• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊柱推拿疗法与颈痛患者颈椎运动节段相互作用变化的关联:一项匹配无症状对照的观察性研究

Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Changes in Cervical Motion Segment Interactions in Patients With Neck Pain: An Observational Study With Matched Asymptomatic Controls.

作者信息

du Rose Alister J, Branney Jonathan, Breen Alan C

机构信息

The Centre for Biomechanics Research, AECC University College, Bournemouth, England.

Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, England.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Jul-Aug;44(6):475-486. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.07.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.07.002
PMID:34607643
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to determine (1) if maximal intervertebral range of motion (IV-RoMmax) and laxity interactions exist in the cervical spine during flexion, (2) if there are differences in IV-RoMmax or laxity parameters between baseline and follow-up in both patients with neck pain and asymptomatic controls, and (3) if there is an effect on IV-RoMmax/laxity relationships in patients with neck pain after spinal manipulative therapy.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with subacute or chronic neck pain and 33 asymptomatic controls were imaged during flexion and extension, pre and post a course of cervical chiropractic manipulation (patient group only), using a standardized quantitative fluoroscopy acquisition protocol.

RESULTS

Significant correlations between IV-RoMs were found in both neck pain and neck pain-free populations at baseline and follow-up. Positive relationships were found between C2-C3 and C3-C4 and C4-C5 and C5-C6 IV-RoM in both populations. A negative correlation was found in the patient group at baseline between C1-C2 and C5-C6, but not at follow-up. Significant relationships were also found for segmental laxity, with a negative correlation found at C1-C2 and C5-C6 in the patient group only and at baseline only.

CONCLUSION

Distinct relationships were found between both intraregional IV-RoM and laxity, many of which were present in both groups at baseline and follow-up, suggestive of normal kinematic behaviors. Changes in correlations unique to the patient group may be indicative of a change in regional kinematics resulting from the manipulation intervention. Spinal manipulative therapy may have a therapeutic effect by influencing cervical kinematics at the regional level.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定:(1)颈椎在屈曲过程中是否存在最大椎间活动范围(IV-RoMmax)与松弛度的相互作用;(2)颈部疼痛患者和无症状对照组在基线和随访之间IV-RoMmax或松弛度参数是否存在差异;(3)脊柱手法治疗后颈部疼痛患者的IV-RoMmax/松弛度关系是否受到影响。

方法

采用标准化的定量荧光透视采集方案,对29例亚急性或慢性颈部疼痛患者和33例无症状对照者在颈椎整脊手法治疗疗程(仅患者组)前后进行屈伸成像。

结果

在基线和随访时,颈部疼痛患者和无颈部疼痛人群的IV-RoM之间均存在显著相关性。在这两个人群中,C2-C3与C3-C4以及C4-C5与C5-C6的IV-RoM之间均呈正相关。在患者组中,基线时C1-C2与C5-C6之间呈负相关,但随访时未发现。节段性松弛度也存在显著关系,仅在患者组的基线时,C1-C2和C5-C6处呈负相关。

结论

区域内IV-RoM和松弛度之间均存在明显关系,其中许多在基线和随访时两组中均存在,提示正常的运动行为。患者组特有的相关性变化可能表明手法干预导致区域运动学发生改变。脊柱手法治疗可能通过影响区域水平的颈椎运动学而具有治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Changes in Cervical Motion Segment Interactions in Patients With Neck Pain: An Observational Study With Matched Asymptomatic Controls.脊柱推拿疗法与颈痛患者颈椎运动节段相互作用变化的关联:一项匹配无症状对照的观察性研究
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Jul-Aug;44(6):475-486. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.07.002.
2
Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.颈椎高速低幅手法治疗前后的颈椎节段运动学。
Spine J. 2018 Dec;18(12):2333-2342. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.026. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
3
Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.单节段和双节段颈椎置换与融合术的生物力学比较:对邻近节段脊柱运动学的影响。
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.006.
4
Dimensional changes of the neuroforamina in subaxial cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.颈椎下颈椎节段神经孔在体内动态屈伸过程中的尺寸变化。
Spine J. 2016 Apr;16(4):540-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.11.052. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
5
Does inter-vertebral range of motion increase after spinal manipulation? A prospective cohort study.脊柱推拿后椎间活动度会增加吗?一项前瞻性队列研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Jul 1;22:24. doi: 10.1186/s12998-014-0024-9. eCollection 2014.
6
Outcomes of active cervical therapeutic exercise on dynamic intervertebral foramen changes in neck pain patients with disc herniation.主动式颈椎治疗运动对椎间盘突出症颈痛患者椎间孔动态变化的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jul 30;23(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05670-6.
7
Recurrent neck pain patients exhibit altered joint motion pattern during cervical flexion and extension movements.复发性颈部疼痛患者在颈椎屈伸运动过程中表现出关节运动模式改变。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Jan;71:125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.10.026. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
A Pilot Longitudinal Study of 3-Dimensional Head and Neck Kinematics During Functional Tasks in Individuals With Chronic Idiopathic Neck Pain Either Wait-Listed for or Receiving Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Exercise.一项慢性特发性颈痛患者在接受或等待接受脊椎手法治疗与运动的功能任务中三维头颈部运动学的初步纵向研究。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 Jun;43(5):490-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.01.003. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
9
Experimental cervical interspinous ligament pain altered cervical joint motion during dynamic extension movement.实验性颈椎棘间韧带疼痛在动态伸展运动过程中改变了颈椎关节活动。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 May;65:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
10
Subaxial Cervical Intradiscal Pressure and Segmental Kinematics Following Atlantoaxial Fixation in Different Angles.不同角度寰枢椎固定术后下颈椎椎间盘内压力及节段运动学
World Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;87:521-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.025. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
An observational study of quality of motion in the aging cervical spine: sequence of segmental contributions in dynamic fluoroscopy recordings.一项关于老年颈椎运动质量的观察性研究:动态透视记录中节段贡献的顺序。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Apr 25;25(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07423-z.