• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙科X线胶片的特性曲线。

Characteristic curves of dental x-ray film.

作者信息

Havukainen R, Servomaa A

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986 Jul;62(1):107-9. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(86)90081-2.

DOI:10.1016/0030-4220(86)90081-2
PMID:3460001
Abstract

The characteristic curves of the dental x-ray films Ultra-Speed, Ekta-Speed, Defilux, Dentus, and Phil-X30, all of which are used in Finland, and the absorption of radiation in the films with their protective wrappers were determined at the x-ray laboratory of the Institute of Radiation Protection. The most sensitive film (Ekta-Speed) was found to be almost three times more sensitive than the least sensitive film (Defilux). In the usable optical density range, the gradient of the characteristic curve obtained with the three most sensitive film types--Ekta-Speed, Dentus and Ultra-Speed--was roughly the same, whereas Phil-X30 was far more gentle. All film types gave a resolution better than 10 lp/mm. The grain size used in the most sensitive film was slightly larger than that used in the less sensitive films. The films provided with lead backing foil transmitted 10% to 20% of the radiation, whereas the film type without lead backing foil (Phil-X30) transmitted 70% to 80%.

摘要

对芬兰使用的Ultra-Speed、Ekta-Speed、Defilux、Dentus和Phil-X30牙科X光片的特性曲线以及带有防护包装的胶片的辐射吸收情况,在辐射防护研究所的X光实验室进行了测定。结果发现,最敏感的胶片(Ekta-Speed)的敏感度几乎是最不敏感的胶片(Defilux)的三倍。在可用的光学密度范围内,三种最敏感的胶片类型——Ekta-Speed、Dentus和Ultra-Speed——所获得的特性曲线的梯度大致相同,而Phil-X30则平缓得多。所有胶片类型的分辨率均优于10 lp/mm。最敏感胶片所用的颗粒尺寸略大于较不敏感胶片所用的颗粒尺寸。带有铅背衬箔的胶片能透射10%至20%的辐射,而没有铅背衬箔的胶片类型(Phil-X30)能透射70%至80%。

相似文献

1
Characteristic curves of dental x-ray film.牙科X线胶片的特性曲线。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986 Jul;62(1):107-9. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(86)90081-2.
2
Comparing the sensitometric properties of dental X-ray films.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1995 Mar;126(3):341-4. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0178.
3
A comparison of a new dental X-ray film, Agfa Gevaert Dentus M4, with Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed dental X-ray films.一种新型牙科X光胶片(爱克发·吉华特Dentus M4)与柯达Ektaspeed和Ultraspeed牙科X光胶片的比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1993 Feb;22(1):7-12. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.22.1.8508944.
4
Sensitometric comparison of dental films of groups D and E.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982 Aug;54(2):250-2. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(82)90225-0.
5
[Structure of medical X-ray films].[医用X线胶片的结构]
Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi. 1990 Mar;28(1 Pt 1):195-202.
6
Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.新型F速牙科X线胶片的评估。冲洗液的作用及与D速和E速胶片的比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000 Jan;29(1):41-5. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600499.
7
A laboratory evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray film.爱克发速显Plus牙科X线胶片的实验室评估
J Dent. 1995 Dec;23(6):359-63. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(94)00018-b.
8
Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions.两种冲洗条件下超高速、Ektaspeed和Ektaspeed Plus口腔内胶片的密度测量比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Jan;79(1):105-13. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(05)80084-8.
9
Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1995 Feb;24(1):30-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.24.1.8593905.
10
Sensitometric comparison of Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed Dental Films.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Jan;79(1):114-6. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(05)80085-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The evaluation of effect of developer age in the detection of approximal caries using three speed dental x-ray films: an in-vitro study.使用三种不同感光度牙科X光片评估显影剂年龄对邻面龋检测效果的影响:一项体外研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Mar;8(3):236-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7771.4172. Epub 2014 Mar 15.