• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常见认知筛查测试(标准化简易精神状态检查表和罗兰通用痴呆评估量表)与认知功能独立性测量之间的关系。

The relationship between common cognitive screening tests (Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination and Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale) and the Cognitive Functional Independence Measure.

作者信息

Fox Sarah Therese, Thompson Leah Elizabeth, Rowland Jeffrey T J

机构信息

Internal Medicine Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

出版信息

Australas J Ageing. 2022 Mar;41(1):106-115. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12998. Epub 2021 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1111/ajag.12998
PMID:34585484
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether the Cognitive Functional Independence Measure (Cog-FIM) is correlated with the Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) and Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) and whether there is agreement between the Cog-FIM and these two tests.

METHODS

Functional Independence Measure assessments were undertaken on 98 subacute patients. Forty-eight (48) patients were administered the SMMSE, and 50 were administered the RUDAS. Agreement was examined using the Bland-Altman plot.

RESULTS

Correlation was observed between the Cog-FIM and both the SMMSE and the RUDAS. The Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated agreement between the Cog-FIM and RUDAS, but not the Cog-FIM and SMMSE. The limits of agreement between the Cog-FIM and RUDAS were -13 to 13.

CONCLUSIONS

The Cog-FIM is correlated with the RUDAS, but the agreement is unclear. Despite agreement of the means, the limits of agreement are large, which may suggest a clinically meaningful difference. The study should be repeated with a larger sample size.

摘要

目的

评估认知功能独立性测量量表(Cog-FIM)与标准化简易精神状态检查表(SMMSE)及罗兰通用痴呆评估量表(RUDAS)是否相关,以及Cog-FIM与这两项测试之间是否具有一致性。

方法

对98例亚急性患者进行了功能独立性测量评估。48例患者接受了SMMSE测试,50例患者接受了RUDAS测试。使用布兰德-奥特曼图检查一致性。

结果

观察到Cog-FIM与SMMSE和RUDAS均存在相关性。布兰德-奥特曼分析表明Cog-FIM与RUDAS之间具有一致性,但Cog-FIM与SMMSE之间不存在一致性。Cog-FIM与RUDAS之间的一致性界限为-13至13。

结论

Cog-FIM与RUDAS相关,但一致性不明确。尽管均值具有一致性,但一致性界限较大,这可能表明存在具有临床意义的差异。应使用更大的样本量重复该研究。

相似文献

1
The relationship between common cognitive screening tests (Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination and Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale) and the Cognitive Functional Independence Measure.常见认知筛查测试(标准化简易精神状态检查表和罗兰通用痴呆评估量表)与认知功能独立性测量之间的关系。
Australas J Ageing. 2022 Mar;41(1):106-115. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12998. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
2
Comparative analysis of rowland universal dementia assessment scale and mini-mental state examination in cognitive assessment of traumatic brain injury patients.罗文通用痴呆评估量表和简易精神状态检查在颅脑损伤患者认知评估中的对比分析。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2021;49(1):39-46. doi: 10.3233/NRE-210044.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Swedish Version of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS-S) for Multicultural Cognitive Screening in Swedish Memory Clinics.《罗文通用认知评估量表(RUDAS-S)瑞典语版在瑞典记忆诊所进行多文化认知筛查的诊断准确性》
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;89(3):865-876. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220233.
4
The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) as a reliable screening tool for dementia when administered via videoconferencing in elderly post-acute hospital patients.罗兰普遍失智评估量表(RUDAS)在老年康复医院患者中经视讯评估时,是一种可靠的失智症筛检工具。
J Telemed Telecare. 2012 Apr;18(3):176-9. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2012.SFT113. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
5
Comparing the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale in a multicultural rehabilitation setting.在多元文化的康复环境中比较蒙特利尔认知评估和罗兰多通用痴呆评估量表。
Intern Med J. 2019 Aug;49(8):1035-1040. doi: 10.1111/imj.14392.
6
Validation of the Arabic Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (A-RUDAS) in elderly with mild and moderate dementia.阿拉伯版罗兰通用痴呆评估量表(A-RUDAS)在轻度和中度痴呆老年人中的效度验证。
Aging Ment Health. 2016 Aug;20(8):880-7. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1043620. Epub 2015 May 18.
7
Screening for Cognitive Dysfunction Using the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease.使用罗伦通用痴呆评估量表在镰状细胞病成人中筛查认知功能障碍。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e217039. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7039.
8
Reliability and validity of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale for patients with traumatic brain injury.罗澜通用失智评估量表用于颅脑损伤患者的信度和效度。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Sep-Oct;29(5):1160-1166. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2020.1856850. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
9
Barriers in screening for dementia in elderly migrants in primary care and the use of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale. A mixed cross-sectional and qualitative study.老年移民在初级保健中进行痴呆筛查的障碍以及罗文通用痴呆评估量表的使用。一项混合横断面和定性研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2021 Dec;27(1):45-50. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1913116.
10
Cognitive assessments in multicultural populations using the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用罗兰通用痴呆评估量表对多元文化人群进行认知评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
CMAJ. 2015 Mar 17;187(5):E169-75. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.140802. Epub 2015 Feb 17.