Department of Surgery, AHN Transplant Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ann Transplant. 2021 Sep 28;26:e931648. doi: 10.12659/AOT.931648.
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing kidney transplantation are often placed on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, and their perioperative management is often challenging. This study aimed to determine the safety of continuing anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy prior to kidney transplantation. The primary outcome was bleeding after transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2017 and July 2019 were included and divided into 3 groups: pretransplant anticoagulation with warfarin (WARF; n=23); pretransplant antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel/aspirin (ASA/CLOP; n=32); and control (CTL; n=197). Patients received kidneys from live or deceased donors. Preoperative INRs and platelet counts were compared to ensure therapeutic anticoagulation in the warfarin group and no significant platelet count variation among groups. The primary outcome was graft exploration for bleeding at 3 and 6 months after transplantation. Secondary outcomes included perioperative transfusion requirements, prolonged length of stay (>7 days), and outcomes at 3 and 6 months after transplantation, including hemodialysis and rejection rates and creatinine levels. RESULTS Pretransplant INR was significantly greater in the warfarin group (CTL 1.1, WARF 2.2, ASA/CLOP 1.2; P<0.01). There were no differences in pretransplant platelet count (CTL 202×10³, WARF 186×10³, ASA/CLOP 194×10³; P=0.31), graft exploration for bleeding at 3 (CTL 3%, WARF 0%, ASA/CLOP 3%; P=0.69) and 6 months after transplantation (CTL 1%, WARF 4%, ASA/CLOP 0%; P=0.12), or perioperative blood transfusion requirements (CTL 4%, WARF 4%, ASA/CLOP 14%; P=0.13). Prolonged length of stay was similar (CTL 24%, WARF 26%, ASA/CLOP 44%; P=0.08). There were no significant differences among groups at 3 months in dialysis (CTL 2%, WARF 0%, ASA/CLOP 0%; P=0.71), creatinine (CTL 1.5 mg/dL, WARF 1.7 mg/dL, ASA/CLOP 1.7; P=0.13), or rejection (CTL 6%, WARF 0%, ASA/CLOP 0%) or at 6 months in dialysis (CTL 3%, WARF 0%, ASA/CLOP 0%; P=0.49), creatinine (CTL 1.5 mg/dL, WARF 1.7 mg/dL, ASA/CLOP 1.5; P=0.49), or rejection (CTL 1%, WARF 0%, ASA/CLOP 3%). CONCLUSIONS Continuing anticoagulation or antiplatelet was safe in not increasing bleeding complications or perioperative transfusion requirements. Outcomes were similar at 3 and 6 months among groups. This strategy avoids exposing patients to risk of thrombosis if treatment is held and simplifies proceeding to transplantation.
接受肾移植的患者通常需要接受抗凝或抗血小板治疗,其围手术期管理往往具有挑战性。本研究旨在确定在肾移植前继续抗凝或抗血小板治疗的安全性。主要结局是移植后的出血。
纳入 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 7 月期间接受肾移植的患者,并分为 3 组:华法林抗凝组(WARF;n=23);氯吡格雷/阿司匹林抗血小板治疗组(ASA/CLOP;n=32);和对照组(CTL;n=197)。患者接受活体或已故供者的肾脏。比较术前 INR 和血小板计数,以确保华法林组的抗凝治疗达到治疗效果,且各组之间血小板计数无明显变化。主要结局是移植后 3 个月和 6 个月时因出血而进行移植肾探查。次要结局包括围手术期输血需求、住院时间延长(>7 天)以及移植后 3 个月和 6 个月的结局,包括血液透析、排斥率和肌酐水平。
华法林组术前 INR 显著更高(CTL 1.1,WARF 2.2,ASA/CLOP 1.2;P<0.01)。术前血小板计数无差异(CTL 202×10³,WARF 186×10³,ASA/CLOP 194×10³;P=0.31),移植后 3 个月(CTL 3%,WARF 0%,ASA/CLOP 3%;P=0.69)和 6 个月(CTL 1%,WARF 4%,ASA/CLOP 0%;P=0.12)因出血而进行移植肾探查,或围手术期输血需求(CTL 4%,WARF 4%,ASA/CLOP 14%;P=0.13)无差异。住院时间延长相似(CTL 24%,WARF 26%,ASA/CLOP 44%;P=0.08)。3 个月时各组间透析(CTL 2%,WARF 0%,ASA/CLOP 0%;P=0.71)、肌酐(CTL 1.5 mg/dL,WARF 1.7 mg/dL,ASA/CLOP 1.7;P=0.13)或排斥(CTL 6%,WARF 0%,ASA/CLOP 0%)无显著差异,6 个月时透析(CTL 3%,WARF 0%,ASA/CLOP 0%;P=0.49)、肌酐(CTL 1.5 mg/dL,WARF 1.7 mg/dL,ASA/CLOP 1.5;P=0.49)或排斥(CTL 1%,WARF 0%,ASA/CLOP 3%)也无显著差异。
继续抗凝或抗血小板治疗不会增加出血并发症或围手术期输血需求,且各组在 3 个月和 6 个月时的结局相似。这种策略避免了因停止治疗而使患者面临血栓形成的风险,并简化了进行移植的过程。