• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

墨西哥塔帕楚拉伊蚊的杀虫剂抗药性:空间变异与对历史杀虫剂使用的反应。

Insecticide resistance in Aedes aegypti from Tapachula, Mexico: Spatial variation and response to historical insecticide use.

机构信息

Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Centro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública, Tapachula, Chiapas, México.

El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Tapachula, Tapachula, Chiapas, México.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Sep 27;15(9):e0009746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009746. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009746
PMID:34570792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8475978/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insecticide use continues as the main strategy to control Aedes aegypti, the vector of dengue, Zika, chikungunya, and yellow fever. In the city of Tapachula, Mexico, mosquito control programs switched from pyrethroids to organophosphates for outdoor spatial spraying in 2013. Additionally, the spraying scheme switched from total coverage to focused control, prioritizing areas with higher entomological-virological risk. Five years after this strategy had been implemented, we evaluated the status and variability of insecticide resistance among Ae. aegypti collected at 26 sites in Tapachula.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We determined the lethal concentrations at 50% of the tested populations (LC50) using a bottle bioassay, and then, we calculated the resistance ratio (RR) relative to the susceptible New Orleans strain. Permethrin and deltamethrin (pyrethroids), chlorpyrifos and malathion (organophosphates), and bendiocarb (carbamate) were tested. The frequencies of the substitutions V1016I and F1534C, which are in the voltage-gated sodium channel and confer knockdown-resistance (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides, were calculated. Despite 5 years having passed since the removal of pyrethroids from the control programs, Ae. aegypti remained highly resistant to permethrin and deltamethrin (RR > 10-fold). In addition, following 5 years of chlorpyrifos use, mosquitoes at 15 of 26 sites showed moderate resistance to chlorpyrifos (5- to 10-fold), and the mosquitoes from one site were highly resistant. All sites had low resistance to malathion (< 5-fold). Resistance to bendiocarb was low at 19 sites, moderate at five, and high at two. Frequencies of the V1016I ranged from 0.16-0.71, while C1534 approached fixation at 23 sites (0.8-1). Resistance profiles and kdr allele frequencies varied across Tapachula. The variability was not associated with a spatial pattern at the scale of the sampling.

CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Mosquito populations respond to selection pressure at a focal scale in the field. Spatial variation across sites highlights the importance of testing multiple sites within geographical regions.

摘要

背景

杀虫剂的使用仍是控制登革热、寨卡病毒、基孔肯雅热和黄热病传播媒介埃及伊蚊的主要策略。在墨西哥塔帕丘拉市,2013 年,蚊虫控制项目将户外空间喷洒的杀虫剂从拟除虫菊酯类更换为有机磷类。此外,喷洒方案从全面覆盖改为重点控制,优先考虑具有更高虫媒病毒风险的区域。在实施该策略五年后,我们评估了在塔帕丘拉的 26 个地点收集的埃及伊蚊的抗药性现状和变化情况。

方法/主要发现:我们使用瓶测法确定了测试种群的半数致死浓度(LC50),然后计算了与敏感的新奥尔良品系的抗性比值(RR)。测试了拟除虫菊酯类的氯菊酯和溴氰菊酯、有机磷类的毒死蜱和马拉硫磷以及氨基甲酸酯类的丁醚脲。计算了电压门控钠离子通道中的 V1016I 和 F1534C 取代的频率,这些取代赋予了对拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂的击倒抗性(kdr)。尽管在控制项目中停止使用拟除虫菊酯已经过去 5 年,但埃及伊蚊对氯菊酯和溴氰菊酯仍保持高度抗性(RR>10 倍)。此外,在使用毒死蜱 5 年后,26 个地点中的 15 个地点的蚊子对毒死蜱表现出中等抗性(5-10 倍),一个地点的蚊子则表现出高度抗性。所有地点对马拉硫磷的抗性均较低(<5 倍)。19 个地点对丁醚脲的抗性较低,5 个地点为中度,2 个为高度。V1016I 的频率范围为 0.16-0.71,而 C1534 在 23 个地点接近固定(0.8-1)。抗药性谱和 kdr 等位基因频率在塔帕丘拉各地有所不同。这种变异性与采样规模的空间模式无关。

