Heerink Jorn S, Gemen Eugenie, Oudega Ruud, Geersing Geert-Jan, Hopstaken Rogier, Kusters Ron
Department of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
J Appl Lab Med. 2022 Mar 2;7(2):444-455. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfab094.
In primary care, D-dimer-combined with a clinical assessment-is recommended for ruling-out venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, D-dimer testing frequently yields false-positive results, notably in the elderly, and the search for novel biomarkers thus continues. We assessed the added diagnostic value of 4 promising laboratory tests.
Plasma samples from 256 primary care patients suspected of VTE were collected. We explored added value (beyond D-dimer) of C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT-c), and factor VIII (FVIII). Diagnostic performance of these biomarkers was assessed univariably and by estimating their area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Added diagnostic potential beyond D-dimer testing was assessed using multivariable logistic regression.
Plasma samples of 237 VTE-suspected patients were available for analysis-36 patients (25%) confirmed deep vein thrombosis, 11 patients (12%) pulmonary embolism. Apart from D-dimer, only CRP, and FVIII levels appeared to be higher in patients with VTE compared to patients without VTE. The AUCs for these 3 markers were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68-0.83), respectively, whereas the AUC for D-dimer was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.94). Combining these biomarkers in a multivariable logistic model with D-dimer did not improve these AUCs meaningfully.
In our dataset, we were unable to demonstrate any added diagnostic performance beyond D-dimer testing of novel biomarkers in patients suspected of VTE in primary care. As such, D-dimer testing appears to remain the best choice in the exclusion of clinically suspected VTE in this setting.
Netherlands Trial Register NL5974. (METC protocol number: 16-356/M; NL56475.041.16.).
在初级医疗保健中,推荐使用D - 二聚体结合临床评估来排除静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)。然而,D - 二聚体检测经常产生假阳性结果,尤其是在老年人中,因此对新型生物标志物的探索仍在继续。我们评估了4种有前景的实验室检测的附加诊断价值。
收集了256例疑似VTE的初级医疗保健患者的血浆样本。我们探讨了C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)、凝血酶 - 抗凝血酶III复合物(TAT - c)和因子VIII(FVIII)超出D - 二聚体的附加价值。对这些生物标志物的诊断性能进行了单变量评估,并通过估计其受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估。使用多变量逻辑回归评估超出D - 二聚体检测的附加诊断潜力。
237例疑似VTE患者的血浆样本可供分析,36例患者(25%)确诊为深静脉血栓形成,11例患者(12%)确诊为肺栓塞。与无VTE的患者相比,除D - 二聚体外,只有CRP和FVIII水平在VTE患者中似乎更高。这3种标志物的AUC分别为0.76(95%CI:0.69 - 0.84)和0.75(95%CI:0.68 - 0.83),而D - 二聚体的AUC为0.90(95%CI:0.86 - 0.94)。在多变量逻辑模型中将这些生物标志物与D - 二聚体结合并没有显著提高这些AUC。
在我们的数据集中,我们无法证明在初级医疗保健中疑似VTE的患者中,新型生物标志物超出D - 二聚体检测具有任何附加诊断性能。因此,在这种情况下,D - 二聚体检测似乎仍然是排除临床疑似VTE的最佳选择。
荷兰试验注册编号NL5974。(METC方案编号:16 - 356/M;NL56475.041.16。)