Department of Anesthesiology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 30;11(1):19517. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98507-6.
Whether aortic stenosis (AS) increases perioperative risk in noncardiac surgery remains controversial. Limited information is available regarding adequate anesthetic techniques for patients with AS. Using the reimbursement claims data of Taiwan's National Health Insurance, we performed propensity score matching analyses to evaluate the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with or without AS undergoing noncardiac surgery between 2008 and 2013. We also compared the perioperative risk of AS patients undergoing general anesthesia or neuraxial anesthesia. Multivariable logistic regressions were applied to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for postoperative mortality and major complications. The matching procedure generated 9741 matched pairs for analyses. AS was significantly associated with 30-day in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.67), acute renal failure (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.12-1.79), pneumonia (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33), stroke (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.29), and intensive care unit stay (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.27-1.49). Compared with neuraxial anesthesia, general anesthesia was associated with increased risks of acute myocardial infarction (aOR 3.06, 95% CI 1.22-7.67), pneumonia (aOR 1.80, 95% CI 1.32-2.46), acute renal failure (aOR 1.82, 95% CI 1.11-2.98), and intensive care (aOR 4.05, 95% CI 3.23-5.09). The findings were generally consistent across subgroups. AS was an independent risk factor for adverse events after noncardiac surgery. In addition, general anesthesia was associated with greater postoperative complications in AS patients compared to neuraxial anesthesia. This real-world evidence suggests that neuraxial anesthesia should not be contraindicated in patients with AS.
主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)是否会增加非心脏手术的围手术期风险仍存在争议。有关 AS 患者的适当麻醉技术的信息有限。我们使用台湾全民健康保险的报销索赔数据,通过倾向评分匹配分析评估了 2008 年至 2013 年间行非心脏手术的 AS 患者与无 AS 患者发生不良结局的风险。我们还比较了行全身麻醉或脊麻的 AS 患者的围手术期风险。多变量逻辑回归用于计算术后死亡率和主要并发症的调整优势比(aOR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。匹配程序为分析生成了 9741 对匹配对。AS 与 30 天院内死亡率(aOR 1.31,95%CI 1.03-1.67)、急性肾损伤(aOR 1.42,95%CI 1.12-1.79)、肺炎(aOR 1.16,95%CI 1.02-1.33)、中风(aOR 1.14,95%CI 1.01-1.29)和重症监护病房入住(aOR 1.38,95%CI 1.27-1.49)显著相关。与脊麻相比,全身麻醉与急性心肌梗死(aOR 3.06,95%CI 1.22-7.67)、肺炎(aOR 1.80,95%CI 1.32-2.46)、急性肾损伤(aOR 1.82,95%CI 1.11-2.98)和重症监护(aOR 4.05,95%CI 3.23-5.09)的风险增加相关。亚组分析结果基本一致。AS 是非心脏手术后不良事件的独立危险因素。此外,与脊麻相比,全身麻醉与 AS 患者术后并发症更多。这一真实世界的证据表明,AS 患者不应禁忌使用脊麻。