• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经 CT 分析:TAVR 中双重过滤脑保护装置应用失败的解剖学原因。

Anatomical reasons for failure of dual-filter cerebral embolic protection application in TAVR: A CT-based analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Insure (Institute of Translational Cardiac Surgery), German Heart Centre Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Card Surg. 2021 Dec;36(12):4537-4545. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16025. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1111/jocs.16025
PMID:34580919
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The dual-filter Sentinel™ Cerebral Protection System (Sentinel-CPS) is increasingly used during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, complex vascular anatomy may challenge Sentinel-CPS deployment.

AIM OF THE STUDY

We sought to investigate the impact of anatomic features of the aortic arch and the supra-aortic arteries on technical device failure of Sentinel-CPS application.

METHODS

Analysis of the multislice computed tomography pre-TAVR aortograms of all patients undergoing TAVR with Sentinel-CPS between 2016 and 2020 (n = 92) was performed. We investigated the impact of aortic arch anatomy, configuration, and the angles of the supra-aortic arteries, including the determination of vascular tortuosity index on device failure of Sentinel-CPS application.

RESULTS

The Sentinel-CPS was applied successfully in 83 patients (90.2%). Device failure in nine patients (9.8%) was due to the infeasibility to perform correct deployment of both filters (n = 7) and to obtain peripheral radial access (n = 2). Patients with a failure of Sentinel-CPS application had a higher right subclavian tortuosity index (217 [92-324] vs. 150 [42-252], p = .046), a higher brachiocephalic tortuosity index (27 [5-51] vs. 10 [0-102], p = 0.033) and a larger angulation of the brachiocephalic artery (59° [22-80] vs. 39° [7-104], p = .014) compared with patients with successful application. A brachiocephalic angle more than 59° was predictive for device failure. No differences in aortic arch anatomy or common carotid artery tortuosity were detected between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachiocephalic tortuosity was found to be associated with failure of Sentinel-CPS application. Filter-based usage should be avoided in TAVR patients with a brachiocephalic angle more than 59°.

摘要

背景

在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中,越来越多地使用双滤网 Sentinel™ 脑保护系统(Sentinel-CPS)。然而,复杂的血管解剖结构可能会对 Sentinel-CPS 的部署造成挑战。

目的

我们旨在研究主动脉弓和主动脉上动脉的解剖特征对 Sentinel-CPS 应用技术设备故障的影响。

方法

对 2016 年至 2020 年间接受 TAVR 并使用 Sentinel-CPS 的所有患者(n=92)的多排螺旋 CT 术前主动脉造影进行分析。我们研究了主动脉弓解剖结构、形态以及主动脉上动脉的角度,包括血管迂曲指数对 Sentinel-CPS 应用设备故障的影响。

结果

83 例患者(90.2%)成功应用 Sentinel-CPS。9 例患者(9.8%)设备应用失败,原因是无法正确放置两个滤网(n=7)和获得外周径向入路(n=2)。Sentinel-CPS 应用失败的患者右锁骨下动脉迂曲指数较高(217[92-324]比 150[42-252],p=0.046),头臂动脉迂曲指数较高(27[5-51]比 10[0-102],p=0.033),头臂动脉夹角较大(59°[22-80]比 39°[7-104],p=0.014)。与成功应用患者相比,头臂动脉夹角大于 59°的患者更易发生设备故障。两组间主动脉弓解剖结构或颈总动脉迂曲程度无差异。

结论

头臂动脉迂曲与 Sentinel-CPS 应用失败相关。头臂动脉夹角大于 59°的 TAVR 患者应避免使用滤网。

相似文献

1
Anatomical reasons for failure of dual-filter cerebral embolic protection application in TAVR: A CT-based analysis.经 CT 分析:TAVR 中双重过滤脑保护装置应用失败的解剖学原因。
J Card Surg. 2021 Dec;36(12):4537-4545. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16025. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
2
Patient eligibility for application of a two-filter cerebral embolic protection device during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: does one size fit all?经导管主动脉瓣植入术中应用双滤器脑栓塞保护装置的患者入选标准:一种规格适合所有人吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Apr 1;30(4):605-612. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz306.
3
Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Insights from a consecutive series with the Sentinel cerebral protection device.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的脑栓塞保护:连续系列采用 Sentinel 脑保护装置的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Aug;102(2):339-347. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30697. Epub 2023 May 26.
4
Effects of a dual-filter-based cerebral embolic protection device in transcatheter aortic valve replacement on cerebral oxygen saturation: A prospective pilot study.基于双重过滤的脑保护装置在经导管主动脉瓣置换术中对脑氧饱和度的影响:一项前瞻性的初步研究。
J Card Surg. 2021 Apr;36(4):1241-1248. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15355. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
5
Complete filter-based cerebral embolic protection with transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中基于滤器的全脑栓塞保护
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):790-797. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27323. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
6
Clinical Outcomes of Sentinel Cerebral Protection System Use During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中使用前哨式脑保护系统的临床结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Jun;21(6):717-722. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.04.023. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
7
Transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement with cerebral embolic protection.经颈动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术伴脑保护装置。
J Card Surg. 2022 Jun;37(6):1779-1782. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16417. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
8
Impact of routine use of a cerebral protection device on the TAVR procedure and its short-term outcomes: a single-centre experience.常规使用脑保护装置对经导管主动脉瓣置换术及其短期预后的影响:单中心经验
Acta Cardiol. 2022 Dec;77(10):922-929. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2022.2111128. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
9
Impact of a Two-Filter Cerebral Embolic Protection Device on the Complexity and Risk of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.双滤器脑栓塞保护装置对经导管主动脉瓣置换术复杂性和风险的影响
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68(7):616-622. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688483. Epub 2019 May 15.
10
Significant Differences in Debris Captured by the Sentinel Dual-Filter Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Among Different Valve Types.不同类型经导管主动脉瓣置换术中 Sentinel 双滤网脑保护装置捕获的碎屑存在显著差异。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 10;11(17):1683-1693. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Aortic Arch Morphology on Periprocedural Stroke in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉弓形态对经导管主动脉瓣置换术中围手术期卒中的影响
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 7;14(4):1045. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041045.
2
Association of Bovine Arch Anatomy With Incident Stroke After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后牛主动脉弓解剖结构与新发卒中的关联
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 20;13(4):e032963. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032963. Epub 2024 Feb 13.