Sobel Halle G, Warrington Jill S, Francis-Fath Samuel, Crocker Abigail M, Berger Claudia A
University of Vermont, Robert Larner College of Medicine, VT, Burlington, USA.
Department of General Internal Medicine, Larner College of Medicine University of Vermont, VT, Burlington, USA.
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021 Sep 30;16(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13722-021-00264-4.
Urine drug screening (UDS) is commonly used as part of treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), including treatment with buprenorphine-naloxone for OUD in a primary care setting. Very little is known about the value of UDS, the optimum screening frequency in general, or its specific use for buprenorphine treatment in primary care. To address this question, we thought that in a stable population receiving buprenorphine-naloxone in the primary care setting it would be useful to know how often UDS yielded expected and unexpected results.
We present a descriptive analysis of UDS results in patients treated with buprenorphine-naloxone for OUD in a primary care setting over a two-year period. An unexpected test result is: 1. A negative test for buprenorphine and/or 2. A positive test for opioids, methadone, cocaine and/or heroin.
A total of 161 patients received care during the study period and a total of 2588 test results were analyzed from this population. We found that 64.4% of the patient population (n = 104 patients) demonstrated both treatment adherence (as measured by buprenorphine positive test results) and no apparent unexpected test findings, as defined by negative tests for opioids, methadone, cocaine and heroin. Of the 161 patients, 20 results were positive for opioids, 5 for methadone, 39 for heroin and 2 for cocaine. Analysis at the UDS level demonstrated that, of the 2588 test results, 38 (1.5%) results did not have buprenorphine. Of the 2588, 28 (1.1%) test results were positive for opioids, 8 (0.3%) were positive for methadone, 39 (1.5%) for cocaine and 2 (0.1%) for heroin.
Given that the majority of patients in our study had expected urine results, it may be reasonable for less frequent urine testing in certain patients.
尿液药物筛查(UDS)通常作为阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)治疗的一部分,包括在初级保健机构中使用丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮治疗OUD。关于UDS的价值、一般的最佳筛查频率,或其在初级保健中用于丁丙诺啡治疗的具体用途,人们所知甚少。为了解决这个问题,我们认为在初级保健机构中接受丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮治疗的稳定人群中,了解UDS产生预期和意外结果的频率会很有帮助。
我们对在初级保健机构中接受丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮治疗OUD的患者在两年期间的UDS结果进行了描述性分析。意外检测结果为:1. 丁丙诺啡检测呈阴性;和/或2. 阿片类物质、美沙酮、可卡因和/或海洛因检测呈阳性。
在研究期间共有161名患者接受治疗,对该人群共分析了2588份检测结果。我们发现,64.4%的患者群体(n = 104名患者)表现出治疗依从性(通过丁丙诺啡检测呈阳性结果衡量)且没有明显的意外检测结果,意外检测结果定义为阿片类物质、美沙酮、可卡因和海洛因检测呈阴性。在这161名患者中,20份检测结果阿片类物质呈阳性,5份美沙酮呈阳性,39份海洛因呈阳性,2份可卡因呈阳性。在UDS层面的分析表明,在2588份检测结果中,38份(1.5%)结果未检测到丁丙诺啡。在2588份结果中,28份(1.1%)检测结果阿片类物质呈阳性,8份(0.3%)美沙酮呈阳性,39份(1.5%)可卡因呈阳性,2份(0.1%)海洛因呈阳性。
鉴于我们研究中的大多数患者尿液检测结果符合预期,对于某些患者减少尿液检测频率可能是合理的。