Learning and Cognition Key Laboratory of Beijing, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, 300387, China; Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, 300387, China.
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Nov 12;162:108043. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108043. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
A fearful face as second visual target (T2) was detected better than a neutral T2 in a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) task. The advantage of fear over neutral emotion was originally attributed to a limited-capacity mechanism, in which fearful stimuli are prioritized for attention over neutral stimuli. However, more recent studies have shown that the prioritization of the processing of fear is strongly dependent on the emotional task relevance. Combining the RSVP task and Garner's paradigm, by varying the expression (fearful and neutral faces) and the emotional task relevance of the T2 (relevance: emotion classification task; irrelevance: gender classification task), this study aims to investigate the role of emotional task relevance on the advantage of fear during an RSVP task in which participants have to identify two visual targets in a stream of distractors. The behavioral results revealed that there was no significant effect of the expression on the task performance in the gender classification task. Fearful faces were easier to detect than neutral faces, but the T2 accuracy of fearful faces was lower than that of neutral faces in the emotion classification task. Furthermore, we found that the vertex positive potential and P100 components were enhanced for fearful faces compared to neutral faces independent of the emotional task relevance. For the P300 component, there was no significant difference in the gender classification task, but fearful faces elicited enhanced P300 amplitudes compared to neutral faces in the emotion classification task. These results indicated that the early processing of fear is automatic, while the late processing of fear is dependent on the emotional task relevance under limited attentional resources.
在快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)任务中,作为第二个视觉目标(T2)的恐惧面孔比中性 T2 更容易被检测到。恐惧相对于中性情绪的优势最初归因于一种有限容量的机制,其中恐惧刺激优先于中性刺激受到关注。然而,最近的研究表明,对恐惧的处理的优先化强烈依赖于情绪任务的相关性。通过结合 RSVP 任务和 Garner 的范式,通过改变 T2 的表情(恐惧和中性面孔)和情绪任务相关性(相关性:情绪分类任务;不相关:性别分类任务),本研究旨在探讨情绪任务相关性对 RSVP 任务中恐惧优势的作用,在该任务中,参与者必须在分心的信息流中识别两个视觉目标。行为结果表明,在性别分类任务中,表情对任务表现没有显著影响。恐惧面孔比中性面孔更容易被检测到,但在情绪分类任务中,恐惧面孔的 T2 准确率低于中性面孔。此外,我们发现,与中性面孔相比,顶点正电位和 P100 成分在恐惧面孔中增强,而与情绪任务相关性无关。对于 P300 成分,在性别分类任务中没有显著差异,但在情绪分类任务中,与中性面孔相比,恐惧面孔引起的 P300 幅度增强。这些结果表明,恐惧的早期处理是自动的,而在有限的注意力资源下,恐惧的后期处理取决于情绪任务相关性。