• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视金融发展对经济增长和碳排放的环境影响:来自南亚经济体的证据。

Revisiting the environmental impact of financial development on economic growth and carbon emissions: evidence from South Asian economies.

作者信息

Rani Tayyaba, Amjad Muhammad Asif, Asghar Nabila, Rehman Hafeez Ur

机构信息

School of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi China.

Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.

出版信息

Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2022;24(9):2957-2965. doi: 10.1007/s10098-022-02360-8. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1007/s10098-022-02360-8
PMID:35874941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9294785/
Abstract

It is a global challenge to achieve sustainable economic growth by improving the environment. The present study discussed the role of the financial development sector in achieving sustainable economic growth and environmental quality in South Asian countries from 1990 to 2020 by controlling labour force participation, globalization, industrialization, and the education sector. A feasible generalized least squares (FGLS) panel data econometric technique has been used to check the relationship among the variables. The results show that financial development has a U-shaped relationship with carbon emissions and economic growth. Furthermore, labour force participation, industrialization, globalization, and educational school enrolment significantly increase CO and economic growth. This study suggests that the governments of South Asian countries should take steps to increase economic growth. For this purpose, effective supervisory mechanisms of financial development through financial innovation, improving financial efficiency, maintaining financial stability, and reducing the environmental pollution.

摘要

通过改善环境来实现可持续经济增长是一项全球性挑战。本研究通过控制劳动力参与率、全球化、工业化和教育部门,探讨了1990年至2020年期间金融发展部门在南亚国家实现可持续经济增长和环境质量方面的作用。采用可行广义最小二乘法(FGLS)面板数据计量技术来检验变量之间的关系。结果表明,金融发展与碳排放和经济增长呈U型关系。此外,劳动力参与率、工业化、全球化和教育入学率显著增加了碳排放和经济增长。本研究建议南亚国家政府应采取措施促进经济增长。为此,通过金融创新建立有效的金融发展监管机制,提高金融效率,维持金融稳定,并减少环境污染。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea73/9294785/2ff5c9221d39/10098_2022_2360_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea73/9294785/39c73b201be8/10098_2022_2360_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea73/9294785/03035011af37/10098_2022_2360_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea73/9294785/848813f2bcbc/10098_2022_2360_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea73/9294785/2ff5c9221d39/10098_2022_2360_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea73/9294785/39c73b201be8/10098_2022_2360_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea73/9294785/03035011af37/10098_2022_2360_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea73/9294785/848813f2bcbc/10098_2022_2360_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea73/9294785/2ff5c9221d39/10098_2022_2360_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Revisiting the environmental impact of financial development on economic growth and carbon emissions: evidence from South Asian economies.重新审视金融发展对经济增长和碳排放的环境影响:来自南亚经济体的证据。
Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2022;24(9):2957-2965. doi: 10.1007/s10098-022-02360-8. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
2
The impact of financial development and globalization on environmental quality: evidence from South Asian economies.金融发展和全球化对环境质量的影响:来自南亚经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(7):8088-8101. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11198-w. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
Globalization and CO emissions nexus: evidence from the EKC hypothesis in South Asian countries.全球化与二氧化碳排放关系:来自南亚国家 EKC 假说的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(29):37044-37056. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09774-1. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
4
The impact of globalization and financial development on environmental quality: evidence from selected countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).全球化和金融发展对环境质量的影响:来自经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)选定国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(13):13246-13262. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04761-7. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
5
Economic and non-economic drivers of tourism: bidirectional causality of tourism and environment for South Asian economies.旅游的经济和非经济驱动因素:南亚经济体旅游与环境的双向因果关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(38):89740-89755. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28722-3. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
6
Does sustainable environmental agenda matter in the era of globalization? The relationship among financial development, energy consumption, and sustainable environmental-economic growth.在全球化时代,可持续环境议程重要吗?金融发展、能源消耗与可持续环境经济增长之间的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(21):30808-30818. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18772-4. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
7
On the nexus between industrialization and carbon emissions: evidence from ASEAN + 3 economies.工业化与碳排放的关系:来自东盟+3 经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(21):31476-31485. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18560-0. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
8
