• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制度质量、金融发展与环境因素对碳排放的影响:全球视角的证据。

Institutional quality, financial development and the influence of environmental factors on carbon emissions: evidence from a global perspective.

机构信息

China Center for Special Economic Zone Research, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

Business School of Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(9):13356-13368. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16626-z. Epub 2021 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-16626-z
PMID:34585358
Abstract

This study explores the moderating role of institutional quality on carbon emissions using data from a global panel regarding renewable energy consumption, foreign direct investment, economic growth and financial development between 2002 and 2019. Using the two-step system generalized method of moments, the results illustrate that in the panel data, renewable energy usage and foreign direct investment inflow enhance environmental quality, while financial development and economic growth lower it. The results show that many countries' quality institutions cannot yet adequately mitigate the harmful impact of each environmental factor and protect the environment; however, the institutional quality interaction term confirms the significant moderating effect of all explanatory variables on environmental quality in the panel data. The findings also confirm the existence of the environmental Kuznets curve and demonstrate the pollution halo hypothesis. The findings in this paper may be useful for policymakers when enacting stricter environmental regulations.

摘要

本研究利用 2002 年至 2019 年全球可再生能源消费、外国直接投资、经济增长和金融发展面板数据,探讨了制度质量对碳排放的调节作用。采用两步系统广义矩方法,结果表明,在面板数据中,可再生能源使用和外国直接投资流入量提高了环境质量,而金融发展和经济增长则降低了环境质量。结果表明,许多国家的优质制度尚不能充分减轻每种环境因素的有害影响并保护环境;然而,制度质量交互项证实了所有解释变量在面板数据中对环境质量的显著调节作用。研究结果还证实了环境库兹涅茨曲线的存在,并证明了污染光环假说。本文的研究结果可能有助于政策制定者在制定更严格的环境法规时参考。

相似文献

1
Institutional quality, financial development and the influence of environmental factors on carbon emissions: evidence from a global perspective.制度质量、金融发展与环境因素对碳排放的影响:全球视角的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(9):13356-13368. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16626-z. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
2
Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries.外国直接投资和可再生能源消费会影响二氧化碳排放吗?来自京都议定书附件国家的面板自回归分布滞后模型方法的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Nov;23(21):21669-21681. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7413-7. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
3
A dynamic analysis of the impact of FDI, on economic growth and carbon emission, evidence from China, India and Singapore.外商直接投资对经济增长和碳排放影响的动态分析——来自中国、印度和新加坡的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(54):82256-82270. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21546-7. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
4
Revisiting the effects of energy, population, foreign direct investment, and economic growth in Visegrad countries under the EKC scheme.重新审视在 EKC 框架下维谢格拉德国家的能源、人口、外国直接投资和经济增长的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):15102-15114. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23188-1. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
5
The role of innovations and renewable energy consumption in reducing environmental degradation in OECD countries: an investigation for Innovation Claudia Curve.经合组织国家创新和可再生能源消费在减少环境退化方面的作用:创新克劳迪娅曲线的调查。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(29):43800-43813. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18912-w. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
6
The role of institutional quality in FDI inflows and carbon emission reduction: evidence from the global developing and belt road initiative countries.制度质量在外国直接投资流入和碳减排中的作用:来自全球发展中及“一带一路”倡议国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(20):30594-30621. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17958-6. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
7
Effect of institutional quality and renewable energy consumption on CO emissions-an empirical investigation for developing countries.制度质量和可再生能源消费对 CO 排放的影响——发展中国家的实证研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(12):15485-15503. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11532-2. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
8
Interrelationships among foreign direct investments, renewable energy, and CO emissions for different European country groups: a panel ARDL approach.不同欧洲国家群体的外国直接投资、可再生能源和二氧化碳排放之间的相互关系:面板 ARDL 方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jul;26(21):21495-21510. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05415-4. Epub 2019 May 24.
9
Impact of economic policy uncertainty, energy intensity, technological innovation and R&D on CO emissions: evidence from a panel of 18 developed economies.经济政策不确定性、能源强度、技术创新和研发对 CO 排放的影响:来自 18 个发达经济体面板的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(58):87426-87445. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21729-2. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
10
The impact of globalization and financial development on environmental quality: evidence from selected countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).全球化和金融发展对环境质量的影响:来自经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)选定国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(13):13246-13262. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04761-7. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Renewable energy and ecological footprint nexus: Evidence from dynamic panel threshold technique.可再生能源与生态足迹的关系:来自动态面板阈值技术的证据
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 22;10(13):e33442. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33442. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
2
The impact of green FDI on environmental quality in less developed countries: A case study of load capacity factor based on PCSE and FGLS techniques.绿色外国直接投资对欠发达国家环境质量的影响:基于PCSE和FGLS技术的负荷能力因素案例研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 21;10(7):e28217. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28217. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
3
From COVID to conflict: Understanding the deriving forces of environment and implications for natural resources.
从新冠疫情到冲突:理解环境的驱动力量及其对自然资源的影响。
Resour Policy. 2023 Jun;83:103700. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103700. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
Impact of Public Environmental Concerns on the Digital Transformation of Heavily Polluting Enterprises.公众环境关切对重污染企业数字化转型的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):203. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010203.
5
The policy effect of green finance reform and innovations: Empirical evidence at the firm level.绿色金融改革与创新的政策效应:来自企业层面的经验证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278128. eCollection 2022.
6
Capital Formation, Green Innovation, Renewable Energy Consumption and Environmental Quality: Do Environmental Regulations Matter?资本形成、绿色创新、可再生能源消费与环境质量:环境规制有作用吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013562.
7
Do renewable energy consumption and green innovation help to curb CO emissions? Evidence from E7 countries.可再生能源消费和绿色创新有助于抑制 CO 排放吗?来自 E7 国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(8):21115-21131. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23723-0. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
8
Exploring the moderating effect of globalization, financial development and environmental degradation nexus: a roadmap to sustainable development.探索全球化、金融发展与环境退化关系的调节效应:可持续发展路线图。
Environ Dev Sustain. 2022 Sep 21:1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02676-x.
9
Revisiting the environmental impact of financial development on economic growth and carbon emissions: evidence from South Asian economies.重新审视金融发展对经济增长和碳排放的环境影响:来自南亚经济体的证据。
Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2022;24(9):2957-2965. doi: 10.1007/s10098-022-02360-8. Epub 2022 Jul 18.