Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Odontología. Cátedra de OdontologÍa Restauradora, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Odontología, Cátedra de Materiales Dentales, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2021 Aug 1;34(2):143-148. doi: 10.54589/aol.34/2/143.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of radiating energy transmitted through lithium disilicate discs of different thicknesses and opacities with different curing units (CU). Discshaped specimens 8 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm or 0.7 mm thick were designed with Zbrush® and Cura 3D® software, milled from HT and MO IPS e-maxCAD blocks (Ivoclar Vivadent) with Ceramill Mikro 4 (Amann Girrbach, Austria) and processed according to manufacturer instructions. Thickness was checked with a Mitutoyo (México) caliper. Four groups (n=4) were formed: G1(HT/1.5 mm), G2(MO/1.5 mm), G3(HT/0.7 mm) y G4(MO/0.7 mm), and the effect of three CUs: Coltolux (Coltene- Whaledent), LED.C, (Woodpecker Medical Instrument Co.Ltd) and Deepcure L(3M-ESPE) was tested Measurements were taken with a halogen and LED radiometer (Woodpecker® LM-1-Guilin Woodpecker Medical Instrument Co.Ltd) after applying the guide of each CU directly on the reading window (d) and after interposing each of the specimens. The ratio of transmitted energy was determined in each case and data was analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey test for multiple comparisons. LED.C: d:1600 mW/cm2, G1: 0.31(0.00), G2: 0.14(0.00) G3: 0.54(0.01), G4: 0.38(0.01); Deepcure L: d:1500 mW/cm2, G1: 0.34(0.01), G2: 0.20(0,00), G3: 0.56(0.01), G4: 0.41(0.02); Coltolux: d:1275 mW/cm2, G1: 0.44(0.01), G2: 0.24(0,00), G3: 0.65(0.01), G4: 0.47(0,00). Statistically significant differences were found among the curing units (P<0.001) and for the interaction CU-thickness (P<0.001) and CU-opacity (P=0.023). Within the conditions of this study, the ratio of light transmitted through lithium disilicate structures is related to their thickness and opacity, and to the curing unit employed.
本研究旨在评估不同厚度和不透明度的锂硅酸盐片通过不同固化单元(CU)传输的辐射能的量。使用 Zbrush® 和 Cura 3D®软件设计直径为 8 毫米、厚度为 1.5 毫米或 0.7 毫米的圆盘状样本,由 HT 和 MO IPS e-maxCAD 块(Ivoclar Vivadent)用 Ceramill Mikro 4(Amann Girrbach,奥地利)铣床铣削,并根据制造商的说明进行加工。厚度用 Mitutoyo(墨西哥)卡尺检查。形成了四个组(n=4):G1(HT/1.5 毫米)、G2(MO/1.5 毫米)、G3(HT/0.7 毫米)和 G4(MO/0.7 毫米),并测试了三种 CU 的效果:C oltolux(Coltene-Whaledent)、LED.C(Woodpecker Medical Instrument Co.Ltd)和 Deepcure L(3M-ESPE)。在直接将每个 CU 的指南应用于读数窗口(d)并插入每个样本后,使用卤素和 LED 辐射计(Woodpecker®LM-1-Guilin Woodpecker Medical Instrument Co.Ltd)进行测量。在每种情况下确定传输能量的比例,并使用重复测量 ANOVA 和 Tukey 检验进行多组比较进行数据分析。LED.C:d:1600 mW/cm2,G1:0.31(0.00),G2:0.14(0.00)G3:0.54(0.01),G4:0.38(0.01);Deepcure L:d:1500 mW/cm2,G1:0.34(0.01),G2:0.20(0.00),G3:0.56(0.01),G4:0.41(0.02);C oltolux:d:1275 mW/cm2,G1:0.44(0.01),G2:0.24(0.00),G3:0.65(0.01),G4:0.47(0.00)。固化单元之间存在统计学上的显著差异(P<0.001),以及 CU-厚度(P<0.001)和 CU-不透明度(P=0.023)之间的相互作用。在本研究条件下,通过锂硅酸盐结构传输的光的比例与其厚度和不透明度以及所用的固化单元有关。