Pepose Vision Institute, Chesterfield, Missouri.
The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ophthalmology. 2022 Mar;129(3):295-307. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.016. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: Phase 3, open-label, randomized, visual acuity assessor-masked noninferiority and equivalence trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with nAMD diagnosed within 9 months of screening previously treated with and responsive to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomized 3:2 to treatment with the PDS with ranibizumab 100 mg/ml with fixed 24-week (Q24W) refill-exchanges (PDS Q24W) or intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg injections every 4 weeks (monthly ranibizumab). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point was change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter (letters) score from baseline averaged over weeks 36 and 40 (noninferiority margin,-4.5 letters; equivalence margin, ±4.5 letters). RESULTS: Archway enrolled 418 patients; 251 were randomized to and 248 received treatment with the PDS Q24W, and 167 were randomized to and received treatment with monthly ranibizumab. Baseline BCVA was 74.4 letters (PDS Q24W arm) and 75.5 letters (monthly ranibizumab arm; Snellen equivalent, 20/32). Adjusted mean change in BCVA score from baseline averaged over weeks 36 and 40 was +0.2 letters (standard error [SE], 0.5 letters) in the PDS Q24W arm and +0.5 letters (SE, 0.6 letters) in the monthly ranibizumab arm (difference, -0.3 letters; 95% confidence interval, -1.7 to 1.1 letters). PDS Q24W was both noninferior and equivalent to monthly ranibizumab. Of 246 PDS-treated patients assessed for supplemental ranibizumab treatment, 242 (98.4%) did not receive supplemental ranibizumab treatment before the first refill-exchange procedure, including 4 patients who discontinued treatment before the first refill-exchange procedure. Prespecified ocular adverse events of special interest were reported in 47 patients (19.0%) in the PDS Q24W arm and 10 patients (6.0%) in the monthly ranibizumab arm, which included, in the former arm, 4 (1.6%) endophthalmitis cases, 2 (0.8%) retinal detachments, 13 (5.2%) vitreous hemorrhages, 6 (2.4%) conjunctival erosions, and 5 (2.0%) conjunctival retractions. Most ocular adverse events in the PDS Q24W arm occurred within 1 month of implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Archway met its primary objective and PDS Q24W demonstrated noninferior and equivalent efficacy to monthly ranibizumab, with 98.4% of PDS-treated patients not receiving supplemental treatment in the first 24-week interval.
目的:评估载药系统(PDS)联合雷珠单抗治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)的安全性和疗效。
设计:3 期、开放性、随机、视力评估者设盲的非劣效性和等效性试验。
参与者:筛选期内确诊为 nAMD 且在 9 个月内接受过抗血管内皮生长因子治疗且有应答的患者。
方法:患者按 3:2 的比例随机分组,接受载药系统联合雷珠单抗 100mg/ml (24 周固定剂量 refill-exchange,PDS Q24W)或玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗 0.5mg (每月雷珠单抗)治疗。
主要观察指标:主要终点为治疗 36 周和 40 周时最佳矫正视力(BCVA)平均变化量,以早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究字母(letters)评分表示(非劣效性界值,-4.5 个字母;等效性界值,±4.5 个字母)。
结果:Archway 纳入 418 例患者;251 例随机分组并接受 PDS Q24W 治疗,167 例随机分组并接受每月雷珠单抗治疗。基线时 BCVA 为 74.4 个字母(PDS Q24W 组)和 75.5 个字母(每月雷珠单抗组;Snellen 等价视力,20/32)。治疗 36 周和 40 周时,BCVA 评分的平均变化量在 PDS Q24W 组为+0.2 个字母(标准误 [SE],0.5 个字母),在每月雷珠单抗组为+0.5 个字母(SE,0.6 个字母)(差值,-0.3 个字母;95%置信区间,-1.7 至 1.1 个字母)。PDS Q24W 既非劣效于每月雷珠单抗,又等效于每月雷珠单抗。在接受补充雷珠单抗治疗评估的 246 例 PDS 治疗患者中,242 例(98.4%)在首次 refill-exchange 前未接受补充雷珠单抗治疗,包括 4 例在首次 refill-exchange 前停止治疗的患者。在 PDS Q24W 组有 47 例(19.0%)和每月雷珠单抗组有 10 例(6.0%)患者报告了特定的眼部不良事件,前者包括 4 例(1.6%)眼内炎病例、2 例(0.8%)视网膜脱离、13 例(5.2%)玻璃体积血、6 例(2.4%)结膜糜烂和 5 例(2.0%)结膜退缩。PDS Q24W 组大多数眼部不良事件发生在植入后 1 个月内。
结论:Archway 达到了主要目标,PDS Q24W 显示出与每月雷珠单抗非劣效且等效的疗效,98.4%的 PDS 治疗患者在最初的 24 周内未接受补充治疗。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025-8-28
Pharmaceutics. 2025-5-1
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025-4-1
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2025-5
Int J Mol Sci. 2024-12-4
Asian J Pharm Sci. 2024-10