了神经信号中决策信息的自适应加权。决策信息的自适应加权可能已经进化,以促进在异方差自然环境中的最优停止。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Human optional stopping in a heteroscedastic world.异方差世界中的人类选择性停止。
Psychol Rev. 2023 Jan;130(1):1-22. doi: 10.1037/rev0000315. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
2
Evidence and Urgency Related EEG Signals during Dynamic Decision-Making in Humans.人类动态决策过程中的证据和紧迫性相关脑电图信号。
J Neurosci. 2021 Jun 30;41(26):5711-5722. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2551-20.2021. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Point estimate observers: A new class of models for perceptual decision making.点估计观察者:一类用于感知决策的新模型。
Psychol Rev. 2023 Mar;130(2):334-367. doi: 10.1037/rev0000402. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
4
The autocorrelated Bayesian sampler: A rational process for probability judgments, estimates, confidence intervals, choices, confidence judgments, and response times.自相关贝叶斯采样器:一种用于概率判断、估计、置信区间、选择、置信判断和反应时间的理性过程。
Psychol Rev. 2024 Mar;131(2):456-493. doi: 10.1037/rev0000427. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
5
Characterization of decision commitment rule alterations during an auditory change detection task.听觉变化检测任务中决策承诺规则改变的特征描述
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Nov 1;118(5):2526-2536. doi: 10.1152/jn.00071.2017. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
6
Characterizing the impact of category uncertainty on human auditory categorization behavior.刻画类别不确定性对人类听觉分类行为的影响。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Jul 17;10(7):e1003715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003715. eCollection 2014 Jul.
7
Urgency, leakage, and the relative nature of information processing in decision-making.紧迫性、泄漏和决策中信息处理的相对性质。
Psychol Rev. 2021 Jan;128(1):160-186. doi: 10.1037/rev0000255. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
8
Can natural selection encode Bayesian priors?自然选择能否编码贝叶斯先验概率?
J Theor Biol. 2017 Aug 7;426:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 May 20.
9
Integrating Categorization and Decision-Making.分类与决策的整合。
Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;47(1):e13235. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13235.
10
Adaptive behavior in optimal sequential search.最优序列搜索中的适应性行为。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Mar;152(3):657-692. doi: 10.1037/xge0001287. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurophysiological insights into sequential decision-making: exploring the secretary problem through ERPs and TBR dynamics.神经生理洞察序列决策:通过 ERP 和 TBR 动态探索秘书问题。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Apr 30;12(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01750-5.
2
The autocorrelated Bayesian sampler: A rational process for probability judgments, estimates, confidence intervals, choices, confidence judgments, and response times.自相关贝叶斯采样器:一种用于概率判断、估计、置信区间、选择、置信判断和反应时间的理性过程。
Psychol Rev. 2024 Mar;131(2):456-493. doi: 10.1037/rev0000427. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
3
In no uncertain terms: Group cohesion did not affect exploration and group decision making under low uncertainty.
毫不含糊地说:在低不确定性情况下,群体凝聚力并未影响探索和群体决策。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 25;14:1038262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1038262. eCollection 2023.
4
Environmental uncertainty and the advantage of impulsive choice strategies.环境不确定性与冲动选择策略的优势。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jan 30;19(1):e1010873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010873. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Control over sampling boosts numerical evidence processing in human decisions from experience.对采样的控制促进了基于经验的人类决策中的数字证据处理。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Dec 15;33(1):207-221. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac062.