Neurology Department, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Department of Pediatrics, Saint George Hospital University Medical Center, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon.
Epilepsia Open. 2021 Dec;6(4):727-735. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12544. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency of paroxysmal spells of indeterminate nature (PSIN) in a large cohort of children and adults with suspected new-onset seizures, to evaluate the reasons for including patients in this category, and to calculate the rate of erroneous diagnoses if the epileptologists were compelled to label those events as epileptic seizures or nonepileptic paroxysmal spells.
Patients identified for this study participated in a prospective study evaluating patients with suspected new-onset unprovoked seizures. The workup included a detailed history and a thorough description of the spells, a 3-hour video EEG recording, and an epilepsy protocol brain MRI. Based exclusively on a detailed description of the ictal events, two epileptologists were asked to independently classify each patient into those with a definite diagnosis of unprovoked seizures or a definite diagnosis of a nonepileptic paroxysmal spells (group 1) and those with PSIN (group 2).
A total of 1880 consecutive patients were enrolled with 255 (13.6%) included in the PSIN group. Patients with PSIN were significantly younger than those with a definite diagnosis, and PSIN were significantly more frequent in children with developmental delay. The most common reason for including patients in the PSIN group was the inability to categorically discriminate between a seizure and a nonepileptic mimicker. When the raters were compelled to classify the spells in the PSIN group, the frequencies of erroneous diagnoses ranged between 32% and 38%. The final diagnoses on those patients were made based on the results of the EEG, MRI, and follow-up visits.
Our data indicate that a diagnostic category of PSIN should be recognized and ought to be used in clinical practice. Acknowledging this uncertainty will result in lower frequencies of erroneous diagnoses, possible stigma, and potential exposure to unnecessary antiseizure medications.
本研究旨在评估疑似新发癫痫患者中阵发性不定性发作(PSIN)的频率,评估将患者归入此类别的原因,并计算如果癫痫专家被迫将这些事件标记为癫痫发作或非癫痫性阵发性发作,错误诊断的发生率。
参与本研究的患者参加了一项评估疑似新发无诱因癫痫发作患者的前瞻性研究。该研究包括详细的病史和对发作的详细描述、3 小时视频脑电图记录和癫痫协议脑 MRI。仅根据对癫痫发作事件的详细描述,两名癫痫专家被要求独立地将每位患者分类为明确诊断为无诱因癫痫发作或明确诊断为非癫痫性阵发性发作(组 1)和 PSIN(组 2)的患者。
共纳入 1880 例连续患者,其中 255 例(13.6%)归入 PSIN 组。PSIN 患者明显比明确诊断的患者年轻,且 PSIN 在发育迟缓的儿童中更为常见。将患者归入 PSIN 组的最常见原因是无法明确区分癫痫发作和非癫痫性模仿物。当评估者被迫将 PSIN 组中的发作进行分类时,错误诊断的频率在 32%至 38%之间。对这些患者的最终诊断是基于 EEG、MRI 和随访结果得出的。
我们的数据表明,应认识到 PSIN 这一诊断类别,并应在临床实践中使用。承认这种不确定性将降低错误诊断的频率、可能的污名化和潜在的暴露于不必要的抗癫痫药物。