Russell Ryan D, Roberts-Thomson Katherine M, Hu Donghua, Greenaway Timothy, Betik Andrew C, Parker Lewan, Sharman James E, Richards Stephen M, Rattigan Stephen, Premilovac Dino, Wadley Glenn D, Keske Michelle A
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Health Professions, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, TX, USA.
Diabetologia. 2022 Jan;65(1):216-225. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05572-7. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Microvascular blood flow (MBF) increases in skeletal muscle postprandially to aid in glucose delivery and uptake in muscle. This vascular action is impaired in individuals who are obese or have type 2 diabetes. Whether MBF is impaired in normoglycaemic people at risk of type 2 diabetes is unknown. We aimed to determine whether apparently healthy people at risk of type 2 diabetes display impaired skeletal muscle microvascular responses to a mixed-nutrient meal.
In this cross-sectional study, participants with no family history of type 2 diabetes (FH-) for two generations (n = 18), participants with a positive family history of type 2 diabetes (FH+; i.e. a parent with type 2 diabetes; n = 16) and those with type 2 diabetes (n = 12) underwent a mixed meal challenge (MMC). Metabolic responses (blood glucose, plasma insulin and indirect calorimetry) were measured before and during the MMC. Skeletal muscle large artery haemodynamics (2D and Doppler ultrasound, and Mobil-O-graph) and microvascular responses (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) were measured at baseline and 1 h post MMC.
Despite normal blood glucose concentrations, FH+ individuals displayed impaired metabolic flexibility (reduced ability to switch from fat to carbohydrate oxidation vs FH-; p < 0.05) during the MMC. The MMC increased forearm muscle microvascular blood volume in both the FH- (1.3-fold, p < 0.01) and FH+ (1.3-fold, p < 0.05) groups but not in participants with type 2 diabetes. However, the MMC increased MBF (1.9-fold, p < 0.01), brachial artery diameter (1.1-fold, p < 0.01) and brachial artery blood flow (1.7-fold, p < 0.001) and reduced vascular resistance (0.7-fold, p < 0.001) only in FH- participants, with these changes being absent in FH+ and type 2 diabetes. Participants with type 2 diabetes displayed significantly higher vascular stiffness (p < 0.001) compared with those in the FH- and FH+ groups; however, vascular stiffness did not change during the MMC in any participant group.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Normoglycaemic FH+ participants display impaired postprandial skeletal muscle macro- and microvascular responses, suggesting that poor vascular responses to a meal may contribute to their increased risk of type 2 diabetes. We conclude that vascular insulin resistance may be an early precursor to type 2 diabetes in humans, which can be revealed using an MMC.
目的/假设:餐后骨骼肌微血管血流量(MBF)增加,有助于肌肉中的葡萄糖输送和摄取。肥胖或2型糖尿病患者的这种血管作用受损。血糖正常但有2型糖尿病风险的人群中MBF是否受损尚不清楚。我们旨在确定有2型糖尿病风险的看似健康的人是否表现出骨骼肌微血管对混合营养膳食的反应受损。
在这项横断面研究中,两代内无2型糖尿病家族史(FH-)的参与者(n = 18)、有2型糖尿病家族史阳性(FH+;即父母患有2型糖尿病;n = 16)的参与者以及2型糖尿病患者(n = 12)接受了混合膳食挑战(MMC)。在MMC之前和期间测量代谢反应(血糖、血浆胰岛素和间接量热法)。在基线和MMC后1小时测量骨骼肌大动脉血流动力学(二维和多普勒超声,以及Mobil-O-graph)和微血管反应(对比增强超声)。
尽管血糖浓度正常,但FH+个体在MMC期间表现出代谢灵活性受损(与FH-相比,从脂肪氧化转换为碳水化合物氧化的能力降低;p < 0.05)。MMC使FH-组(1.3倍,p < 0.01)和FH+组(1.3倍,p < 0.05)的前臂肌肉微血管血容量增加,但2型糖尿病参与者未增加。然而,MMC仅使FH-参与者的MBF增加(1.9倍,p < 0.01)、肱动脉直径增加(1.1倍,p < 0.01)和肱动脉血流量增加(1.7倍,p < 0.001),并降低血管阻力(0.7倍,p < 0.001),FH+和2型糖尿病患者无这些变化。与FH-组和FH+组相比,2型糖尿病参与者的血管僵硬度显著更高(p < 0.001);然而,在任何参与者组中,MMC期间血管僵硬度均未改变。
结论/解读:血糖正常的FH+参与者表现出餐后骨骼肌大血管和微血管反应受损,表明对膳食的不良血管反应可能导致其2型糖尿病风险增加。我们得出结论,血管胰岛素抵抗可能是人类2型糖尿病的早期先兆,可通过MMC揭示。