Suppr超能文献

基于力板和加速度计的平衡测试在因前庭功能障碍导致平衡问题的患者中的比较。

A comparison of head movements tests in force plate and accelerometer based posturography in patients with balance problems due to vestibular dysfunction.

机构信息

Audiology and Phoniatrics Clinic, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 8 St Therese Str., 91-348, Lodz, Poland.

Balance Disorders Unit, Department of Otolaryngology, The Norbert Barlicki Memorial Teaching Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 27;11(1):19094. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98695-1.

Abstract

This study compares HS posturography on inertial sensors (MediPost) with force platform posturography in patients with unilateral vestibular dysfunction. The study group included 38 patients (age 50.6; SD 11.6) with unilateral vestibular weakness (UV) and 65 healthy volunteers (48.7; SD 11.5). HS tests were performed simultaneously on the force plate and with MediPost sensor attached at L4. Four conditions applied: eyes open/closed, firm/foam. The tests were performed twice, with the head moving at the frequency of 0.3 Hz (HS 0.3) and 0.6 Hz (HS 0.6). Mean sway velocity was significantly lower for MediPost than force plate in 4th condition both in UV and healthy group. For HS 0.3 the differences between devices were marginal; the highest sensitivity (87%) and specificity (95%) were in 4th condition. For HS 0.6 MediPost revealed lower sensitivity than force plate although the surface parameter improved results. MediPost IMU device and force platform posturography revealed a similar ability to differentiate between patients with balance problems in course of vestibular pathology and healthy participants, despite the differences observed between measuring methods. In some tests surface parameter may be more appropriate than sway velocity in improving MediPost sensitivity.

摘要

本研究比较了惯性传感器(MediPost)上的 HS 动态姿势描记术与单侧前庭功能障碍患者的测力台动态姿势描记术。研究组包括 38 名单侧前庭功能减弱(UV)患者(年龄 50.6;SD 11.6)和 65 名健康志愿者(48.7;SD 11.5)。HS 测试同时在测力板和 MediPost 传感器(贴在 L4 上)上进行。应用了四种条件:睁眼/闭眼,硬/泡沫。测试进行了两次,头部以 0.3 Hz(HS 0.3)和 0.6 Hz(HS 0.6)的频率移动。在第 4 种情况下,MediPost 的平均摆动速度明显低于测力板,无论是在 UV 组还是在健康组中。对于 HS 0.3,两种设备之间的差异较小;在第 4 种情况下,敏感性(87%)和特异性(95%)最高。对于 HS 0.6,尽管表面参数提高了结果,但 MediPost 的敏感性低于测力板。尽管观察到测量方法之间存在差异,但 MediPost IMU 设备和测力台动态姿势描记术具有相似的能力来区分前庭病理学过程中的平衡问题患者和健康参与者。在某些测试中,与摆动速度相比,表面参数可能更适合提高 MediPost 的敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5df8/8476591/5ba5556eda81/41598_2021_98695_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验