• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层合并胸腔积液的危险因素分析及腔内修复术后疗效观察]

[Analysis of risk factors associated with acute Stanford type B aortic dissection complicated with pleural effusion and observation of the curative effect after intracavitary repair].

作者信息

Zheng L F, Meng D J, Wang Y S, Zhou T N, Wang X Z

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 1;62(8):964-971. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20220904-00653.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20220904-00653
PMID:37528034
Abstract

To investigate the risk factors of acute Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) complicated with pleural effusion (PE) and the short-term and long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). A case-control study. The clinical and imaging data of 1 083 patients with acute TBAD admitted to the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from April 2002 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 211 cases with pleural effusion and 872 cases without pleural effusion. The baseline analysis of the two groups of patients was performed. The risk factors associated with pleural effusion were analyzed by binary logistic regression, and the results were expressed as odds ratio () and 95% confidence interval (). According to the quantity of pleural effusion, they were simultaneously divided into small pleural effusion group and medium large pleural effusion group, to compare the short-term and long-term effects of TEVAR patients with different amounts of pleural effusion. The incidence of pericardial effusion (17.5% vs. 3.8%, <0.001), anemia (21.3% vs. 12.5%, =0.001), aortic spiral tear (49.8% vs. 37.8%, =0.002), dissection tear over diaphragm (57.8% vs. 48.1%, =0.011), serum creatinine [85 (69, 111) vs. 81 (67, 100) μmol/L, =0.011] and white blood cell levels[(11.3±4.2)×10/L vs. (10.3±4.2)×10/L, =0.002] in acute TBAD pleural effusion group were significantly higher than those in non-pleural effusion group, and the hemoglobin level was significantly lower than that in non-pleural effusion group [(128±20) vs. (133±17) g/L, <0.05]. Logistic stepwise regression analysis showed that pericardial effusion (=5.038,95% 2.962-8.568,<0.001), anemia (=2.047,95% 1.361-3.079,=0.001), spiral tear (=1.551,95% 1.030-2.336=0.002) and elevated white blood cell (=1.059,95% 1.011-1.102, =0.005) were independent risk factors for TBAD complicated with pleural effusion. The incidences of all-cause death (4/19 vs. 1.5% vs. 0.9%, <0.001), aortogenic death (4/19 vs. 0.7% vs. 0.7%, <0.001) and aortic related adverse events (4/19 vs. 1.5% vs. 1.1%, <0.001) in patients with large pleural effusion during TEVAR operation were significantly higher than those in patients with small pleural effusion and those without pleural effusion, and the differences were statistically significant. At 1 month follow-up after TEVAR, the incidence of all-cause death (4/16 vs. 3.3% vs. 1.6%, <0.001), aortogenic death (4/16 vs. 0.8% vs.0.7%, <0.001), aorta related adverse events (4/16 vs. 4.1% vs. 4.7%, =0.013) and overall clinical adverse events (4/16 vs.9.8% vs. 6.7%, =0.014) in the medium and large thoracic group were significantly higher than those in the small pleural effusion group and no pleural effusion group, and the differences were statistically significant. At 1 year follow-up after TEVAR, the incidence of all-cause death (4/15 vs. 4.9% vs. 3.9%, =0.004), aortogenic death (4/15 vs.2.5% vs. 2.1%, <0.001), aorta related adverse events (5/15 vs. 11.5% vs. 9.4%, =0.012) and overall clinical adverse events (5/15 vs. 18.9% vs. 13.1%, =0.029) in the medium and large thoracic group were significantly higher than those in the small pleural effusion group and no pleural effusion group, and the differences were statistically significant. Single center data showed that pericardial effusion, anemia, spiral tear and elevated white blood cell were independent risk factors for acute TBAD complicated with pleural effusion; the early (1 month) and long-term (1 year) rates of all-cause death, aortic mortality, aortic adverse events and overall clinical adverse events were significantly higher in TBAD patients with moderate pleural effusion after TEVAR, and moderate and large pleural effusion was an independent risk factor for near and long-term aortic related adverse events after TEVAR surgery.

