• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估关于尿道下裂治疗的在线健康信息的可读性、质量和准确性。

An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.

机构信息

Division of Urology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, 89 Beaumont Ave, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.

Department of Urology, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospitals, 1825 Fourth St, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Feb;15(1):40.e1-40.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.020
PMID:30449679
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypospadias is one of the most common genital anomalies. Treatment of hypospadias requires surgical repair, usually in childhood. Patients are increasingly using the internet to learn more about their health or that of their children, which can often empower patients to make well-informed healthcare decisions.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate not only the readability but also the quality and accuracy of available online health information for the treatment of hypospadias.

STUDY DESIGN

Search terms for hypospadias treatment were queried on major search engines. Each website was classified into one of four categories: institutional, commercial, charitable organization, or personal website. Content on each website discussing treatment options was analyzed for readability using three readability formulas. A validated tool, the DISCERN instrument, was used to measure the quality of online health information regarding hypospadias treatment. Accuracy was independently assessed by two pediatric urologists on a 1-5 scale, in which 1 and 5 correspond to 0% and 100% of the information in the text being accurate, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 150 search engine results were acquired, of which 46 were analyzed for readability, quality, and accuracy. The mean readability scores across all websites were 14.89 (Gunning-Fog), 11.01 Simple Measure of Goddledygook (SMOG), and 8.44 (Dale-Chall), which correspond to an 11th- to 12th-grade reading level. Most websites (65.2%) were considered of 'good' quality. Readability and quality scores were not statistically different between website categories. Institutional and charitable websites had the highest mean accuracy scores (3.91 and 3.50, respectively), with institutional websites proving to have significantly more accurate information regarding hypospadias treatment than commercial websites (3.91 and 3.42, respectively; P = 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Pediatric urologists should know what information about hypospadias and its treatment exists on the Internet and understand if it is accurate and of good quality and, more importantly, if the material is written at a reading level comprehensible by the majority of parents. Limitations included analysis of only English-written websites regarding hypospadias treatment specifically, using search engines alone rather than other online resources, not evaluating online videos or illustrations, and not using more than two pediatric urologists for determining content accuracy.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that online health materials regarding hypospadias and its treatment are written at a level far greater than the reading level of most adults. Most websites were considered of adequate quality, and websites from institutions or references had significantly more accurate information than those from commercial websites.

摘要

背景

尿道下裂是最常见的生殖器畸形之一。尿道下裂的治疗需要手术修复,通常在儿童时期进行。患者越来越多地使用互联网来了解更多关于自己或孩子的健康信息,这通常使患者能够做出明智的医疗决策。

目的

本研究的目的不仅是评估在线治疗尿道下裂的健康信息的可读性,还评估其质量和准确性。

研究设计

在主要搜索引擎上查询尿道下裂治疗的检索词。每个网站都分为四类之一:机构、商业、慈善组织或个人网站。分析每个网站上讨论治疗选择的内容的可读性,使用三种可读性公式。使用经过验证的 DISCERN 工具衡量有关尿道下裂治疗的在线健康信息的质量。准确性由两名小儿泌尿科医生独立评估,1 分和 5 分分别对应文本中信息的准确性为 0%和 100%。

结果

共获得 150 个搜索引擎结果,其中 46 个用于分析可读性、质量和准确性。所有网站的平均可读性评分为 14.89(Gunning-Fog)、11.01 简单测语法难度(SMOG)和 8.44(Dale-Chall),分别对应 11 至 12 年级的阅读水平。大多数网站(65.2%)被认为质量“良好”。网站类别之间的可读性和质量评分没有统计学差异。机构和慈善网站的平均准确性评分最高(分别为 3.91 和 3.50),与商业网站相比,机构网站提供的有关尿道下裂治疗的信息准确性明显更高(分别为 3.91 和 3.42;P=0.001)。

讨论

小儿泌尿科医生应该了解互联网上存在哪些关于尿道下裂及其治疗的信息,并了解其是否准确且质量良好,更重要的是,材料的编写是否通俗易懂。本研究的局限性包括仅分析特定于尿道下裂治疗的英文网站、仅使用搜索引擎而不是其他在线资源、不评估在线视频或插图以及不使用两名以上小儿泌尿科医生来确定内容准确性。

