Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Dec;74(6):1833-1842.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.059. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
There is a lack of evidence regarding the effect of anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications on aortic remodeling for aortic dissection after endovascular repair. We investigated whether anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications affect aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD).
Records of the Vascular Quality Initiative TEVAR registry (2012-2020) were reviewed. Procedures performed for TBAD were included. Aortic reintervention, false lumen thrombosis of the treated aorta, and all-cause mortality at follow-up were compared between patients treated with and without anticoagulation medications. A secondary analysis was performed to assess the effect of antiplatelet therapy in patients not on anticoagulation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies on outcomes.
A total of 1210 patients (mean age, 60.7 ± 12.2 years; 825 males [68%]) were identified with a mean follow-up of 21.2 ± 15.7 months (range, 1-94 months). One hundred sixty-six patients (14%) were on anticoagulation medications at discharge and at follow-up. Patients on anticoagulation were more likely to be older (mean age, 65.5 vs 60 years; P < .001) and Caucasian (69% vs 55%; P = .003), with higher proportions of coronary artery disease (10% vs 3%; P < .001), congestive heart failure (10% vs 2%; P < .001), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (15% vs 9%; P = .017). There were no differences in the mean preoperative thoracic aortic diameter or the number of endografts used. At 18 months, the rates of aortic reinterventions (8% vs 9%; log-rank P = .873), complete false lumen thrombosis (52% vs 45%; P = .175), and mortality (2.5% vs 2.7%; P = .209) were similar in patients with and without anticoagulation, respectively. Controlling for covariates with the Cox regression method, anticoagulation use was not independently associated with a decreased rates of complete false lumen thrombosis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-1.1; P = .132), increased need for aortic reinterventions (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.62-1.68; P = .934), and mortality (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.64-2.47; P = .514). On a secondary analysis, antiplatelet medications did not affect the rates of aortic reintervention, complete false lumen thrombosis, and mortality.
Anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications do not appear to negatively influence the midterm endpoints of aortic reintervention or death in patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD. Moreover, it did not impair complete false lumen thrombosis. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications do not adversely affect aortic remodeling and survival in this population at midterm.
关于主动脉夹层血管内修复术后抗凝和抗血小板药物对主动脉重塑的影响,目前证据不足。我们研究了抗凝和抗血小板药物是否会影响胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)治疗 B 型主动脉夹层(TBAD)后的主动脉重塑。
回顾了血管质量倡议 TEVAR 注册中心(2012-2020 年)的记录。纳入了 TBAD 患者的手术记录。比较了使用和未使用抗凝药物的患者在随访期间的主动脉再干预、治疗主动脉的假腔血栓形成和全因死亡率。进行了二次分析以评估未接受抗凝治疗的患者抗血小板治疗的效果。使用 Cox 比例风险模型估计抗凝和抗血小板治疗对结局的影响。
共纳入 1210 例患者(平均年龄 60.7±12.2 岁;825 例男性[68%]),平均随访 21.2±15.7 个月(范围 1-94 个月)。出院时和随访时,有 166 例(14%)患者使用抗凝药物。使用抗凝药物的患者更可能年龄较大(平均年龄 65.5 岁比 60 岁;P<0.001)且为白人(69%比 55%;P=0.003),有更高比例的冠心病(10%比 3%;P<0.001)、充血性心力衰竭(10%比 2%;P<0.001)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(15%比 9%;P=0.017)。术前胸主动脉直径和使用的血管内移植物数量无差异。18 个月时,主动脉再干预的发生率(8%比 9%;对数秩检验 P=0.873)、完全假腔血栓形成的发生率(52%比 45%;P=0.175)和死亡率(2.5%比 2.7%;P=0.209)在使用和未使用抗凝药物的患者中相似。通过 Cox 回归方法控制协变量后,抗凝药物的使用与完全假腔血栓形成(风险比 [HR],0.74;95%置信区间 [CI],0.5-1.1;P=0.132)、主动脉再干预的需要(HR,1.02;95%CI,0.62-1.68;P=0.934)和死亡率(HR,1.25;95%CI,0.64-2.47;P=0.514)的降低无关。在二次分析中,抗血小板药物并不影响主动脉再干预、完全假腔血栓形成和死亡率的发生率。
在 TBAD 患者接受 TEVAR 治疗后,抗凝和抗血小板药物似乎不会对主动脉再干预或死亡的中期结果产生负面影响。此外,它并未损害完全假腔血栓形成。在该人群中,抗凝和抗血小板药物在中期不会对主动脉重塑和生存产生不利影响。