摘要

探讨急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)合并胸腔积液(PE)的危险因素以及胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)的短期和长期疗效。一项病例对照研究。回顾性分析2002年4月至2020年12月北部战区总医院收治的1083例急性TBAD患者的临床和影像学资料,其中合并胸腔积液211例,未合并胸腔积液872例。对两组患者进行基线分析。采用二元logistic回归分析与胸腔积液相关的危险因素,结果以比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示。根据胸腔积液量,将其同时分为少量胸腔积液组和中大量胸腔积液组,比较不同胸腔积液量的TEVAR患者的短期和长期疗效。急性TBAD胸腔积液组心包积液发生率(17.5% vs. 3.8%,P<0.001)、贫血发生率(21.3% vs. 12.5%,P=0.001)、主动脉螺旋撕裂发生率(49.8% vs. 37.8%,P=0.002)、膈肌上撕裂发生率(57.8% vs. 48.1%,P=0.011)、血清肌酐[85(69,111)vs. 81(67,100)μmol/L,P=0.011]及白细胞水平[(11.3±4.2)×10⁹/L vs. (10.3±4.2)×10⁹/L,P=0.002]均显著高于非胸腔积液组,血红蛋白水平显著低于非胸腔积液组[(128±20)vs. (133±17)g/L,P<0.05]。Logistic逐步回归分析显示,心包积液(OR=5.038,95%CI 2.962-8.568,P<0.001)、贫血(OR=2.047,95%CI 1.361-3.079,P=0.001)、螺旋撕裂(OR=1.551,95%CI 1.030-2.336,P=0.002)及白细胞升高(OR=1.059,95%CI 1.011-1.102,P=0.005)是TBAD合并胸腔积液的独立危险因素。TEVAR术中大量胸腔积液患者全因死亡发生率(4/19 vs. 1.5% vs. 0.9%,P<0.001)、主动脉源性死亡发生率(4/19 vs. 0.7% vs. 0.7%,P<0.001)及主动脉相关不良事件发生率(4/19 vs. 1.5% vs. 1.1%,P<0.001)均显著高于少量胸腔积液患者及无胸腔积液患者,差异有统计学意义。TEVAR术后1个月随访,中大量胸腔积液组全因死亡发生率(4/16 vs. 3.3% vs. 1.6%,P<0.001)、主动脉源性死亡发生率(4/16 vs. 0.8% vs.0.7%,P<0.001)、主动脉相关不良事件发生率(4/16 vs. 4.1% vs. 4.7%,P=0.013)及总体临床不良事件发生率(4/16 vs.9.8% vs. 6.7%,P=0.014)均显著高于少量胸腔积液组及无胸腔积液组,差异有统计学意义。TEVAR术后1年随访,中大量胸腔积液组全因死亡发生率(4/15 vs. 4.9% vs. 3.9%,P=0.004)、主动脉源性死亡发生率(4/15 vs.2.5% vs. 2.1%,P<0.001)、主动脉相关不良事件发生率(5/15 vs. 11.5% vs. 9.4%,P=0.012)及总体临床不良事件发生率(5/15 vs. 18.9% vs. 13.1%,P=0.029)均显著高于少量胸腔积液组及无胸腔积液组,差异有统计学意义。单中心数据表明,心包积液、贫血、螺旋撕裂及白细胞升高是急性TBAD合并胸腔积液的独立危险因素;TEVAR术后中量胸腔积液的TBAD患者早期(1个月)和长期(1年)全因死亡、主动脉死亡、主动脉不良事件及总体临床不良事件发生率均显著升高,中大量胸腔积液是TEVAR术后近期和长期主动脉相关不良事件的独立危险因素。

相似文献

1
[Analysis of risk factors associated with acute Stanford type B aortic dissection complicated with pleural effusion and observation of the curative effect after intracavitary repair].[急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层合并胸腔积液的危险因素分析及腔内修复术后疗效观察]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 1;62(8):964-971. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20220904-00653.
2
[Clinical study on the classification of renal artery involvement and comparison of renal function and prognosis of Stanford type B aortic dissection after thoracic aortic endovascular repair].[胸主动脉腔内修复术后Stanford B型主动脉夹层肾动脉受累分型及肾功能与预后比较的临床研究]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Mar 1;62(3):297-303. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20220308-00159.
3
Implications of secondary aortic intervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute and chronic type B dissection.胸主动脉腔内修复术后治疗急性和慢性 B 型夹层的二次主动脉干预的意义。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1367-1378. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.080. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
4
Outcomes of post-implantation syndrome after endovascular repair for Stanford type B aortic dissection.斯坦福B型主动脉夹层腔内修复术后植入后综合征的结局
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;79(6):1326-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.01.200. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
5
Readmission after early thoracic endovascular aortic repair versus medical management of acute type B aortic dissection.急性 B 型主动脉夹层早期血管内修复与内科治疗后的再入院率比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 May;77(5):1387-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.064. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
6
[Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of female patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection].[女性B型主动脉夹层患者的临床特征及预后分析]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 24;51(2):172-179. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20221012-00797.
7
[Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognostic risk factors in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection complicated with hypertension].[ Stanford B型主动脉夹层合并高血压患者的临床特征及预后危险因素分析 ]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Aug;33(8):962-966. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200928-00654.
8
Outcomes of Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection and High-Risk Features.急性 B 型主动脉夹层伴高危特征患者的转归。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Sep;106:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
9
Surgical Outcomes And Postoperative Descending Aorta Morphologic Remodeling After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair For Acute And Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection.胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗急性和慢性 B 型主动脉夹层的手术结果及术后降主动脉形态重塑。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Nov 6;14:1925-1935. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S225305. eCollection 2019.
10
Outcomes from the Gore Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B dissection.戈尔全球胸主动脉夹层腔内修复术血管内主动脉治疗注册研究中接受B型夹层腔内主动脉修复术患者的结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;68(5):1314-1323. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.391. Epub 2018 Jun 23.