结论

本研究表明,有关尿道下裂及其治疗的在线健康材料的编写水平远高于大多数成年人的阅读水平。大多数网站被认为质量良好,而来自机构或参考资料的网站比来自商业网站的信息准确性更高。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.评估关于尿道下裂治疗的在线健康信息的可读性、质量和准确性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Feb;15(1):40.e1-40.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
2
Assessment of readability and quality of patient education materials specific to nocturnal enuresis.评估特定于夜间遗尿症的患者教育材料的可读性和质量。
J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Oct;19(5):558.e1-558.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 4.
3
Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease.去伪存真:阴茎硬结症在线治疗健康信息的可读性、质量及准确性评估
Urology. 2018 Aug;118:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.02.054. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
4
Internet Health Resources on Nocturnal Enuresis: A Readability, Quality, and Accuracy Analysis.互联网夜遗尿资源:可读性、质量和准确性分析。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Feb;34(1):84-90. doi: 10.1055/a-2156-4833. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
5
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
6
Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.评估在线胰腺癌患者健康信息的准确性和可读性。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Sep 1;151(9):831-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0730.
7
Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.谷歌在线儿童青光眼信息的质量、可靠性、技术质量和可读性。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024 May-Jun;61(3):198-203. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20231114-01. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
8
Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.评估失败性脊柱手术后在线资源的质量、内容和可读性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 1;44(7):494-502. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002870.
9
Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.评估关于系统性红斑狼疮的在线健康信息的质量、可靠性和可读性。
Lupus. 2018 Oct;27(12):1911-1917. doi: 10.1177/0961203318793213. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
10
Accuracy, readability, and quality of websites about metastatic renal cell carcinoma treatment.转移性肾细胞癌治疗相关网站的准确性、可读性和质量。
Urol Oncol. 2024 Nov;42(11):375.e1-375.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.015. Epub 2024 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Readability assessment of Spanish online patient education materials in gynecologic oncology.妇科肿瘤学领域西班牙文在线患者教育材料的可读性评估
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2024 Dec 2;56:101548. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101548. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
ChatGPT Responses to Frequently Asked Questions on Ménière's Disease: A Comparison to Clinical Practice Guideline Answers.ChatGPT对梅尼埃病常见问题的回答:与临床实践指南答案的比较
OTO Open. 2024 Jul 5;8(3):e163. doi: 10.1002/oto2.163. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
3
A mobile application for postoperative education of caregivers of children with congenital hypospadias: Requirement analysis.
一款用于先天性尿道下裂患儿照顾者术后教育的移动应用程序:需求分析
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 11;7(3):e1942. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1942. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Clear as Mud: Readability Scores in Cloacal Exstrophy Literature and Its Treatment.晦涩难懂:泄殖腔外翻文献及其治疗中的可读性评分
Res Rep Urol. 2024 Feb 12;16:39-44. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S430744. eCollection 2024.
5
Should I freeze my sperm?-readability and quality of health resources for sperm banking.我应该冷冻我的精子吗?——精子库健康资源的可读性与质量
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Oct 31;12(10):1561-1567. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-120. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
6
Defining destigmatizing design guidelines for use in sexual health-related digital technologies: A Delphi study.制定用于性健康相关数字技术的消除污名化设计指南:一项德尔菲研究。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Jul 12;2(7):e0000223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000223. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Congenital Hand Differences.先天性手部差异在线患者教育资料的可读性。
Hand (N Y). 2024 Oct;19(7):1146-1153. doi: 10.1177/15589447231168907. Epub 2023 May 2.
8
Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient.阴茎假体植入的在线健康信息质量欠佳,普通美国患者难以读懂。
Cureus. 2023 Jan 26;15(1):e34240. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34240. eCollection 2023 Jan.
9
Incidence and Impact of Missing Functional Elements on Information Comprehension using Audio and Text.缺失功能元素对使用音频和文本进行信息理解的影响及发生率。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:697-706. eCollection 2021.
10
Online Information on Painful Sexual Dysfunction in Women: Quality Analysis of Websites in SPANISH about Dyspareunia, Vaginismus and Vulvodynia.女性性交疼痛性功能障碍在线信息:SPANISH 网站关于性交困难、阴道痉挛和外阴痛的质量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 28;19(3):1506. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031506.