Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 1;11(1):19599. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99151-w.
Previous findings indicate that co-contractions of plantarflexors and dorsiflexors during quiet standing increase the ankle mechanical joint stiffness, resulting in increased postural sway. Balance impairments in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) may be due to co-contractions like in other individuals with reduced balance ability. Here we investigated the effect of co-contraction between plantar- and dorsiflexors on postural balance in individuals with iSCI (iSCI-group) and able-bodied individuals (AB-group). Thirteen able-bodied individuals and 13 individuals with iSCI were asked to perform quiet standing with their eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC). Kinetics and electromyograms from the tibialis anterior (TA), soleus and medial gastrocnemius were collected bilaterally. The iSCI-group exhibited more co-contractions than the AB-group (EO: 0.208% vs. 75.163%, p = 0.004; EC: 1.767% vs. 92.373%, p = 0.016). Furthermore, postural sway was larger during co-contractions than during no co-contraction in the iSCI-group (EO: 1.405 cm/s vs. 0.867 cm/s, p = 0.023; EC: 1.831 cm/s vs. 1.179 cm/s, p = 0.030), but no differences were found for the AB-group (EO: 0.393 cm/s vs. 0.499 cm/s, p = 1.00; EC: 0.686 cm/s vs. 0.654 cm/s, p = 1.00). To investigate the mechanism, we performed a computational simulation study using an inverted pendulum model and linear controllers. An increase of mechanical stiffness in the simulated iSCI-group resulted in increased postural sway (EO: 2.520 cm/s vs. 1.174 cm/s, p < 0.001; EC: 4.226 cm/s vs. 1.836 cm/s, p < 0.001), but not for the simulated AB-group (EO: 0.658 cm/s vs. 0.658 cm/s, p = 1.00; EC: 0.943 cm/s vs. 0.926 cm/s, p = 0.190). Thus, we demonstrated that co-contractions may be a compensatory strategy for individuals with iSCI to accommodate for decreased motor function, but co-contractions may result in increased ankle mechanical joint stiffness and consequently postural sway.
先前的研究结果表明,在安静站立时,跖屈肌和背屈肌的共同收缩会增加踝关节的机械关节刚度,从而导致姿势摆动增加。不完全性脊髓损伤(iSCI)患者的平衡障碍可能是由于与其他平衡能力降低的个体一样存在共同收缩。在这里,我们研究了 iSCI 患者(iSCI 组)和健全个体(AB 组)中足底和背屈肌之间共同收缩对姿势平衡的影响。我们要求 13 名健全个体和 13 名 iSCI 患者睁眼(EO)和闭眼(EC)进行安静站立。从胫骨前肌(TA)、比目鱼肌和内侧腓肠肌双侧采集动力学和肌电图。与 AB 组相比,iSCI 组的共同收缩更大(EO:0.208%比 75.163%,p=0.004;EC:1.767%比 92.373%,p=0.016)。此外,与无共同收缩相比,iSCI 组在共同收缩时的姿势摆动更大(EO:1.405cm/s 比 0.867cm/s,p=0.023;EC:1.831cm/s 比 1.179cm/s,p=0.030),但 AB 组没有发现差异(EO:0.393cm/s 比 0.499cm/s,p=1.00;EC:0.686cm/s 比 0.654cm/s,p=1.00)。为了探究其机制,我们使用倒立摆模型和线性控制器进行了计算模拟研究。模拟 iSCI 组机械刚度的增加导致姿势摆动增加(EO:2.520cm/s 比 1.174cm/s,p<0.001;EC:4.226cm/s 比 1.836cm/s,p<0.001),但模拟 AB 组没有变化(EO:0.658cm/s 比 0.658cm/s,p=1.00;EC:0.943cm/s 比 0.926cm/s,p=0.190)。因此,我们证明了共同收缩可能是 iSCI 患者适应运动功能下降的一种代偿策略,但共同收缩可能导致踝关节机械关节刚度增加,从而导致姿势摆动增加。