结论/意义:蚊子种群在现场的焦点尺度上对选择压力作出反应。各地之间的差异突出了在地理区域内测试多个地点的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ad/8475978/79e2c885bad4/pntd.0009746.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ad/8475978/cdc6462ebb91/pntd.0009746.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ad/8475978/40d07f8d7952/pntd.0009746.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ad/8475978/27cb8ace918d/pntd.0009746.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ad/8475978/79e2c885bad4/pntd.0009746.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ad/8475978/cdc6462ebb91/pntd.0009746.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ad/8475978/40d07f8d7952/pntd.0009746.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ad/8475978/27cb8ace918d/pntd.0009746.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98ad/8475978/79e2c885bad4/pntd.0009746.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Insecticide resistance in Aedes aegypti from Tapachula, Mexico: Spatial variation and response to historical insecticide use.墨西哥塔帕楚拉伊蚊的杀虫剂抗药性:空间变异与对历史杀虫剂使用的反应。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Sep 27;15(9):e0009746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009746. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Levels of insecticide resistance to deltamethrin, malathion, and temephos, and associated mechanisms in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes from the Guadeloupe and Saint Martin islands (French West Indies).法属西印度群岛瓜德罗普岛和圣马丁岛埃及伊蚊对溴氰菊酯、马拉硫磷和双硫磷的抗药性水平及相关机制
Infect Dis Poverty. 2017 Feb 10;6(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0254-x.
3
Co-occurrence of kdr Mutations V1016I and F1534C and Its Association With Phenotypic Resistance to Pyrethroids in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Populations From Costa Rica.哥斯达黎加埃及伊蚊种群中 kdr 突变 V1016I 和 F1534C 的共现及其与拟除虫菊酯表型抗性的关系。
J Med Entomol. 2020 May 4;57(3):830-836. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjz241.
4
Fine-scale monitoring of insecticide resistance in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Sri Lanka and modeling the phenotypic resistance using rational approximation.斯里兰卡埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)的杀虫剂抗性精细监测及利用合理逼近模型对表型抗性进行模拟。
Parasit Vectors. 2024 Jan 12;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-06100-9.
5
Recent rapid rise of a permethrin knock down resistance allele in Aedes aegypti in México.墨西哥埃及伊蚊中氯菊酯击倒抗性等位基因近期迅速增加。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009 Oct 13;3(10):e531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000531.
6
Resistance to commonly used insecticides and underlying mechanisms of resistance in Aedes aegypti (L.) from Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡埃及伊蚊对常用杀虫剂的抗性及抗性机制。
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Aug 10;13(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04284-y.
7
Association of 410L, 1016I and 1534C kdr mutations with pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, and development of a one-step multiplex PCR method for the simultaneous detection of 1534C and 1016I kdr mutations.与布基纳法索瓦加杜古埃及伊蚊对拟除虫菊酯的抗性相关的 410L、1016I 和 1534C kdr 突变,以及一种用于同时检测 1534C 和 1016I kdr 突变的一步多重 PCR 方法的开发。
Parasit Vectors. 2023 Apr 19;16(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05743-y.
8
Temporal frequency of knockdown resistance mutations, F1534C and V1016G, in Aedes aegypti in Chiang Mai city, Thailand and the impact of the mutations on the efficiency of thermal fogging spray with pyrethroids.泰国清迈市埃及伊蚊中击倒抗性突变F1534C和V1016G的时间频率以及这些突变对拟除虫菊酯热雾喷洒效率的影响。
Acta Trop. 2016 Oct;162:125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
9
Molecular evidence of sequential evolution of DDT- and pyrethroid-resistant sodium channel in Aedes aegypti.分子证据表明埃及伊蚊中滴滴涕和拟除虫菊酯抗性钠离子通道的连续进化。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Jun 3;13(6):e0007432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007432. eCollection 2019 Jun.
10
Kdr genotyping (V1016I, F1534C) of the Nav channel of Aedes aegypti (L.) mosquito populations in Harris County (Houston), Texas, USA, after Permanone 31-66 field tests and its influence on probability of survival.美国德克萨斯州哈里斯县(休斯顿)伊蚊种群 Nav 通道 Kdr 基因分型(V1016I、F1534C),经 Permanone 31-66 田间试验及其对存活率影响后。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Nov 4;15(11):e0009833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009833. eCollection 2021 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
Insecticide resistance status and high frequency of kdr mutations in Aedes aegypti in Tegucigalpa, Honduras.洪都拉斯特古西加尔巴埃及伊蚊的抗杀虫剂状况及击倒抗性(kdr)突变的高频率
Parasit Vectors. 2025 Aug 1;18(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s13071-025-06953-2.
2
Deltamethrin Selection Drives Transcriptomic Changes in Detoxification, Immune, and Cuticle Genes in .溴氰菊酯选择驱动了[具体对象]中解毒、免疫和表皮基因的转录组变化。
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 17;10(6):171. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed10060171.
3
Susceptibility and resistance profiles of field and laboratory strains of Everts to pirimiphos-methyl, alpha-cypermethrin and spinetoram.