Does globalization and financial sector development affect environmental quality? A panel data investigation for the Middle East and North African countries.全球化和金融部门发展是否会影响环境质量?对中东和北非国家的面板数据调查。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(36):45405-45418. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10445-4. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
Does information and communication technologies improve environmental quality in the era of globalization? An empirical analysis.在全球化时代,信息和通信技术是否能改善环境质量?一项实证分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Mar;26(9):8594-8608. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04296-x. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
10
Globalization and carbon emissions: Is there any role of agriculture value-added, financial development, and natural resource rent in the aftermath of COP21?全球化与碳排放:在 COP21 之后,农业附加值、金融发展和自然资源租金是否在其中发挥作用?
J Environ Manage. 2020 Aug 15;268:110712. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110712. Epub 2020 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Financial development and environmental quality: Does the financial environmental Kuznets Curve Prevail in Australia?金融发展与环境质量:金融环境库兹涅茨曲线在澳大利亚成立吗?
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 26;10(19):e38454. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38454. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
2
Towards a greener future: examining carbon emission dynamics in Asia amid gross domestic product, energy consumption, and trade openness.迈向更绿色的未来:审视亚洲国内生产总值、能源消耗和贸易开放度背景下的碳排放动态。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(14):21488-21508. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32475-y. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
3
Analyzing the impact of access to electricity and biomass energy consumption on infant mortality rate: a global perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Nexus between fossil fuel consumption and infant mortality rate: a non-linear analysis.化石燃料消耗与婴儿死亡率之间的关系:非线性分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(38):58378-58387. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19975-5. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
2
On the nexus between industrialization and carbon emissions: evidence from ASEAN + 3 economies.工业化与碳排放的关系:来自东盟+3 经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(21):31476-31485. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18560-0. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
3
Institutional quality, financial development and the influence of environmental factors on carbon emissions: evidence from a global perspective.
分析电力获取和生物质能源消费对婴儿死亡率的影响:全球视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(11):29550-29565. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24144-9. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
4
Exploring the moderating effect of globalization, financial development and environmental degradation nexus: a roadmap to sustainable development.探索全球化、金融发展与环境退化关系的调节效应:可持续发展路线图。
Environ Dev Sustain. 2022 Sep 21:1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02676-x.
制度质量、金融发展与环境因素对碳排放的影响:全球视角的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(9):13356-13368. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16626-z. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
4
The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emission: evidence from the G8 countries.技术创新、外国直接投资和金融发展对二氧化碳排放的影响:来自八国集团国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(8):11654-11662. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15993-x. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
5
Does financial development cause environmental pollution? Empirical evidence from South Asia.金融发展是否会导致环境污染?来自南亚的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(3):4350-4362. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16005-8. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
6
Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries.技术创新、金融发展、可再生能源与生态足迹的动态关系:基于亚太经合组织国家 STIRPAT 模型的新见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(12):15519-15536. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11640-z. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
7
The impact of financial development and globalization on environmental quality: evidence from South Asian economies.金融发展和全球化对环境质量的影响:来自南亚经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(7):8088-8101. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11198-w. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
8
How energy service companies moderate the impact of industrialization and urbanization on carbon emissions in China?能源服务公司如何缓解工业化和城镇化对中国碳排放的影响?
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jan 10;751:141610. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141610. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
9
Impact of globalization, economic factors and energy consumption on CO emissions in Pakistan.全球化、经济因素及能源消耗对巴基斯坦二氧化碳排放的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Oct 20;688:424-436. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.065. Epub 2019 Jun 16.
10
Natural resources, globalization, and economic growth: evidence from Pakistan.自然资源、全球化与经济增长:来自巴基斯坦的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(15):15527-15534. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04890-z. Epub 2019 Apr 2.