• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[ Stanford B型主动脉夹层合并高血压患者的临床特征及预后危险因素分析 ]

[Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognostic risk factors in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection complicated with hypertension].

作者信息

Chen Zhidan, Yang Junbo, Hu Zhipeng, Chen Dejie, Gu Yongquan

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science and Xiangyang Central Hospital, Xiangyang 441021, Hubei, China.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science and Xiangyang Central Hospital, Xiangyang 441021, Hubei, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Aug;33(8):962-966. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200928-00654.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200928-00654
PMID:34590564
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical characteristics as well as short-term and long-term prognostic factors of patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with hypertension.

METHODS

Patients with TBAD who received thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) admitted to Xiangyang Central Hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 were enrolled. The baseline data of patients admitted to the hospital were collected through the case management system, including gender, age, underlying diseases (hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease), smoking history, drinking history, duration of pain, vital signs at admission [heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP)], laboratory results [white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count (PLT), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), serum creatinine (SCr), C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, ascending aorta diameter], etc. The clinical characteristics of TBAD patients with hypertension were analyzed. Logistic regression model and Cox proportional risk model were used to analyze the impact of hypertension on the short-term and long-term all-cause deaths after TEVAR in TBAD patients.

RESULTS

Among 227 TBAD patients, 160 cases (70.5%) were complicated with hypertension, while 67 cases (29.5%) were not. The average age, the proportion of diabetes and coronary heart disease, and the level of SBP, DBP and SCr at admission of TBAD patients with hypertension were higher than those of TBAD without hypertension [age (years old): 53.1±11.9 vs. 42.8±14.1, combined with diabetes: 8.8% vs. 1.5%, combined with coronary heart disease: 6.3% vs. 0%, SBP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 147.9±18.1 vs. 136.9±15.2, DBP (mmHg): 93.9±11.9 vs. 89.1±13.8, SCr (μmol/L): 97.8±25.4 vs. 89.8±23.6, all P < 0.05]. The short-term mortality of TBAD with hypertension group was significantly higher than that of TBAD without hypertension group [6.3% (10/160) vs. 0% (0/67), χ = 4.386, P = 0.036]. 227 patients with TBAD were followed up for 3-66 months, with a median follow-up time of 25 months. There was no significant difference in long-term mortality between TBAD patients with and without hypertensive during discharge follow-up [13.1% (21/160) vs. 9.0% (6/67), χ = 0.784, P = 0.376]. Further multivariate Logistic regression analysis and Cox regression analysis did not indicate that hypertension was an independent risk factor for short-term and long-term death in TBAD patients [odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were 13.477 (0.541-330.215), 1.012 (0.990-1.035), both P > 0.05]. Age and HR were independent risk factors for the short-term mortality of TBAD patients [OR and 95%CI were 15.287 (1.051-226.415), 0.026 (0.002-0.840), both P < 0.05]. Age, PLT and D-dimer were independent risk factors for the long-term mortality of TBAD patients [OR and 95%CI were 1.808 (1.205-2.711), 0.555 (0.333-0.924), 1.482 (1.035-2.122), respectively, all P < 0.05].

CONCLUSIONS

The TBAD patients with hypertension have older age, high rates of diabetes or coronary heart disease. However, hypertension is not an independent risk factor for short-term and long-term mortality in TBAD patients.

摘要

目的

探讨合并高血压的Stanford B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)患者的临床特征以及短期和长期预后因素。

方法

选取2014年1月至2018年12月在襄阳市中心医院接受胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)的TBAD患者。通过病例管理系统收集患者入院时的基线资料,包括性别、年龄、基础疾病(高血压、糖尿病、冠心病)、吸烟史、饮酒史、疼痛持续时间、入院时生命体征[心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)]、实验室检查结果[白细胞计数(WBC)、血小板计数(PLT)、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血清肌酐(SCr)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、D-二聚体、升主动脉直径]等。分析合并高血压的TBAD患者的临床特征。采用Logistic回归模型和Cox比例风险模型分析高血压对TBAD患者TEVAR术后短期和长期全因死亡的影响。

