• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胱抑素 C 与基于肌酐的 eGFR 之间的差异与慢性肾脏病患者的不良心血管结局相关。

The difference between cystatin C- and creatinine-based eGFR is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome in patients with chronic kidney disease.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Yonsei University, Institute of Kidney Disease Research, College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Atherosclerosis. 2021 Oct;335:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.08.036. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.08.036
PMID:34571286
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Decreased kidney function is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, assessing risk of CVD may be difficult when there is a gap between creatinine- and cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We studied the association of the difference in eGFRs with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

This prospective cohort study was conducted in 2076 patients with CKD stages based on the KDIGO guideline (eGFR categories of G1: ≥90; G 2: 60-89; G3: 30-59; G4: 15-29; G5: <15 mL/min/1.73 m without kidney replacement therapy). The difference in eGFR (eGFR) was calculated by subtracting the cystatin C-based eGFR (eGFR) from the creatinine-based eGFR (eGFR). The primary outcome was MACE, defined as non-fatal acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina, stroke, congestive heart failure, symptomatic arrhythmia, and cardiac death.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 4.1 years, MACE occurred in 147 patients (incidence rate, 15.0 per 1000 patient-years). When patients were categorized into baseline eGFR tertiles, the highest tertile was associated with a significantly higher risk of MACE (hazard ratio, 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-3.51) than the lowest tertile when adjusted for eGFR, eGFR, or eGFR based on both creatinine and cystatin C. Patients in the highest tertile had more baseline coronary artery calcification (CAC) than those in the lowest tertile (odds ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.03-1.86). In addition, 978 patients had data for both baseline and follow-up CAC at year 4. In this subgroup, baseline eGFR was significantly associated with accelerated CAC progression (≥50/year) (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A large positive difference between eGFR and eGFR was associated with a higher risk of MACE and faster CAC progression in patients with CKD. Therefore, careful monitoring of CVD is needed for patients with a higher eGFR.

摘要

背景与目的

肾功能下降是心血管疾病(CVD)的一个重要危险因素。然而,当基于肌酐和胱抑素 C 的估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)之间存在差距时,评估 CVD 风险可能较为困难。本研究旨在探讨慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者 eGFR 差值与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)之间的关系。

方法

本前瞻性队列研究纳入了 2076 名根据 KDIGO 指南确定的 CKD 患者(eGFR 分类:G1:≥90;G2:60-89;G3:30-59;G4:15-29;G5:<15 mL/min/1.73 m,无肾脏替代治疗)。eGFR 差值(eGFR)通过减去基于胱抑素 C 的 eGFR(eGFR)计算得出。主要结局为 MACE,定义为非致死性急性心肌梗死和不稳定型心绞痛、卒中等、充血性心力衰竭、有症状心律失常和心脏性死亡。

结果

在中位随访 4.1 年期间,147 名患者发生了 MACE(发生率为 15.0/1000 患者-年)。当患者按基线 eGFR 三分位分组时,与最低三分位相比,最高三分位的 MACE 风险显著更高(风险比,2.12;95%置信区间 [CI],1.28-3.51),且校正 eGFR、eGFR 或基于肌酐和胱抑素 C 的 eGFR 后,结果仍具有统计学意义。最高三分位患者的基线冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分明显高于最低三分位(比值比 [OR],1.38;95% CI,1.03-1.86)。此外,978 名患者在第 4 年时同时具有基线和随访 CAC 数据。在该亚组中,基线 eGFR 与 CAC 进展速度加快(≥50/年)显著相关(OR,1.03;95% CI,1.01-1.05)。

结论

在 CKD 患者中,eGFR 与 eGFR 之间存在较大的正值差值与 MACE 风险增加和 CAC 进展加速相关。因此,对于 eGFR 较高的患者,需要密切监测 CVD。

