du Rose Alister J, Branney Jonathan, Breen Alan C
The Centre for Biomechanics Research, AECC University College, Bournemouth, England.
Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, England.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Jul-Aug;44(6):475-486. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.07.002.
The objectives of this study were to determine (1) if maximal intervertebral range of motion (IV-RoMmax) and laxity interactions exist in the cervical spine during flexion, (2) if there are differences in IV-RoMmax or laxity parameters between baseline and follow-up in both patients with neck pain and asymptomatic controls, and (3) if there is an effect on IV-RoMmax/laxity relationships in patients with neck pain after spinal manipulative therapy.
Twenty-nine patients with subacute or chronic neck pain and 33 asymptomatic controls were imaged during flexion and extension, pre and post a course of cervical chiropractic manipulation (patient group only), using a standardized quantitative fluoroscopy acquisition protocol.
Significant correlations between IV-RoMs were found in both neck pain and neck pain-free populations at baseline and follow-up. Positive relationships were found between C2-C3 and C3-C4 and C4-C5 and C5-C6 IV-RoM in both populations. A negative correlation was found in the patient group at baseline between C1-C2 and C5-C6, but not at follow-up. Significant relationships were also found for segmental laxity, with a negative correlation found at C1-C2 and C5-C6 in the patient group only and at baseline only.
Distinct relationships were found between both intraregional IV-RoM and laxity, many of which were present in both groups at baseline and follow-up, suggestive of normal kinematic behaviors. Changes in correlations unique to the patient group may be indicative of a change in regional kinematics resulting from the manipulation intervention. Spinal manipulative therapy may have a therapeutic effect by influencing cervical kinematics at the regional level.
本研究的目的是确定:(1)颈椎在屈曲过程中是否存在最大椎间活动范围(IV-RoMmax)与松弛度的相互作用;(2)颈部疼痛患者和无症状对照组在基线和随访之间IV-RoMmax或松弛度参数是否存在差异;(3)脊柱手法治疗后颈部疼痛患者的IV-RoMmax/松弛度关系是否受到影响。
采用标准化的定量荧光透视采集方案,对29例亚急性或慢性颈部疼痛患者和33例无症状对照者在颈椎整脊手法治疗疗程(仅患者组)前后进行屈伸成像。
在基线和随访时,颈部疼痛患者和无颈部疼痛人群的IV-RoM之间均存在显著相关性。在这两个人群中,C2-C3与C3-C4以及C4-C5与C5-C6的IV-RoM之间均呈正相关。在患者组中,基线时C1-C2与C5-C6之间呈负相关,但随访时未发现。节段性松弛度也存在显著关系,仅在患者组的基线时,C1-C2和C5-C6处呈负相关。
区域内IV-RoM和松弛度之间均存在明显关系,其中许多在基线和随访时两组中均存在,提示正常的运动行为。患者组特有的相关性变化可能表明手法干预导致区域运动学发生改变。脊柱手法治疗可能通过影响区域水平的颈椎运动学而具有治疗效果。