结果

227例TBAD患者中,160例(70.5%)合并高血压,67例(29.5%)未合并高血压。合并高血压的TBAD患者的平均年龄、糖尿病和冠心病比例以及入院时SBP、DBP和SCr水平均高于未合并高血压的TBAD患者[年龄(岁):53.1±11.9 vs. 42.8±14.1,合并糖尿病:8.8% vs. 1.5%,合并冠心病:6.3% vs. 0%,SBP(mmHg,1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa):147.9±18.1 vs. 136.9±15.2,DBP(mmHg):93.9±11.9 vs. 89.1±13.8,SCr(μmol/L):97.8±25.4 vs. 89.8±23.6,均P < 0.05]。合并高血压的TBAD组短期死亡率显著高于未合并高血压的TBAD组[6.3%(10/160) vs. 0%(0/67),χ = 4.386,P = 0.036]。227例TBAD患者随访3 - 66个月,中位随访时间25个月。出院随访期间合并高血压与未合并高血压TBAD患者的长期死亡率无显著差异[13.1%(21/160) vs. 9.0%(6/67),χ = 0.784,P = 0.376]。进一步多因素Logistic回归分析和Cox回归分析未显示高血压是TBAD患者短期和长期死亡的独立危险因素[比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(95%CI)分别为13.477(0.541 - 330.215)、1.0^12(0.990 - 1.035),均P > 0.05]。年龄和HR是TBAD患者短期死亡的独立危险因素[OR及95%CI分别为15.287(1.051 - 226.415)、0.026(0.002 - 0.840),均P < 0.05]。年龄、PLT和D-二聚体是TBAD患者长期死亡的独立危险因素[OR及95%CI分别为1.808(1.205 - 2.711)、0.555(0.333 - 0.924)、1.482(1.035 - 2.122),均P < 0.05]。

结论

合并高血压的TBAD患者年龄较大,糖尿病或冠心病发生率较高。然而,高血压并非TBAD患者短期和长期死亡的独立危险因素。

相似文献

1
[Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognostic risk factors in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection complicated with hypertension].[ Stanford B型主动脉夹层合并高血压患者的临床特征及预后危险因素分析 ]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Aug;33(8):962-966. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200928-00654.
2
[Analysis of risk factors associated with acute Stanford type B aortic dissection complicated with pleural effusion and observation of the curative effect after intracavitary repair].[急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层合并胸腔积液的危险因素分析及腔内修复术后疗效观察]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 1;62(8):964-971. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20220904-00653.
3
[Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of female patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection].[女性B型主动脉夹层患者的临床特征及预后分析]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 24;51(2):172-179. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20221012-00797.
4
Implications of secondary aortic intervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute and chronic type B dissection.胸主动脉腔内修复术后治疗急性和慢性 B 型夹层的二次主动脉干预的意义。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1367-1378. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.080. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
Unique characteristics of the type B aortic dissection patients with malperfusion in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议中存在灌注不良的 B 型主动脉夹层患者的独特特征。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74(1):53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.11.047. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
6
Risk Factors Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.胸主动脉腔内修复术后 Stanford 型 B 型主动脉夹层患者预后不良的相关危险因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Jul;93:122-127. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
7
Outcomes from the Gore Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B dissection.戈尔全球胸主动脉夹层腔内修复术血管内主动脉治疗注册研究中接受B型夹层腔内主动脉修复术患者的结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;68(5):1314-1323. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.391. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
8
Anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications do not affect aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection.抗凝和抗血小板药物并不影响 B 型主动脉夹层胸主动脉腔内修复术后的主动脉重塑。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Dec;74(6):1833-1842.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.059. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
9
Characterization of syndromic, nonsyndromic familial, and sporadic type B aortic dissection.B 型主动脉夹层的综合征型、非综合征型家族性和散发性特征。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):1906-1914.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.080. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
10
Long-term efficacy of endovascular vs open surgical repair for complicated type-B aortic dissection: a single-center retrospective study and meta-analysis.血管内修复与开放手术修复治疗复杂性B型主动脉夹层的长期疗效:一项单中心回顾性研究及荟萃分析。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016;49(6):e5194. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20165194. Epub 2016 May 31.