Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术治疗单侧颈动脉狭窄时颈内动脉背压测量的有效性

The validity of internal carotid back pressure measurements during carotid endarterectomy for unilateral carotid stenosis.

作者信息

Lord R S, Graham A R

出版信息

Aust N Z J Surg. 1986 Jun;56(6):493-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1986.tb02362.x.

Abstract

Peri-operative neurological deficits in 212 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for unilateral carotid stenosis were examined to determine whether the internal carotid back pressure (ICBP) correctly predicted the need for a protective shunt during temporary carotid occlusion. Three strokes occurred in 149 patients who were not shunted. In one of these the ICBP indicated the need for a shunt, but shunting was not possible for technical reasons and a stroke due to hypoperfusion occurred. In another patient a stroke occurred as a result of embolism. There was only one patient where the ICBP possibly incorrectly predicted that a shunt would not be necessary. Four strokes due to various causes occurred in the 63 shunted patients. Shunting was not withheld from these patients in order to prove that ICBP would correctly predict their vulnerability to hypoperfusion since to have done so would be unethical. The results indicate that in patients with unilateral carotid stenosis the ICBP is an accurate indicator of which patients can undergo carotid endarterectomy without the need for shunting.

摘要

对212例因单侧颈动脉狭窄而行颈动脉内膜切除术的患者围手术期神经功能缺损情况进行了检查,以确定颈内动脉背压(ICBP)是否能正确预测在临时阻断颈动脉期间是否需要使用保护分流管。在149例未使用分流管的患者中发生了3例中风。其中1例患者ICBP提示需要使用分流管,但由于技术原因无法进行分流,进而发生了因灌注不足导致的中风。另1例患者因栓塞发生了中风。只有1例患者,ICBP可能错误地预测不需要使用分流管。在63例使用分流管的患者中,因各种原因发生了4例中风。未对这些患者不使用分流管,以便证明ICBP能正确预测他们对灌注不足的易感性,因为这样做是不道德的。结果表明,对于单侧颈动脉狭窄患者,ICBP是哪些患者可以在不使用分流管的情况下进行颈动脉内膜切除术的准确指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验