Suppr超能文献

承认新发阵发性发作患者诊断不确定性的重要性。

The importance of acknowledging diagnostic uncertainty in patients with new-onset paroxysmal spells.

机构信息

Neurology Department, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

Department of Pediatrics, Saint George Hospital University Medical Center, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Epilepsia Open. 2021 Dec;6(4):727-735. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12544. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency of paroxysmal spells of indeterminate nature (PSIN) in a large cohort of children and adults with suspected new-onset seizures, to evaluate the reasons for including patients in this category, and to calculate the rate of erroneous diagnoses if the epileptologists were compelled to label those events as epileptic seizures or nonepileptic paroxysmal spells.

METHODS

Patients identified for this study participated in a prospective study evaluating patients with suspected new-onset unprovoked seizures. The workup included a detailed history and a thorough description of the spells, a 3-hour video EEG recording, and an epilepsy protocol brain MRI. Based exclusively on a detailed description of the ictal events, two epileptologists were asked to independently classify each patient into those with a definite diagnosis of unprovoked seizures or a definite diagnosis of a nonepileptic paroxysmal spells (group 1) and those with PSIN (group 2).

RESULTS

A total of 1880 consecutive patients were enrolled with 255 (13.6%) included in the PSIN group. Patients with PSIN were significantly younger than those with a definite diagnosis, and PSIN were significantly more frequent in children with developmental delay. The most common reason for including patients in the PSIN group was the inability to categorically discriminate between a seizure and a nonepileptic mimicker. When the raters were compelled to classify the spells in the PSIN group, the frequencies of erroneous diagnoses ranged between 32% and 38%. The final diagnoses on those patients were made based on the results of the EEG, MRI, and follow-up visits.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our data indicate that a diagnostic category of PSIN should be recognized and ought to be used in clinical practice. Acknowledging this uncertainty will result in lower frequencies of erroneous diagnoses, possible stigma, and potential exposure to unnecessary antiseizure medications.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估疑似新发癫痫患者中阵发性不定性发作(PSIN)的频率,评估将患者归入此类别的原因,并计算如果癫痫专家被迫将这些事件标记为癫痫发作或非癫痫性阵发性发作,错误诊断的发生率。

方法

参与本研究的患者参加了一项评估疑似新发无诱因癫痫发作患者的前瞻性研究。该研究包括详细的病史和对发作的详细描述、3 小时视频脑电图记录和癫痫协议脑 MRI。仅根据对癫痫发作事件的详细描述,两名癫痫专家被要求独立地将每位患者分类为明确诊断为无诱因癫痫发作或明确诊断为非癫痫性阵发性发作(组 1)和 PSIN(组 2)的患者。

结果

共纳入 1880 例连续患者,其中 255 例(13.6%)归入 PSIN 组。PSIN 患者明显比明确诊断的患者年轻,且 PSIN 在发育迟缓的儿童中更为常见。将患者归入 PSIN 组的最常见原因是无法明确区分癫痫发作和非癫痫性模仿物。当评估者被迫将 PSIN 组中的发作进行分类时,错误诊断的频率在 32%至 38%之间。对这些患者的最终诊断是基于 EEG、MRI 和随访结果得出的。

意义

我们的数据表明,应认识到 PSIN 这一诊断类别,并应在临床实践中使用。承认这种不确定性将降低错误诊断的频率、可能的污名化和潜在的暴露于不必要的抗癫痫药物。

相似文献

5
Paroxysmal nonepileptic events in children with epilepsy.癫痫患儿的阵发性非癫痫性事件
Epilepsy Res. 2017 May;132:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
7
Spectrum of Nonepileptic Paroxysmal Events in Children from Southern India.印度南部儿童非癫痫性发作性事件的谱
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019 Oct;10(4):608-612. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3399472. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

6
The global burden and stigma of epilepsy.癫痫的全球负担与污名化。
Epilepsy Behav. 2008 May;12(4):540-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.12.019. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
7
How confident are we of the diagnosis of epilepsy?我们对癫痫的诊断有多大把握?
Epilepsia. 2006;47 Suppl 1:9-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00653.x.
8
The costs of epilepsy misdiagnosis in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士癫痫误诊的成本。
Seizure. 2006 Dec;15(8):598-605. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2006.08.005. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
9
Adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs.抗癫痫药物的不良反应。
Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2005;181:30-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00506.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验