• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用无监督统计监测检测临床试验中的欺诈行为。

Detection of Fraud in a Clinical Trial Using Unsupervised Statistical Monitoring.

机构信息

CluePoints S.A., Avenue Albert Einstein, 2a, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Statistical Consultant, Ingelheim Am Rhein, Germany.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Jan;56(1):130-136. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00341-5. Epub 2021 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-021-00341-5
PMID:34590286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8688378/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A central statistical assessment of the quality of data collected in clinical trials can improve the quality and efficiency of sponsor oversight of clinical investigations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The database of a large randomized clinical trial with known fraud was reanalyzed with a view to identifying, using only statistical monitoring techniques, the center where fraud had been confirmed. The analysis was conducted with an unsupervised statistical monitoring software using mixed-effects statistical models. The statistical analyst was unaware of the location, nature, and extent of the fraud.

RESULTS

Five centers were detected as atypical, including the center with known fraud (which was ranked 2). An incremental analysis showed that the center with known fraud could have been detected after only 25% of its data had been reported.

CONCLUSION

An unsupervised approach to central monitoring, using mixed-effects statistical models, is effective at detecting centers with fraud or other data anomalies in clinical trials.

摘要

背景

对临床试验中收集的数据进行集中统计评估可以提高赞助商对临床研究监督的质量和效率。

材料和方法

对一个已知存在欺诈的大型随机临床试验数据库进行重新分析,目的是仅使用统计监测技术确定已确认欺诈的中心。该分析使用无监督统计监测软件和混合效应统计模型进行。统计分析师不知道欺诈的位置、性质和程度。

结果

发现五个中心是异常的,包括已知欺诈的中心(排名第二)。增量分析表明,在仅报告了其 25%的数据后,就可以检测到已知欺诈的中心。

结论

使用混合效应统计模型进行无监督的集中监测方法可有效检测临床试验中存在欺诈或其他数据异常的中心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b46/8688378/ffb3a99da086/43441_2021_341_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b46/8688378/6d44289d8299/43441_2021_341_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b46/8688378/ffb3a99da086/43441_2021_341_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b46/8688378/6d44289d8299/43441_2021_341_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b46/8688378/ffb3a99da086/43441_2021_341_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Detection of Fraud in a Clinical Trial Using Unsupervised Statistical Monitoring.使用无监督统计监测检测临床试验中的欺诈行为。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Jan;56(1):130-136. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00341-5. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
2
Central statistical monitoring: detecting fraud in clinical trials.中心统计监测:发现临床试验中的欺诈行为。
Clin Trials. 2013 Apr;10(2):225-35. doi: 10.1177/1740774512469312. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
3
Detection of atypical data in multicenter clinical trials using unsupervised statistical monitoring.使用无监督统计监测在多中心临床试验中检测非典型数据。
Clin Trials. 2019 Oct;16(5):512-522. doi: 10.1177/1740774519862564. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
4
A computationally simple central monitoring procedure, effectively applied to empirical trial data with known fraud.一种计算简单的中央监测程序,有效地应用于已知存在欺诈行为的实证试验数据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;87:59-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
5
Strategies for dealing with fraud in clinical trials.临床试验中应对欺诈行为的策略。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;21(1):22-7. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0876-6. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
6
The role of biostatistics in the prevention, detection and treatment of fraud in clinical trials.生物统计学在临床试验中欺诈行为的预防、检测和处理中的作用。
Stat Med. 1999 Dec 30;18(24):3435-51. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19991230)18:24<3435::aid-sim365>3.0.co;2-o.
7
Data fraud in clinical trials.临床试验中的数据欺诈。
Clin Investig (Lond). 2015;5(2):161-173. doi: 10.4155/cli.14.116.
8
Statistical challenges for central monitoring in clinical trials: a review.临床试验中集中监测的统计学挑战:综述
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;21(1):28-37. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0914-4. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
9
Data-driven risk identification in phase III clinical trials using central statistical monitoring.在III期临床试验中使用中央统计监测进行数据驱动的风险识别。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;21(1):38-45. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0877-5. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
10
Detecting Data Quality Issues in Clinical Trials: Current Practices and Recommendations.检测临床试验中的数据质量问题:当前实践与建议
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 Jan;50(1):15-21. doi: 10.1177/2168479015620248.

引用本文的文献

1
Trustworthiness assessment as an inclusion criterion for systematic reviews-What is the impact on results?将可信度评估作为系统评价的纳入标准——对结果有何影响?
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 Dec 13;1(10):e12037. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12037. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Central statistical monitoring in clinical trial management: A scoping review.临床试验管理中的中央统计监测:一项范围综述。
Clin Trials. 2025 Jun;22(3):342-351. doi: 10.1177/17407745241304059. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
3
A Clustering Ensemble Method for Drug Safety Signal Detection in Post-Marketing Surveillance.
一种用于上市后监测中药物安全信号检测的聚类集成方法。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Jan;59(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00705-7. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
4
Does Central Statistical Monitoring Improve Data Quality? An Analysis of 1,111 Sites in 159 Clinical Trials.中央统计监测能否提高数据质量?对159项临床试验中1111个研究点的分析
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 May;58(3):483-494. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00613-w. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
5
Assessing the Integrity of Clinical Trials Included in Evidence Syntheses.评估纳入证据综合的临床试验的完整性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 15;20(12):6138. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20126138.