Suppr超能文献

COVID-19住院患者血流感染的发病率、危险因素及对临床结局的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究

Incidence, Risk Factors and Impact on Clinical Outcomes of Bloodstream Infections in Patients Hospitalised with COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Cona Andrea, Tavelli Alessandro, Renzelli Andrea, Varisco Benedetta, Bai Francesca, Tesoro Daniele, Za Alessandro, Biassoni Caterina, Battaglioli Lodovica, Allegrini Marina, Viganò Ottavia, Gazzola Lidia, Bini Teresa, Marchetti Giulia Carla, d'Arminio Monforte Antonella

机构信息

Clinic of Infectious Diseases, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy.

Central Health Care Management, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Via di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Aug 24;10(9):1031. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091031.

Abstract

With the aim of describing the burden and epidemiology of community-acquired/healthcare-associated and hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (CA/HCA-BSIs and HA-BSIs) in patients hospitalised with COVID-19, and evaluating the risk factors for BSIs and their relative impact on mortality, an observational cohort study was performed on patients hospitalised with COVID-19 at San Paolo Hospital in Milan, Italy from 24 February to 30 November 2020. Among 1351 consecutive patients hospitalised with COVID-19, 18 (1.3%) had CA/HCA-BSI and 51 (3.8%) HA-BSI for a total of 82 episodes of BSI. The overall incidence of HA-BSI was 3.3/1000 patient-days (95% CI 2.4-4.2). Patients with HA-BSI had a longer hospital stay compared to CA/HCA-BSI and no-BSI groups (27 (IQR 21-35) vs. 12 (7-29) vs. 9 (5-17) median-days, < 0.001) but a similar in-hospital mortality (31% vs. 33% vs. 25%, = 0.421). BSI was not associated with an increased risk of mortality (CA/HCA-BSI vs. non-BSI aOR 1.27 95% CI 0.41-3.90, = 0.681; HA-BSI vs. non-BSI aOR 1.29 95% CI 0.65-2.54, = 0.463). Upon multivariate analysis, NIMV/CPAP (aOR 2.09, 95% CI 1.06-4.12, = 0.034), IMV (aOR 5.13, 95% CI 2.08-12.65, < 0.001) and corticosteroid treatment (aOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.06-4.19, = 0.032) were confirmed as independent factors associated with HA-BSI. Development of HA-BSI did not significantly affect mortality. Patients treated with corticosteroid therapy had double the risk of developing BSI.

摘要

为了描述新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)住院患者社区获得性/医疗保健相关及医院获得性血流感染(CA/HCA-BSIs和HA-BSIs)的负担和流行病学情况,并评估血流感染的危险因素及其对死亡率的相对影响,于2020年2月24日至11月30日在意大利米兰圣保罗医院对COVID-19住院患者进行了一项观察性队列研究。在1351例连续的COVID-19住院患者中,18例(1.3%)发生CA/HCA-BSI,51例(3.8%)发生HA-BSI,共计82例血流感染发作。HA-BSI的总体发病率为3.3/1000患者日(95%CI 2.4 - 4.2)。与CA/HCA-BSI组和无血流感染组相比,HA-BSI患者的住院时间更长(中位数天数分别为27(IQR 21 - 35)天、12(7 - 29)天和9(5 - 17)天,<0.001),但院内死亡率相似(分别为31%、33%和25%,=0.421)。血流感染与死亡率增加无关(CA/HCA-BSI组与非血流感染组比较,调整后比值比(aOR)为1.27,95%CI 0.41 - 3.90,=0.681;HA-BSI组与非血流感染组比较,aOR为1.29,95%CI 0.65 - 2.54,=0.463)。多因素分析显示,无创通气/持续气道正压通气(NIMV/CPAP)(aOR 2.09,95%CI 1.06 - 4.12,=0.034)、有创机械通气(IMV)(aOR 5.13,95%CI 2.08 - 12.65,<0.001)和皮质类固醇治疗(aOR 2.11,95%CI 1.06 - 4.19,=0.032)被确认为与HA-BSI相关的独立因素。HA-BSI的发生对死亡率没有显著影响。接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者发生血流感染的风险加倍。

相似文献

3
The distinct category of healthcare associated bloodstream infections.
BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Apr 9;12:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-85.
9
Early deaths in bloodstream infections: a population-based case series.
Infect Dis (Lond). 2016;48(5):379-85. doi: 10.3109/23744235.2015.1131329. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Bacterial co-infection in COVID-19: a call to stay vigilant.
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 19;12:e18041. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18041. eCollection 2024.
2
Impact of intensified prevention measures on the rate of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 14;3(1):e235. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.505. eCollection 2023.
3
Antimicrobial resistance in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lancet Microbe. 2023 Mar;4(3):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00355-X. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
4
Epidemiology of Candidemia and Fluconazole Resistance in an ICU before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic Era.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Jun 4;11(6):771. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11060771.

本文引用的文献

2
Co-Infections in Critically Ill Patients with or without COVID-19: A Comparison of Clinical Microbial Culture Findings.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;18(8):4358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084358.
3
Antimicrobial Resistance Threats in the emerging COVID-19 pandemic: Where do we stand?
J Infect Public Health. 2021 May;14(5):555-560. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
COVID-19 increased the risk of ICU-acquired bloodstream infections: a case-cohort study from the multicentric OUTCOMEREA network.
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Feb;47(2):180-187. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06346-w. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
6
Secondary infections in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: incidence and predictive factors.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar;27(3):451-457. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.021. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
7
ICU-acquired bloodstream infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
J Hosp Infect. 2021 Jan;107:95-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
8
Incidence of bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections in COVID-19 patients in intensive care: An alarming "collateral effect".
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Dec;23:290-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
9
Low incidence of co-infection, but high incidence of ICU-acquired infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
J Infect. 2021 Feb;82(2):e20-e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
10
Predominance of hospital-acquired bloodstream infection in patients with Covid-19 pneumonia.
Infect Dis (Lond). 2020 Nov-Dec;52(12):919-922. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2020.1802062. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验