Faculty of Law and Criminology, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211 LK Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Faculty of Law and Criminology, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211 LK Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2021 Nov;53:101970. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2021.101970. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
When a capital crime is committed the post-mortem interval (PMI) is of particular importance in investigating a suspect's alibi in court. A forensic expert can use different methods to estimate the PMI. This research focuses on who is considered an expert in court and whether the methods used to estimate the PMI are reliable. In this study, the methods used to estimate the PMI and the experts consulted, available in Dutch jurisprudence, in the period 2010-2019 were investigated. Ninety-four judicial cases were included and multiple experts and methods of estimating the PMI were found. As part of this study, the methods that were used to estimate the PMI in court were subjected to the Daubert criteria. Of these methods, only the Henssge nomogram and entomological methods met the Daubert criteria. However, the methods are only useful when applied by the right forensic expert and in the right manner. Unfortunately, this was not always the case.
当发生死刑犯罪时,尸检后间隔时间(PMI)在法庭上调查嫌疑人的不在场证明方面尤为重要。法医专家可以使用不同的方法来估计 PMI。本研究重点关注谁在法庭上被视为专家,以及用于估计 PMI 的方法是否可靠。在这项研究中,调查了 2010 年至 2019 年荷兰判例法中可用的估计 PMI 的方法和咨询的专家。共纳入 94 例司法案件,发现了多个估计 PMI 的专家和方法。作为本研究的一部分,法庭上用于估计 PMI 的方法都经过了多伯特标准的检验。在这些方法中,只有 Henssge 列线图和昆虫学方法符合多伯特标准。然而,这些方法只有在由正确的法医专家以正确的方式应用时才有用。不幸的是,情况并非总是如此。