School of Earth and Environmental Sciences & Research Institute of Oceanography, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences & Research Institute of Oceanography, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Environ Pollut. 2022 Jan 1;292(Pt A):118262. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118262. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
We present a comprehensive review of the sediment quality triad (SQT) assessment studies in Korea. The bibliographic analysis was applied to evaluate how approaches in sediment assessment have evolved. A meta-analysis was performed, to evaluate potential risks of sedimentary persistent toxic substances (PTSs) reported in Korean coastal waters. Within the framework, we identified and discussed current status and spatiotemporal trends in contamination of both classic and emerging PTSs over the recent decadal period. Out of 26 target regions in Korea, five hotspots (Sihwa, Masan, Ulsan, Taean, and Gwangyang) of concern could be identified. Four of those regions have been designated as Specially-Managed Sea Area under the implementation of Total Pollution Load Management System in Korea, except for Taean coast (oil spill site). Meantime, we could identify three stepwise research phases based on a bibliographic analysis; Phase 1 (1995-2008), Phase 2 (2009-2015), and Phase 3 (2016-2020). It is noteworthy that a technical evolution of the SQT assessment by the phase was featured. It was also evidenced that in-depth studies adopting multiple lines of evidence (LOEs) became prevailed upon approaching Phase 3. In a quantitative manner, the toxicity explanatory power of target PTSs increased by about 10% in Phase 3 compared to the earlier phases. The meta-analysis using ratio-to-mean value method applied for the data set having all three LOEs indicated general improvement of sediment qualities in the hotspots. However, their associations quite varied across regions and years, reflecting a dynamicity in oceanographic settings and/or heterogeneity in toxicological effect or benthic community response. At present, SQT assessment adopting the increased LOEs generally supports better assessment. In conclusion, we suggest that future SQT studies globally should reaffirm the utility of the "multiple LOEs approach", focusing on the identification and management of causative toxicants that driving negative ecological impacts on marine ecosystems.
我们对韩国的沉积物质量三联体(SQT)评估研究进行了全面综述。通过文献分析评估了沉积物评估方法的演变。进行了荟萃分析,以评估韩国沿海水域报告的沉积持久性有毒物质(PTSs)的潜在风险。在该框架内,我们确定并讨论了在最近几十年中,经典和新兴 PTSs 的污染现状和时空趋势。在韩国的 26 个目标区域中,有五个热点(西海、马山、蔚山、泰安和光阳)受到关注。其中四个区域已被指定为特别管理海域,因为在韩国实施的总量污染负荷管理制度下,除泰安海岸(溢油地点)外,其余四个区域均已被指定为特别管理海域。同时,我们可以根据文献分析确定三个逐步的研究阶段;第 1 阶段(1995-2008 年)、第 2 阶段(2009-2015 年)和第 3 阶段(2016-2020 年)。值得注意的是,SQT 评估在各阶段都有技术上的发展。也有证据表明,在第 3 阶段,采用多种证据(LOEs)的深入研究变得更为普遍。从定量的角度来看,与早期阶段相比,第 3 阶段目标 PTSs 的毒性解释能力提高了约 10%。应用具有所有三种 LOEs 的数据集进行的比值-均值比值法荟萃分析表明,热点地区的沉积物质量普遍得到改善。然而,它们的相关性在不同地区和年份之间差异很大,反映了海洋环境的动态性以及/或毒理学效应或底栖群落响应的异质性。目前,采用增加 LOEs 的 SQT 评估通常支持更好的评估。总之,我们建议全球未来的 SQT 研究应重新确认“多 LOEs 方法”的实用性,重点是确定和管理导致对海洋生态系统产生负面影响的致毒物质。