Suppr超能文献

耳鼻喉科中与大麻相关的副作用:范围综述。

Cannabis related side effects in otolaryngology: a scoping review.

机构信息

Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, 4th Floor, Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Center, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada.

出版信息

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Sep 27;50(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40463-021-00538-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cannabis has been rapidly legalized in North America; however, limited evidence exists around its side effects. Health Canada defines side effect as a harmful and unintended response to a health product. Given drug safety concerns, this study's purpose was to review the unintended side effects of cannabis in otolaryngology.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocol was used to conduct a scoping review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases. (PROSPERO: CRD42020153022). English studies in adults were included from inception to the end of 2019. In-vitro, animal, and studies with n < 5 were excluded. Primary outcome was defined as unintended side effects (defined as any Otolaryngology symptom or diagnosis) following cannabis use. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence and risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in randomized trials (RoB 2) and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools were assessed.. Two authors independently reviewed all studies; the senior author settled any discrepancies.

RESULTS

Five hundred and twenty-one studies were screened; 48 studies were analysed. Subspecialties comprised: Head and Neck (32), Otology (8), Rhinology (5), Airway (5), Laryngology (1). Cannabis use was associated with unintended tinnitus, vertigo, hearing loss, infection, malignancy, sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, thyroid dysfunction, and dyspnea. About half (54.1%) of studies showed increased side effects, or no change in symptoms following cannabis use. Oxford Levels of Evidence was 2-4 with substantial heterogeneity. Risk of bias assessment with RoB2 was low to high and ROBINS-1 was moderate to critical.

CONCLUSION

This was the first comprehensive scoping review of unintended side effects of cannabis in Otolaryngology. The current literature is limited and lacks high-quality research Future randomized studies are needed to focus on therapeutic effects of cannabis in otolaryngology. Substantial work remains to guide clinicians to suggest safe, evidence-based choices for cannabis use.

摘要

背景

大麻在北美迅速合法化;然而,关于其副作用的证据有限。加拿大卫生部将副作用定义为对健康产品的有害和意外反应。鉴于药物安全问题,本研究的目的是审查耳鼻喉科中大麻的意外副作用。

方法

使用首选报告项目为系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的 Scoping 综述 (PRISMA-ScR) 方案对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 CENTRAL 数据库进行了 Scoping 综述。(PROSPERO:CRD42020153022)。从成立到 2019 年底,纳入了成年人的英语研究。排除了体外、动物和 n<5 的研究。主要结果定义为使用大麻后出现的意外副作用(定义为任何耳鼻喉科症状或诊断)。牛津循证医学中心:使用随机试验的偏倚风险 (RoB 2) 和干预的非随机研究的偏倚风险 (ROBINS-I) 工具评估证据水平和偏倚风险。两位作者独立审查了所有研究;资深作者解决了任何差异。

结果

筛选了 521 项研究;分析了 48 项研究。亚专业包括:头颈部 (32)、耳科 (8)、鼻科学 (5)、气道 (5)、喉科学 (1)。大麻使用与意外耳鸣、眩晕、听力损失、感染、恶性肿瘤、鼻窦炎、过敏性鼻炎、甲状腺功能障碍和呼吸困难有关。大约一半 (54.1%) 的研究表明,使用大麻后副作用增加或症状无变化。牛津证据水平为 2-4 级,存在较大异质性。RoB2 风险评估为低至高,ROBINS-1 为中至高。

结论

这是耳鼻喉科大麻意外副作用的首次全面范围综述。目前的文献有限,缺乏高质量的研究。未来需要进行随机研究,重点关注大麻在耳鼻喉科的治疗效果。仍有大量工作需要指导临床医生为大麻的使用提供安全、基于证据的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a759/8474823/e3066abf84b3/40463_2021_538_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验