Department of Surgery, Patan Hospital, Patan Academy of Health Sciences (PAHS), Lalitpur, Kathmandu, Nepal.
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2021 Sep 6;19(2):434-436. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v19i2.3670.
Good research writing and publication practices are important to identify, acknowledge, and generate awareness for ethical and credible science. Academic requirement for research thesis, and 'publish or perish' culture of academia for career evaluation of faculties contribute to authorship misconducts. The authorship criteria have been clearly outlined by international guidelines like International Committee of Medical Journals Editors, Committee on Publication Ethics, Council of Science Editors, World Association of Medical Editors. However, the practice of guide, co-guide as authors in students' thesis articles continues as inappropriate authorship. This is a topic which requires more debate in academia. Historical practices of academia, the power dynamics, and the guidelines of the journals vary and make this dispute even more complicated. In Nepal, we need to expand the discussion among stakeholders from academia, universities, monitoring bodies, ethical committees to journals for a consensus; to 'put to rest' this issue and be in line with the international guidelines. Keywords: Authorship guideline; journal article publication; research thesis guide co-guide supervisor.
良好的研究写作和出版实践对于识别、承认和提高对道德和可信科学的认识非常重要。学术研究论文的要求,以及学术界为教师职业评估而实行的“出版或灭亡”文化,导致了作者不当行为的出现。国际指南,如国际医学期刊编辑委员会、出版道德委员会、科学编辑理事会、世界医学编辑协会,已经明确概述了作者标准。然而,在学生论文文章中指导者和共同指导者作为作者的做法仍然是不合适的。这是一个需要在学术界进行更多辩论的话题。学术界的历史惯例、权力动态以及期刊的指南各不相同,这使得争议更加复杂。在尼泊尔,我们需要扩大学术界、大学、监督机构、伦理委员会和期刊之间的利益相关者之间的讨论,以达成共识;解决这个问题,并与国际指南保持一致。关键词:作者指南;期刊文章出版;研究论文指导者、共同指导者、导师。