本文引用的文献

1
[Insecticide resistance in Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) populations from Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico].[墨西哥恰帕斯州塔帕丘拉地区埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)种群中的杀虫剂抗性]
Salud Publica Mex. 2020 Jul-Aug;62(4):439-446. doi: 10.21149/10131.
2
Loss of pyrethroid resistance in newly established laboratory colonies of Aedes aegypti.埃及伊蚊新建立的实验室种群中拟除虫菊酯抗性的丧失。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Mar 16;14(3):e0007753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007753. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
Fine-scale spatial and temporal dynamics of kdr haplotypes in Aedes aegypti from Mexico.
埃弗茨田间和实验室菌株对甲基嘧啶磷、高效氯氰菊酯和多杀霉素的敏感性及抗性谱。
PeerJ. 2025 May 13;13:e19423. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19423. eCollection 2025.
4
The Ecological, Biological, and Social Determinants of Dengue Epidemiology in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Scoping Review of the Literature.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区登革热流行病学的生态、生物和社会决定因素:文献综述
Ecohealth. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s10393-025-01706-0.
5
Three years of insecticide resistance evolution and associated mechanisms in Aedes aegypti populations of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.布基纳法索瓦加杜古埃及伊蚊种群三年来的抗杀虫剂进化及相关机制
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Dec 2;18(12):e0012138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012138. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Effectiveness of mass trapping interventions using autocidal gravid ovitraps (AGO) for the control of the dengue vector, Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti, in Northern Mexico.利用自感式诱卵器(AGO)进行大规模诱捕干预对控制墨西哥北部登革热媒介埃及伊蚊的效果。
Parasit Vectors. 2024 Aug 17;17(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13071-024-06361-y.
7
Knockdown resistance mutations in Phlebotomus argentipes sand flies in Bihar, India.印度比哈尔邦致倦库蚊中的击倒抗性突变。
Parasit Vectors. 2024 Aug 9;17(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s13071-024-06424-0.
8
Extreme resistance to S-methoprene in field-collected Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) across the Chicago, IL region.野外采集的芝加哥地区库蚊(双翅目:蚊科)对 S-甲氧普烯的极端抗性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 3;14(1):18001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69066-3.
9
Uncovering the genetic diversity in Aedes aegypti insecticide resistance genes through global comparative genomics.通过全球比较基因组学揭示埃及伊蚊杀虫剂抗性基因的遗传多样性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 11;14(1):13447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64007-6.
10
Entomological surveys and insecticide susceptibility profile of Aedes aegypti during the dengue outbreak in Sao Tome and Principe in 2022.2022年圣多美和普林西比登革热疫情期间埃及伊蚊的昆虫学调查及杀虫剂敏感性概况
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Jun 3;18(6):e0011903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011903. eCollection 2024 Jun.
墨西哥埃及伊蚊 kdr 单倍型的精细时空动态。
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Jan 9;12(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3275-9.
4
Integrated Aedes management for the control of Aedes-borne diseases.病媒蚊综合管理以控制病媒蚊传播疾病。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Dec 6;12(12):e0006845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006845. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Experimental evaluation of the impact of household aerosolized insecticides on pyrethroid resistant Aedes aegypti.家用气溶胶杀虫剂对拟除虫菊酯抗性埃及伊蚊影响的实验评估。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 22;8(1):12535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30968-8.
6
Pyrethroid resistance in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in Southeast Asia: present situation and prospects for management.东南亚登革热传播媒介埃及伊蚊的拟除虫菊酯抗性:现状和管理展望。
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Jun 4;11(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2899-0.
7
Parallel evolution of vgsc mutations at domains IS6, IIS6 and IIIS6 in pyrethroid resistant Aedes aegypti from Mexico.在来自墨西哥的对拟除虫菊酯具有抗性的埃及伊蚊中,IS6、IIS6 和 IIIS6 结构域的 vgsc 突变呈平行进化。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 30;8(1):6747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25222-0.
8
Insecticide susceptibility status in Mexican populations of Stegomyia aegypti (= Aedes aegypti): a nationwide assessment.墨西哥埃及伊蚊(=白纹伊蚊)种群的杀虫剂敏感性状况:一项全国性评估。
Med Vet Entomol. 2018 Jun;32(2):162-174. doi: 10.1111/mve.12281. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
9
Detection of a new pyrethroid resistance mutation (V410L) in the sodium channel of Aedes aegypti: a potential challenge for mosquito control.检测到埃及伊蚊钠离子通道中的一个新拟除虫菊酯抗性突变(V410L):对蚊虫控制的潜在挑战。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 19;7:46549. doi: 10.1038/srep46549.
10
Does insecticide resistance contribute to heterogeneities in malaria transmission in The Gambia?杀虫剂抗性是否导致了冈比亚疟疾传播的异质性?
Malar J. 2016 Mar 15;15:166. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1203-z.