Lohman Trevor, Bains Gurinder, Berk Lee, Lohman Everett
School of Allied Health Professions, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021 Sep 26;7:23337214211046419. doi: 10.1177/23337214211046419. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
As healthspan and lifespan research breakthroughs have become more commonplace, the need for valid, practical markers of biological age is becoming increasingly paramount. The accessibility and affordability of biological age predictors that can reveal information about mortality and morbidity risk, as well as remaining years of life, has profound clinical and research implications. In this review, we examine 5 groups of aging biomarkers capable of providing accurate biological age estimations. The unique capabilities of these biomarkers have far reaching implications for the testing of both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions designed to slow or reverse biological aging. Additionally, the enhanced validity and availability of these tools may have increasingly relevant clinical value. The authors of this review explore those implications, with an emphasis on lifestyle modification research, and provide an overview of the current evidence regarding 5 biological age predictor categories: Telomere length, composite biomarkers, DNA methylation "epigenetic clocks," transcriptional predictors of biological age, and functional age predictors.
随着健康寿命和寿命研究突破变得越来越普遍,对有效的、实用的生物学年龄标志物的需求变得越来越至关重要。能够揭示死亡率和发病率风险以及剩余寿命信息的生物学年龄预测指标的可及性和可承受性具有深远的临床和研究意义。在本综述中,我们研究了5组能够提供准确生物学年龄估计的衰老生物标志物。这些生物标志物的独特能力对旨在减缓或逆转生物衰老的药物和非药物干预措施的测试具有深远影响。此外,这些工具有效性的提高和可用性可能具有越来越重要的临床价值。本综述的作者探讨了这些影响,重点是生活方式改变研究,并概述了关于5种生物学年龄预测指标类别的当前证据:端粒长度、复合生物标志物、DNA甲基化“表观遗传时钟”、生物学年龄的转录预测指标和功能年龄预测指标。