Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006860.
Understanding barriers to childhood vaccination is crucial to inform effective interventions for maximising uptake. Published systematic reviews include different primary studies, producing varying lists of barriers. To make sense of this diverse body of literature, a comprehensive level of summary and synthesis is necessary. This overview of systematic reviews maps all potential parent-level barriers to childhood vaccination identified in systematic reviews. It synthesises these into a conceptual framework to inform development of a vaccine barriers assessment tool.
We applied Joanna Briggs methodology, searching the Epistemonikos review database and reference lists of included reviews to June 2020. Systematic reviews of qualitative or quantitative data on parent-level barriers to routine vaccination in preschool-aged children were included. Reviews addressing influenza, reporting non-modifiable determinants or reporting barriers not relevant to parents were excluded. Where possible, we extracted review details, barrier descriptions and the number, setting and design of primary studies. Two authors independently screened search results and inductively coded barrier descriptions.
We screened 464 papers, identifying 30 relevant reviews with minimal overlap. Fourteen reviews included qualitative and quantitative primary studies, seven included quantitative and seven included qualitative studies only. Two did not report included study designs. Two-thirds of reviews (n=20; 67%) only included primary studies from high-income countries. We extracted 573 barrier descriptions and inductively coded these into 64 unique barriers in six overarching categories: (1) Access, (2) Clinic or Health System Barriers, (3) Concerns and Beliefs, (4) Health Perceptions and Experiences, (5) Knowledge and Information and (6) Social or Family Influence.
A global overview of systematic reviews of parent-level barriers to childhood vaccine uptake identified 64 barriers to inform development of a new comprehensive survey instrument. This instrument will assess both access and acceptance barriers to more accurately diagnose the reasons for under-vaccination in children in different settings.
了解儿童疫苗接种的障碍对于制定有效的干预措施以最大限度地提高接种率至关重要。已发表的系统评价包括不同的原始研究,从而产生了不同的障碍清单。为了理解这一多样化的文献,需要进行全面的总结和综合。本系统评价综述旨在全面概述系统评价中确定的所有潜在的父母层面的儿童疫苗接种障碍。它将这些障碍综合为一个概念框架,为疫苗接种障碍评估工具的开发提供信息。
我们应用乔安娜·布里格斯(Joanna Briggs)方法,从 Epistemonikos 评价数据库和纳入评价的参考文献中进行检索,检索时间截至 2020 年 6 月。纳入了针对学龄前儿童常规疫苗接种中父母层面障碍的定性或定量数据的系统评价。排除了针对流感、报告不可改变的决定因素或报告与父母无关的障碍的评价。在可能的情况下,我们提取了评价的详细信息、障碍描述以及原始研究的数量、设置和设计。两位作者独立筛选了检索结果,并进行了归纳编码障碍描述。
我们筛选了 464 篇论文,确定了 30 篇相关的评价,且这些评价之间的重叠很少。14 篇评价纳入了定性和定量的原始研究,7 篇评价纳入了定量研究,7 篇评价纳入了定性研究。有 2 篇评价未报告纳入的研究设计。三分之二的评价(n=20;67%)仅纳入了来自高收入国家的原始研究。我们提取了 573 个障碍描述,并归纳为 64 个独特的障碍,分为六个总体类别:(1)获取途径,(2)诊所或卫生系统障碍,(3)担忧和信念,(4)健康感知和经验,(5)知识和信息,(6)社会或家庭影响。
对儿童疫苗接种父母层面障碍的系统评价进行全球概述,确定了 64 个障碍,为开发新的综合调查工具提供了信息。该工具将评估获取途径和接受障碍,以更准确地诊断不同环境下儿童疫苗接种不足的原因。