Suppr超能文献

Readability, Quality, and Timeliness of Patient Online Health Resources for Contact Dermatitis and Patch Testing.

作者信息

De Devea R, Shih Terri, Katta Rajani, Hsiao Jennifer L, Shi Vivian Y

机构信息

From the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, NY.

David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

Dermatitis. 2022;33(2):155-160. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000789.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contact dermatitis (CD) causes significant impact on patient quality of life. It is the most common occupational skin disease, accounting for more than US $1 billion of medical costs. Patch testing (PT) is the criterion standard for diagnosis of allergic CD. Patients are increasingly using the Internet to obtain health information; however, the readability, quality, and timeliness of online health resources for CD and PT are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to determine the readability, quality, and timeliness of the most frequently accessed patient online health resources for CD and PT.

METHODS

A Google search was performed on March 20, 2021, using the terms "contact dermatitis," "contact eczema," "patch testing," and "patch test." Websites were evaluated using several well-validated tools/criteria.

RESULTS

Contact dermatitis and PT websites had only 2 of the 48 websites combined that met the recommended sixth-grade reading level for patients, with the majority characterized as "very poor" to "fair" quality. There was no correlation found between quality and readability of the CD and PT websites.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for improvement of online CD and PT health resources. Dermatologists should take the lead to vet websites and enhance online resources to improve patient care.

摘要

相似文献

2
A Hands-on Approach to Contact Dermatitis and Patch Testing.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jun;8(6):1883-1893. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
3
An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Feb;15(1):40.e1-40.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
4
Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 1;44(7):494-502. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002870.
5
Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.
World J Urol. 2018 Jun;36(6):985-992. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2179-9. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
6
Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Mar 1;19(2):115-120. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1219.
7
Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(2):272-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599814560338. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
10
Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Dec;25(12):1319-24. doi: 10.1111/clr.12285. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
An Objective Analysis of the Quality and Readability of Online Information on Breast Implant Illness.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 10;17(4):e82042. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82042. eCollection 2025 Apr.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验