相似文献

1
The difference between cystatin C- and creatinine-based eGFR is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome in patients with chronic kidney disease.胱抑素 C 与基于肌酐的 eGFR 之间的差异与慢性肾脏病患者的不良心血管结局相关。
Atherosclerosis. 2021 Oct;335:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.08.036. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
2
Association of Intra-individual Differences in Estimated GFR by Creatinine Versus Cystatin C With Incident Heart Failure.肌酐与胱抑素 C 估算的肾小球滤过率个体内差异与心力衰竭事件的关系。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 Dec;80(6):762-772.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.05.011. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
3
The Difference Between Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based Estimated GFR and Associations With Frailty and Adverse Outcomes: A Cohort Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).胱抑素 C-与肌酐估算肾小球滤过率的差异及其与虚弱和不良结局的关系:一项收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的队列分析。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Dec;76(6):765-774. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
Difference Between Estimated GFR Based on Cystatin C Versus Creatinine and Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Cohort Study of the UK Biobank.基于胱抑素 C 与肌酐的估算肾小球滤过率的差异与房颤事件:英国生物库的队列研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Jun;83(6):729-738.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.11.004. Epub 2024 Jan 1.
5
The clinical utility and cost impact of cystatin C measurement in the diagnosis and management of chronic kidney disease: A primary care cohort study.胱抑素C检测在慢性肾脏病诊断和管理中的临床效用及成本影响:一项初级保健队列研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 10;14(10):e1002400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002400. eCollection 2017 Oct.
6
Intraindividual difference in estimated GFR by creatinine and cystatin C, cognitive trajectories and motoric cognitive risk syndrome.肌酐和胱抑素 C 估算肾小球滤过率的个体内差异、认知轨迹和运动认知风险综合征。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024 Apr 26;39(5):860-872. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfad234.
7
Association between chronic kidney disease detected using creatinine and cystatin C and death and cardiovascular events in elderly Mexican Americans: the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging.使用肌酐和胱抑素 C 检测的慢性肾脏病与老年墨西哥裔美国人死亡和心血管事件的关系:萨克拉门托拉丁裔老龄化研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jan;61(1):90-5. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12040. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
8
Possible risk of overestimation of renal function using cystatin C-based eGFR in testicular cancer survivors treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy.在接受基于顺铂化疗的睾丸癌幸存者中,使用基于胱抑素C的估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)可能存在高估肾功能的风险。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018 Jun;22(3):727-734. doi: 10.1007/s10157-017-1474-x. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
9
Difference between kidney function by cystatin C versus creatinine and association with muscle mass and frailty.胱抑素 C 与肌酐评估肾功能的差异及其与肌肉量和虚弱的关系。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3163-3170. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19014. Epub 2024 May 31.
10
Kidney Function as Risk Factor and Predictor of Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality Among Older Adults.老年人肾功能作为心血管结局和死亡率的危险因素和预测因素。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Mar;77(3):386-396.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Difference between estimated glomerular filtration rate based on cystatin c versus creatinine and risk of hypertension: a prospective cohort study.基于胱抑素C与肌酐的估计肾小球滤过率差异与高血压风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Aug 4;30(1):705. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02988-4.
2
The Discrepancy Between Estimated GFR Cystatin C and Estimated GFR Creatinine at 3 Months After Hospitalization and Long-Term Adverse Outcomes.住院3个月时估算的肾小球滤过率(GFR)胱抑素C与估算的GFR肌酐之间的差异及长期不良结局
Kidney Int Rep. 2025 Apr 9;10(6):1896-1906. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2025.04.003. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Association of Differences in Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate With Prevalence and Incidence of Stroke.
基于胱抑素C和肌酐的估计肾小球滤过率差异与中风患病率和发病率的关联
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):e039185. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039185. Epub 2025 May 23.
4
Association between the difference in estimated GFR based on cystatin C versus creatinine in coronary artery diseases.基于胱抑素C与肌酐估算的肾小球滤过率差异在冠状动脉疾病中的关联。
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2482127. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2482127. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
5
Discordance between cystatin C-based and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate and health outcomes in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于胱抑素C和基于肌酐的成人估计肾小球滤过率之间的不一致性及其对健康结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Kidney J. 2025 Jan 8;18(3):sfaf003. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf003. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Difference between estimated glomerular filtration rate based on cystatin C versus creatinine and cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic health.基于胱抑素C与肌酐的估算肾小球滤过率之间的差异以及心血管-肾脏-代谢健康状况。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 15;11:1477343. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1477343. eCollection 2024.
7
Evaluation of Individual Cardiovascular Risk in Pre-Dialysis CKD Patients by Using the Ratio of Calcium-Phosphorus Product to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (Ca × P/eGFR).使用钙磷乘积与估算肾小球滤过率的比值(Ca×P/eGFR)评估透析前慢性肾脏病患者的个体心血管风险。
Biomedicines. 2025 Jan 19;13(1):235. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13010235.
8
A retrospective multi-site examination of chronic kidney disease using longitudinal laboratory results and metadata to identify clinical and financial risk.一项利用纵向实验室结果和元数据对慢性肾病进行的回顾性多中心检查,以识别临床和财务风险。
BMC Nephrol. 2024 Dec 6;25(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03869-4.
9
Inflammation and Nutritional Status Mediated the Increased of Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Associated with eGFRdiff Post-Ablation.炎症和营养状况介导了消融术后与估算肾小球滤过率差异相关的心房颤动复发风险增加。
J Inflamm Res. 2024 Nov 25;17:9743-9756. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S496590. eCollection 2024.
10
A Multi-Channel Urine Sensing Detection System Based on Creatinine, Uric Acid, and pH.基于肌酐、尿酸和 pH 值的多通道尿液传感检测系统。
Biosensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 2;14(10):473. doi: 10.3390/bios14100473.