Bègue Laurent, Vezirian Kevin
Université Grenoble Alpes, Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Oct;48(10):1483-1498. doi: 10.1177/01461672211039413. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
The present research investigated how scientific authority increases the lethal use of animals in biomedical experimentation. In two behavioral studies ( = 151 and 150), participants were required to incrementally administer 12 doses of a toxic chemical to a 53-cm fish (in reality, a biomimetic robot) for research on animal learning. Consistent with the Engaged Followership Theory on obedience, participants placed in a pro-scientific mindset more severely harmed the laboratory animal. In a cross-sectional study ( = 351), participants in medical fields endorsed a more pro-scientific attitude than those in paramedical fields, which mediated their support for animal experimentation. Drawing on a representative European sample ( = 31,238), we also confirmed the specificity of this link by controlling for potential demographic and ideological confounds. In a final study ( = 1,598), instrumental harm was shown as mediating the link between a pro-scientific attitude and support for animal experimentation.
本研究调查了科学权威如何在生物医学实验中增加动物的致死性使用。在两项行为研究(分别为151人和150人)中,参与者被要求逐步给一条53厘米长的鱼(实际上是一个仿生机器人)注射12剂有毒化学物质,用于动物学习研究。与关于服从的参与式追随者理论一致,处于支持科学心态的参与者对实验动物造成的伤害更大。在一项横断面研究(351人)中,医学领域的参与者比辅助医疗领域的参与者更支持科学态度,这介导了他们对动物实验的支持。利用一个具有代表性的欧洲样本(31238人),我们还通过控制潜在的人口统计学和意识形态混杂因素,证实了这种联系的特异性。在最后一项研究(1598人)中,工具性伤害被证明是支持科学态度与支持动物实验之间联系的中介。