• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

负责任的共享经济需要心理学科学。

Psychological science for a responsible sharing economy.

机构信息

University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.032. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.032
PMID:34601400
Abstract

The sharing economy is fueled by trust, which allows strangers to cooperate. To share responsibly, one needs to be aware of the various consequences sharing has on interacting and third parties. When transparency about such consequences is lacking, mutual trust among interacting parties may encourage people to cooperate and share, in turn, creating unintended negative impacts. Psychologists have long studied trust and cooperation, yet few insights from psychological science have been used to understand the sharing economy. Here, we propose that evoking trust may paradoxically increase motivated information processing leading people to share irresponsibly by ignoring the negative consequences sharing has on others. We review three conditions under which evoking trust may lead to irresponsible sharing: ethical blind spots, willful ignorance, and misinformation. We propose that transparent information is key to enable and encourage responsible sharing. More psychological research is needed to better understand how this flourishing, trust-based industry can be shaped to encourage safe, cooperative, and responsible sharing.

摘要

共享经济是建立在信任基础上的,这种信任使得陌生人之间能够合作。为了负责任地共享,人们需要意识到共享对互动和第三方的各种影响。当缺乏关于这些后果的透明度时,互动各方之间的相互信任可能会鼓励人们合作和共享,从而产生意想不到的负面影响。心理学家长期以来一直在研究信任和合作,但很少有心理学研究的见解被用来理解共享经济。在这里,我们提出,唤起信任可能会自相矛盾地增加动机信息处理,导致人们不负责任地共享,而忽略了共享对他人的负面影响。我们回顾了唤起信任可能导致不负责任共享的三种情况:道德盲点、故意无视和错误信息。我们提出,透明信息是实现和鼓励负责任共享的关键。需要更多的心理学研究来更好地理解如何塑造这个蓬勃发展的、基于信任的行业,以鼓励安全、合作和负责任的共享。

相似文献

1
Psychological science for a responsible sharing economy.负责任的共享经济需要心理学科学。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.032. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
2
Governing health data across changing contexts: A focus group study of citizen's views in England, Iceland, and Sweden.在不断变化的背景下管理健康数据:对英格兰、冰岛和瑞典公民观点的焦点小组研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Dec;156:104623. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104623. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
3
Understanding the Barriers and Facilitators to Sharing Patient-Generated Health Data Using Digital Technology for People Living With Long-Term Health Conditions: A Narrative Review.理解使用数字技术为长期健康状况患者共享患者生成的健康数据的障碍和促进因素:叙事评论。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 23;9:641424. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.641424. eCollection 2021.
4
The impact of commercialisation and genetic data sharing arrangements on public trust and the intention to participate in biobank research.商业化和基因数据共享安排对公众信任及参与生物样本库研究意愿的影响。
Public Health Genomics. 2015;18(3):160-72. doi: 10.1159/000375441. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
5
Trust and cooperative behavior: Evidence from the realm of data-sharing.信任与合作行为:来自数据共享领域的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 21;14(8):e0220115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220115. eCollection 2019.
6
Research Stakeholders' Views on Benefits and Challenges for Public Health Research Data Sharing in Kenya: The Importance of Trust and Social Relations.肯尼亚研究利益相关者对公共卫生研究数据共享的益处和挑战的看法:信任和社会关系的重要性
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0135545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135545. eCollection 2015.
7
Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.患者对使用数字系统进行动态同意和研究反馈来共享匿名个人健康数据的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5011.
8
Why do people gossip? Reputation promotes honest reputational information sharing.为什么人们会说闲话?声誉促进了诚实的声誉信息共享。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Apr;62(2):708-724. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12589. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
9
Factors that influence data sharing through data sharing platforms: A qualitative study on the views and experiences of cohort holders and platform developers.影响通过数据共享平台进行数据共享的因素:队列持有者和平台开发者观点和经验的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 2;16(7):e0254202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254202. eCollection 2021.
10
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.