• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规使用脑保护装置对经导管主动脉瓣置换术及其短期预后的影响:单中心经验

Impact of routine use of a cerebral protection device on the TAVR procedure and its short-term outcomes: a single-centre experience.

作者信息

von Kemp Marnix J, Floré Vincent, Lau Chirik Wah, De Sutter Johan, Provenier Frank, Cornelis Kristoff

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Hartcentrum, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium.

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Departement Cardiologie, Brussel, Belgium.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol. 2022 Dec;77(10):922-929. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2022.2111128. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1080/00015385.2022.2111128
PMID:36044035
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a major concern in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The introduction of a cerebral protection devices may counteract the evolution towards minimally invasive TAVR. At this time, there is insufficient data to support the routine use of these devices.

METHODS

We aimed to evaluate the outcome of the routine use of the Sentinel Cerebral protection system (CPS) in patients undergoing TAVR, after completing a CT-based screening process for feasibility of Sentinel implantation. We report our initial experience with the routine implementation of the Sentinel CPS in all anatomically suitable patients undergoing TAVR. We retrospectively compared the procedural characteristics and outcomes between all TAVR patients treated with ( = 78) and without ( = 79) intended Sentinel.

RESULTS

The Sentinel CPS could successfully be deployed in 99% of intended cases after CT feasibility screening. TAVR procedures with Sentinel CPS were not longer than procedures without Sentinel use (89 ± 20 versus 120 ± 50 min,  = 0.007). Sentinel CPS use was not associated with an increased risk of procedural complications. Stroke was observed in none (0%) of the Sentinel CPS patients, and in 6.3% of the non-Sentinel CPS patients ( = 0.05). The finding of stroke was associated with a high risk of early postprocedural mortality: 60% of stroke patients died within 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Routine use of the Sentinel CPS in CT-screened TAVR patients is feasible with high procedural success, without significant adverse events and without counteracting the evolution towards minimally invasive TAVR. Clinically relevant stroke was observed in none of the Sentinel CPS patients.

摘要

背景

中风是经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中的一个主要问题。脑保护装置的引入可能会阻碍向微创TAVR的发展。目前,尚无足够数据支持常规使用这些装置。

方法

在完成基于CT的Sentinel植入可行性筛查后,我们旨在评估在接受TAVR的患者中常规使用Sentinel脑保护系统(CPS)的结果。我们报告了在所有解剖结构合适的接受TAVR的患者中常规实施Sentinel CPS的初步经验。我们回顾性比较了所有接受(n = 78)和未接受(n = 79)意向性Sentinel治疗的TAVR患者的手术特征和结果。

结果

经过CT可行性筛查后,99%的意向性病例中Sentinel CPS能够成功部署。使用Sentinel CPS的TAVR手术时间并不长于未使用Sentinel的手术(89 ± 20分钟对120 ± 50分钟,P = 0.007)。使用Sentinel CPS与手术并发症风险增加无关。Sentinel CPS组患者无一例(0%)发生中风,非Sentinel CPS组患者中风发生率为6.3%(P = 0.05)。中风的发生与术后早期高死亡率相关:60%的中风患者在3个月内死亡。

结论

在经CT筛查的TAVR患者中常规使用Sentinel CPS是可行的,手术成功率高,无明显不良事件,且不会阻碍向微创TAVR的发展。Sentinel CPS组患者无一例发生具有临床意义的中风。

相似文献

1
Impact of routine use of a cerebral protection device on the TAVR procedure and its short-term outcomes: a single-centre experience.常规使用脑保护装置对经导管主动脉瓣置换术及其短期预后的影响:单中心经验
Acta Cardiol. 2022 Dec;77(10):922-929. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2022.2111128. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
2
Clinical Outcomes of Sentinel Cerebral Protection System Use During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中使用前哨式脑保护系统的临床结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Jun;21(6):717-722. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.04.023. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
3
Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Significantly Reduces Death and Stroke Compared With Unprotected Procedures.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中脑保护显著降低死亡率和卒率,优于无保护手术。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 27;10(22):2297-2303. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.037. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
4
Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Insights from a consecutive series with the Sentinel cerebral protection device.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的脑栓塞保护:连续系列采用 Sentinel 脑保护装置的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Aug;102(2):339-347. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30697. Epub 2023 May 26.
5
Cerebral embolic protection device utilization and outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A nationally representative propensity matched analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中脑栓塞保护装置的应用及结局:一项全国代表性倾向评分匹配分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Oct;67:112-114. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
6
Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score matched and randomized controlled trials using the Sentinel cerebral embolic protection device.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的脑栓塞保护:使用 Sentinel 脑栓塞保护装置的倾向评分匹配和随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jun 17;23(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03338-0.
7
Transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement with cerebral embolic protection.经颈动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术伴脑保护装置。
J Card Surg. 2022 Jun;37(6):1779-1782. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16417. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
8
Rate of peri-procedural stroke observed with cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a patient-level propensity-matched analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中使用脑保护装置时观察到的围手术期卒中发生率:一项基于患者倾向评分匹配的分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 May 1;40(17):1334-1340. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy847.
9
Anatomical reasons for failure of dual-filter cerebral embolic protection application in TAVR: A CT-based analysis.经 CT 分析:TAVR 中双重过滤脑保护装置应用失败的解剖学原因。
J Card Surg. 2021 Dec;36(12):4537-4545. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16025. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
10
Cerebral embolic protection and severity of stroke following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后脑栓塞保护与卒中严重程度。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100(5):810-820. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30340. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of cerebral embolic protection devices for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An updated meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者使用脑栓塞保护装置的安全性和有效性:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 1;6(7):e1391. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1391. eCollection 2023 Jul.