• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以科学权威之名宰杀动物:支持科学的思维模式与生物医学实验中动物的致死性使用之间的关系。

Sacrificing Animals in the Name of Scientific Authority: The Relationship Between Pro-Scientific Mindset and the Lethal Use of Animals in Biomedical Experimentation.

作者信息

Bègue Laurent, Vezirian Kevin

机构信息

Université Grenoble Alpes, Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Oct;48(10):1483-1498. doi: 10.1177/01461672211039413. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1177/01461672211039413
PMID:34583579
Abstract

The present research investigated how scientific authority increases the lethal use of animals in biomedical experimentation. In two behavioral studies ( = 151 and 150), participants were required to incrementally administer 12 doses of a toxic chemical to a 53-cm fish (in reality, a biomimetic robot) for research on animal learning. Consistent with the Engaged Followership Theory on obedience, participants placed in a pro-scientific mindset more severely harmed the laboratory animal. In a cross-sectional study ( = 351), participants in medical fields endorsed a more pro-scientific attitude than those in paramedical fields, which mediated their support for animal experimentation. Drawing on a representative European sample ( = 31,238), we also confirmed the specificity of this link by controlling for potential demographic and ideological confounds. In a final study ( = 1,598), instrumental harm was shown as mediating the link between a pro-scientific attitude and support for animal experimentation.

摘要

本研究调查了科学权威如何在生物医学实验中增加动物的致死性使用。在两项行为研究(分别为151人和150人)中,参与者被要求逐步给一条53厘米长的鱼(实际上是一个仿生机器人)注射12剂有毒化学物质,用于动物学习研究。与关于服从的参与式追随者理论一致,处于支持科学心态的参与者对实验动物造成的伤害更大。在一项横断面研究(351人)中,医学领域的参与者比辅助医疗领域的参与者更支持科学态度,这介导了他们对动物实验的支持。利用一个具有代表性的欧洲样本(31238人),我们还通过控制潜在的人口统计学和意识形态混杂因素,证实了这种联系的特异性。在最后一项研究(1598人)中,工具性伤害被证明是支持科学态度与支持动物实验之间联系的中介。

相似文献

1
Sacrificing Animals in the Name of Scientific Authority: The Relationship Between Pro-Scientific Mindset and the Lethal Use of Animals in Biomedical Experimentation.以科学权威之名宰杀动物:支持科学的思维模式与生物医学实验中动物的致死性使用之间的关系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Oct;48(10):1483-1498. doi: 10.1177/01461672211039413. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
2
Engaged followership and toxic science: Exploring the effect of prototypicality on willingness to follow harmful experimental instructions.参与式追随与有毒科学:探索典型性对遵循有害实验指令的意愿的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Apr;62(2):866-882. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12603. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
3
Multiple compliant processes: A reply to Haslam and Reicher on the engaged followership explanation of 'obedience' in Milgram's experiments.多重顺应过程:对哈斯拉姆和赖克就米尔格拉姆实验中“服从”的参与式追随者解释的回应
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;57(2):301-309. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12252. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
4
Authority, conformity and obedience: Applying Friedrich's theory of authority to the classics.权威、从众与服从:将弗雷德里希的权威理论应用于经典。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Oct;61(4):1086-1100. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12527. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
5
A truth that does not always speak its name: How Hollander and Turowetz's findings confirm and extend the engaged followership analysis of harm-doing in the Milgram paradigm.一个并不总是直言其名的真相:霍兰德和图罗韦茨的研究结果如何证实并拓展了米尔格拉姆范式中关于伤害行为的参与式追随者分析。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;57(2):292-300. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12247. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
Working Toward the Experimenter: Reconceptualizing Obedience Within the Milgram Paradigm as Identification-Based Followership.向实验者靠拢:在米尔格拉姆范式中重新概念化服从为基于认同的追随。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul;7(4):315-24. doi: 10.1177/1745691612448482.
7
The (doubtful) role of financial reward in obedience to authority.权威服从中经济报酬的(可疑)作用。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(4):490-496. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1505708. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
8
'Happy to have been of service': the Yale archive as a window into the engaged followership of participants in Milgram's 'obedience' experiments.“很高兴能有所帮助”:耶鲁大学档案馆作为一扇窥探米尔格拉姆“服从”实验参与者积极追随者身份的窗口。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2015 Mar;54(1):55-83. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12074. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
9
Followership Development in Adults.成人领导力发展。
New Dir Stud Leadersh. 2020 Sep;2020(167):37-45. doi: 10.1002/yd.20397.
10
Conflict experience and resolution underlying obedience to authority.服从权威背后的冲突经历和解决方法。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 10;13(1):11161. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38067-z.

引用本文的文献

1
A cross-cultural EEG study of how obedience and conformity influence reconciliation intentions.一项关于服从和从众如何影响和解意愿的跨文化脑电图研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 May 22;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf038.
2
Intentional Harm to Animals: A Multidimensional Approach.对动物的故意伤害:一种多维度方法。
Aggress Behav. 2025 May;51(3):e70028. doi: 10.1002/ab.70028.
3
To Protect or to Kill? Environmental Contingent Self-Worth Moderates Death Prime Effects on Animal-Based Attitudes.保护还是杀戮?环境相关的自我价值感会调节死亡凸显效应对动物相关态度的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Sep;50(9):1315-1331. doi: 10.1177/01461672231160652. Epub 2023 Mar 21.